• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习预测围手术期术后恢复室患者非计划性护理升级:单中心回顾性研究。

Machine Learning Predicts Unplanned Care Escalations for Post-Anesthesia Care Unit Patients during the Perioperative Period: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

机构信息

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 901 19th Street South, PBMR 302, Birmingham, AL, 35294, United States of America.

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.

出版信息

J Med Syst. 2024 Jul 23;48(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02085-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10916-024-02085-9
PMID:39042285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11266221/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite low mortality for elective procedures in the United States and developed countries, some patients have unexpected care escalations (UCE) following post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge. Studies indicate patient risk factors for UCE, but determining which factors are most important is unclear. Machine learning (ML) can predict clinical events. We hypothesized that ML could predict patient UCE after PACU discharge in surgical patients and identify specific risk factors.

METHODS

We conducted a single center, retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (elective and emergent). We collected data from pre-operative visits, intra-operative records, PACU admissions, and the rate of UCE. We trained a ML model with this data and tested the model on an independent data set to determine its efficacy. Finally, we evaluated the individual patient and clinical factors most likely to predict UCE risk.

RESULTS

Our study revealed that ML could predict UCE risk which was approximately 5% in both the training and testing groups. We were able to identify patient risk factors such as patient vital signs, emergent procedure, ASA Status, and non-surgical anesthesia time as significant variable. We plotted Shapley values for significant variables for each patient to help determine which of these variables had the greatest effect on UCE risk. Of note, the UCE risk factors identified frequently by ML were in alignment with anesthesiologist clinical practice and the current literature.

CONCLUSIONS

We used ML to analyze data from a single-center, retrospective cohort of non-cardiac surgical patients, some of whom had an UCE. ML assigned risk prediction for patients to have UCE and determined perioperative factors associated with increased risk. We advocate to use ML to augment anesthesiologist clinical decision-making, help decide proper disposition from the PACU, and ensure the safest possible care of our patients.

摘要

背景

尽管在美国和发达国家,择期手术的死亡率较低,但仍有一些患者在离开麻醉后护理单元(PACU)后出现意外的医疗升级(UCE)。研究表明,患者存在 UCE 的风险因素,但尚不清楚哪些因素最重要。机器学习(ML)可以预测临床事件。我们假设 ML 可以预测 PACU 出院后的手术患者的 UCE,并确定具体的风险因素。

方法

我们对所有接受非心脏手术(择期和紧急)的患者进行了单中心回顾性分析。我们从术前访视、术中记录、PACU 入院和 UCE 发生率中收集数据。我们使用这些数据训练了一个 ML 模型,并在一个独立的数据集中测试该模型,以确定其功效。最后,我们评估了最有可能预测 UCE 风险的个体患者和临床因素。

结果

我们的研究表明,ML 可以预测 UCE 风险,在训练组和测试组中,UCE 风险约为 5%。我们能够确定患者的风险因素,如患者生命体征、紧急手术、ASA 状态和非手术麻醉时间,这些因素是重要的变量。我们为每位患者绘制了重要变量的 Shapley 值,以帮助确定这些变量中哪些对 UCE 风险的影响最大。值得注意的是,ML 识别的 UCE 风险因素与麻醉师的临床实践和当前文献一致。

