Suppr超能文献

癌症诊断前后心力衰竭药物治疗的使用情况:一项纵向研究。

Use of heart failure medical therapy before and after a cancer diagnosis: A longitudinal study.

作者信息

Ju Chengsheng, Lau Wallis C Y, Manisty Charlotte, Chambers Pinkie, Brauer Ruth, Forster Martin D, Mackenzie Isla S, Wei Li

机构信息

Research Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK.

Centre for Medicines Optimisation Research and Education, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Dec;11(6):3911-3923. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14981. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

Abstract

AIMS

We aim to evaluate change in the use of prognostic guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMTs) for heart failure (HF) before and after a cancer diagnosis as well as the matched non-cancer controls, including renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors (RASIs), beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a longitudinal study in patients with HF in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 2005 and 2021. We selected patients with probable HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) based on diagnostic and prescription records. We described the longitudinal trends in the use and dosing of GDMTs before and after receiving an incident cancer diagnosis. HF patients with cancer were matched with a 1:1 ratio to HF patients without cancer to investigate the association between cancer diagnosis and treatment adherence, persistence, initiation, and dose titration as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multivariable logistic regression models. Of 8504 eligible HFrEF patients with incident cancer, 4890 were matched to controls without cancer. The mean age was 75.7 (±8.4) years and 73.9% were male. In the 12 months following a cancer diagnosis, patients experienced reductions in the use and dosing of GDMT. Compared with the non-cancer controls, patients with cancer had higher risks for poor adherence for all three medication classes (RASIs: OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.35-1.68; beta-blockers: OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.08-1.37; MRAs: OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.08-1.59) and poor persistence (RASIs: OR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.75-2.37; beta-blockers: OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.12-1.63; MRAs: OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.16-1.93), and higher risks for dose down-titration for RASIs (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.40-2.04) and beta-blockers (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.05-1.62). Cancer diagnosis was not associated with treatment initiation or dose up-titration. Event rates for HF hospitalization and mortality were higher in patients with poor adherence or persistence to GDMTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Following a cancer diagnosis, patients with HFrEF were more likely to have reduced use of GDMTs for HF.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估癌症诊断前后以及匹配的非癌症对照中,心力衰竭(HF)患者使用预后性指南指导的药物治疗(GDMTs)的变化情况,这些治疗包括肾素 - 血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASIs)、β受体阻滞剂和盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRAs)。

方法与结果

我们在英国临床实践研究数据链中对2005年至2021年期间的HF患者进行了一项纵向研究。我们根据诊断和处方记录选择了射血分数降低的可能HF患者(HFrEF)。我们描述了接受新发癌症诊断前后GDMTs使用和剂量的纵向趋势。将癌症HF患者与无癌症HF患者按1:1比例匹配,使用多变量逻辑回归模型研究癌症诊断与治疗依从性、持续性、起始治疗和剂量滴定之间的关联,以比值比(ORs)及95%置信区间(CIs)表示。在8504例符合条件的新发癌症HFrEF患者中,4890例与无癌症对照匹配。平均年龄为75.7(±8.4)岁,73.9%为男性。在癌症诊断后的12个月内,患者的GDMT使用和剂量减少。与非癌症对照相比,癌症患者在所有三类药物(RASIs:OR = 1.51,95% CI = 1.35 - 1.68;β受体阻滞剂:OR = 1.22,95% CI = 1.08 - 1.37;MRAs:OR = 1.31,95% CI = 1.08 - 1.59)的依从性差和持续性差方面风险更高,在RASIs(OR = 1.69,95% CI = 1.40 - 2.04)和β受体阻滞剂(OR = 1.31,95% CI = 1.05 - 1.62)的剂量下调方面风险更高。癌症诊断与治疗起始或剂量上调无关。对GDMTs依从性或持续性差的患者,HF住院和死亡率的事件发生率更高。

结论

癌症诊断后,HFrEF患者更有可能减少HF的GDMTs使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f60a/11631296/143efb6ffbb4/EHF2-11-3911-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验