Austin A, Anderson A G, Lee J, Vander Steen H, Savard C, Bergmann C, Singh M, Devoe D, Gorrell S, Patten S, Le Grange D, Dimitropoulos G
The Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Int J Eat Disord. 2025 Jan;58(1):3-36. doi: 10.1002/eat.24252. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
To systematically review and evaluate the efficacy of eating disorder focused family therapy (FT-ED) in comparison to all other forms of psychotherapy for children and adolescents with anorexia nervosa. A secondary aim is to assess the relative efficacy of different variations of FT-ED (e.g., shorter vs. longer dose, parent-focused).
A search with relevant terms was systematically conducted on four databases. Twenty-three publications across 18 randomized controlled trials met inclusion criteria. Outcomes of interest included variables related to weight, eating psychopathology, and remission status. Study quality was assessed, and data were extracted by two independent researchers.
Adolescents receiving FT-ED gained significantly more weight by the end of treatment in comparison to those receiving individual psychotherapy. FT-ED that was delivered just to parents or to parents and child separately offered preferable weight outcomes and rates of recovery at the end of treatment in comparison to conjoint FT-ED. No other outcomes tested in the meta-analysis were statistically significant at the end of treatment or follow-up.
Currently available data suggest the use of FT-ED in its conjoint or separated/parent focused format is the best outpatient treatment option for adolescents with anorexia nervosa when immediate weight gain is paramount. The variability of outcome measurement, including the tools used and timepoints chosen, limit comparison among no more than a handful of studies. The field would benefit from the standardization of measurement and reporting guidelines for future clinical trials.
PROSPERO number: CRD42023396263.
系统回顾和评估饮食失调聚焦家庭疗法(FT-ED)相较于其他所有形式的心理治疗对神经性厌食症儿童和青少年的疗效。次要目的是评估FT-ED不同变体(例如,较短疗程与较长疗程、以父母为重点)的相对疗效。
在四个数据库上系统地进行了相关术语搜索。18项随机对照试验中的23篇出版物符合纳入标准。感兴趣的结果包括与体重、饮食心理病理学和缓解状态相关的变量。评估了研究质量,并由两名独立研究人员提取数据。
与接受个体心理治疗的青少年相比,接受FT-ED的青少年在治疗结束时体重增加显著更多。与联合FT-ED相比,仅针对父母或分别针对父母和孩子实施的FT-ED在治疗结束时提供了更好的体重结果和康复率。荟萃分析中测试的其他结果在治疗结束或随访时均无统计学意义。
现有数据表明,当立即增加体重至关重要时,以联合或分开/以父母为重点的形式使用FT-ED是神经性厌食症青少年的最佳门诊治疗选择。结果测量的可变性,包括使用的工具和选择的时间点,限制了不超过少数研究之间的比较。该领域将受益于未来临床试验测量和报告指南的标准化。
PROSPERO编号:CRD42023396263。