结论

我们使用 ML 分析了来自单中心回顾性非心脏手术患者队列的数据,其中一些患者发生了 UCE。ML 为患者发生 UCE 分配了风险预测,并确定了与风险增加相关的围手术期因素。我们提倡使用 ML 来增强麻醉师的临床决策,帮助决定从 PACU 适当的处置,并确保我们的患者得到尽可能安全的护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ee/11266221/3ca4b456cc34/10916_2024_2085_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ee/11266221/47bbef12645f/10916_2024_2085_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ee/11266221/3373dce4fe43/10916_2024_2085_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ee/11266221/3ca4b456cc34/10916_2024_2085_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ee/11266221/47bbef12645f/10916_2024_2085_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ee/11266221/3373dce4fe43/10916_2024_2085_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ee/11266221/3ca4b456cc34/10916_2024_2085_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine Learning Predicts Unplanned Care Escalations for Post-Anesthesia Care Unit Patients during the Perioperative Period: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.机器学习预测围手术期术后恢复室患者非计划性护理升级:单中心回顾性研究。
J Med Syst. 2024 Jul 23;48(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02085-9.
2
Developing models to predict early postoperative patient deterioration and adverse events.开发用于预测术后早期患者病情恶化和不良事件的模型。
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Jun;87(6):457-461. doi: 10.1111/ans.13874. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
3
Prediction of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification from preoperative clinical text narratives using natural language processing.使用自然语言处理技术从术前临床文本叙述中预测美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分类。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Sep 4;23(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02248-0.
4
Developing a Machine Learning Model for Predicting 30-Day Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: Retrospective Study.开发用于预测非心脏手术患者30天主要不良心脑血管事件的机器学习模型:回顾性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 9;27:e66366. doi: 10.2196/66366.
5
Prediction and Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithm for Prediction of Blood Transfusion during Cesarean Section and Analysis of Risk Factors of Hypothermia during Anesthesia Recovery.机器学习算法预测剖宫产术中输血的预测及麻醉恢复期低体温风险因素分析。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Apr 13;2022:8661324. doi: 10.1155/2022/8661324. eCollection 2022.
6
Machine-learning Models Predict 30-Day Mortality, Cardiovascular Complications, and Respiratory Complications After Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.机器学习模型预测无菌翻修全关节置换术后 30 天死亡率、心血管并发症和呼吸系统并发症。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Nov 1;480(11):2137-2145. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002276. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
7
Incidence of complications in the post-anesthesia care unit and associated healthcare utilization in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery requiring neuromuscular blockade 2005-2013: A single center study.2005-2013 年非心脏手术患者行肌松阻滞下麻醉后监护室并发症发生率及相关医疗利用情况:一项单中心研究。
J Clin Anesth. 2017 Dec;43:33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
8
[Hypoxemia after general anesthesia].[全身麻醉后的低氧血症]
Anaesthesist. 2012 Apr;61(4):299-309. doi: 10.1007/s00101-012-2000-x.
9
Development and validation of a machine learning ASA-score to identify candidates for comprehensive preoperative screening and risk stratification.用于识别全面术前筛查和风险分层候选者的机器学习美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分的开发与验证
J Clin Anesth. 2023 Aug;87:111103. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111103. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
10
Development and Validation of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery in Two Centers in China: Retrospective Study.中国两个中心用于预测非心脏手术后心肌损伤的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证:一项回顾性研究
JMIR Aging. 2024 Jul 26;7:e54872. doi: 10.2196/54872.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging advanced graph neural networks for the enhanced classification of post anesthesia states to aid surgical procedures.利用先进的图神经网络增强对麻醉后状态的分类,以辅助外科手术。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 25;20(4):e0320299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320299. eCollection 2025.
2
Using AI to Predict Patients' Length of Stay: PACU Staff's Needs and Expectations for Developing and Implementing an AI System.利用人工智能预测患者住院时间:麻醉后护理单元工作人员对开发和实施人工智能系统的需求与期望
J Nurs Manag. 2024 Nov 14;2024:3189531. doi: 10.1155/jonm/3189531. eCollection 2024.
3
Unveiling the Future of Postoperative Outcomes Prediction: The Role of Machine Learning and Trust in Healthcare.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Prediction Models for Hospital Mortality in General Medical Patients: A Systematic Review.普通内科患者医院死亡率的风险预测模型:一项系统评价。
Am J Med Open. 2023 Dec;10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100044. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
2
Evaluation of machine learning-based models for prediction of clinical deterioration: A systematic literature review.基于机器学习的临床恶化预测模型评估:系统文献回顾。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Jul;175:105084. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105084. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
3
Overtriage, Undertriage, and Value of Care after Major Surgery: An Automated, Explainable Deep Learning-Enabled Classification System.
揭示术后结果预测的未来:机器学习与医疗保健中的信任的作用。
J Med Syst. 2024 Sep 21;48(1):91. doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02106-7.
手术治疗后过度分诊、分诊不足与护理价值:一种自动化、可解释的深度学习赋能分类系统。
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Feb 1;236(2):279-291. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000471. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
4
The association between preoperative anemia, blood transfusion need, and postoperative complications in adult cardiac surgery, a single center contemporary experience.成人心脏手术中术前贫血、输血需求与术后并发症之间的关联:单中心当代经验。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Jan 7;18(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02132-5.
5
Usefulness of discharge standards in outpatients undergoing sedative endoscopy: a propensity score-matched study of the modified post-anesthetic discharge scoring system and the modified Aldrete score.在镇静内镜检查的门诊患者中使用出院标准的效果:改良麻醉后出院评分系统和改良 Aldrete 评分的倾向评分匹配研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 4;22(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02549-7.
6
Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Science in Neurocritical Care.人工智能与神经危重症大数据科学
Crit Care Clin. 2023 Jan;39(1):235-242. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2022.07.008. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
7
Gastro-intestinal emergency surgery: Evaluation of morbidity and mortality. Protocol of a prospective, multicenter study in Italy for evaluating the burden of abdominal emergency surgery in different age groups. (The GESEMM study).胃肠急诊手术:发病率和死亡率评估。意大利一项前瞻性多中心研究方案,用于评估不同年龄组腹部急诊手术的负担。(GESEMM研究)
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 16;9:927044. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.927044. eCollection 2022.
8
Validation of a Deep Learning-based Automatic Detection Algorithm for Measurement of Endotracheal Tube-to-Carina Distance on Chest Radiographs.基于深度学习的自动检测算法对胸片中气管导管至隆突距离测量的验证。
Anesthesiology. 2022 Dec 1;137(6):704-715. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004378.
9
Towards computational solutions for precision medicine based big data healthcare system using deep learning models: A review.基于深度学习模型的精准医学大数据医疗系统的计算解决方案研究进展:综述。
Comput Biol Med. 2022 Oct;149:106020. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106020. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
10
Intensive care unit versus high dependency care unit admission after emergency surgery: a nationwide in-patient registry study.急诊手术后入住重症监护病房与高依赖护理病房:一项全国性住院患者登记研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Oct;129(4):527-535. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.06.030. Epub 2022 Aug 10.