Dube Albert, Mwandira Kondwani, Akter Kohenour, Khatun Fatama, Lemma Seblewengel, Seruwagi Gloria, Shawar Yusra Ribhi, Djellouli Nehla, Mwakwenda Charles, English Mike, Colbourn Tim
Parent and Child Health Initiative Trust (PACHI), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit (MEIRU), Lilongwe, Malawi.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Aug 1;4(8):e0003532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003532. eCollection 2024.
In 2017, WHO and global partners launched 'The Network for Improving Quality of Care for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health' (QCN) seeking to reduce in-facility maternal and newborn deaths and stillbirth by 50% in health facilities by 2022. We explored how the QCN theory of change guided what actually happened over 2018-2022 in order to understand what worked well, what did not, and to ultimately describe the consequences of QCN activities. We applied theory of change analysis criteria to investigate how well-defined, plausible, coherent and measurable the results were, how well-defined, coherent, justifiable, realistic, sustainable and measurable the assumptions were, and how independent and sufficient the causal links were. We found that the QCN theory of change was not used in the same way across implementing countries. While the theory stipulated Leadership, Action, Learning and Accountability as the principle to guide network activity implementation other principles and varying quality improvement methods have also been used; key conditions were missing at service integration and process levels in the global theory of change for the network. Conditions such as lack of physical resources were frequently reported to be preventing adequate care, or harm patient satisfaction. Key partners and implementers were not introduced to the network theory of change early enough for them to raise critical questions about their roles and the need for, and nature of, quality of care interventions. Whilst the theory of change was created at the outset of QCN it is not clear how much it guided actual activities or any monitoring and evaluation as things progressed. Enabling countries to develop their theory of change, perhaps guided by the global framework, could improve stakeholder engagement, allow local evaluation of assumptions and addressing of challenges, and better target QCN work toward achieving its goals.
2017年,世界卫生组织(WHO)与全球合作伙伴发起了“改善孕产妇、新生儿和儿童保健质量网络”(QCN),力求到2022年将医疗机构内的孕产妇和新生儿死亡及死产率降低50%。我们探究了QCN的变革理论如何指导2018年至2022年期间实际发生的情况,以便了解哪些方面成效良好、哪些方面不佳,并最终描述QCN活动的结果。我们运用变革理论分析标准,调查结果的定义是否明确、是否合理、是否连贯且可衡量,假设的定义是否明确、是否连贯、是否合理、是否现实、是否可持续且可衡量,以及因果关系是否独立且充分。我们发现,不同的实施国家对QCN变革理论的运用方式并不相同。虽然该理论规定将领导力、行动、学习和问责制作为指导网络活动实施的原则,但也采用了其他原则和不同的质量改进方法;在该网络全球变革理论的服务整合和流程层面缺少关键条件。诸如缺乏物质资源等情况经常被报告为妨碍提供充分护理或损害患者满意度。关键合作伙伴和实施者没有足够早地接触到该网络的变革理论,以至于他们无法就自身角色以及护理质量干预措施的必要性和性质提出关键问题。虽然变革理论在QCN启动时就已创建,但随着事情的进展,尚不清楚它在多大程度上指导了实际活动或任何监测与评估。让各国在全球框架的指导下制定自己的变革理论,可能会提高利益相关者的参与度,允许对假设进行本地评估并应对挑战,并使QCN的工作更好地朝着实现其目标的方向发展。