• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Opportunities to sustain a multi-country quality of care network: Lessons on the actions of four countries Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda.维持多国医疗质量网络的机遇:孟加拉国、埃塞俄比亚、马拉维和乌干达四个国家行动的经验教训
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Sep 12;3(9):e0001672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001672. eCollection 2023.
2
Do global health networks facilitate innovation, learning and sharing? A qualitative analysis of the Quality-of-Care Network in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda.全球卫生网络是否促进创新、学习和共享?对孟加拉国、埃塞俄比亚、马拉维和乌干达的医疗质量网络的定性分析。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jan 29;5(1):e0002720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002720. eCollection 2025.
3
Influences on policy-formulation, decision-making, organisation and management for maternal, newborn and child health in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi and Uganda: The roles and legitimacy of a multi-country network.孟加拉国、埃塞俄比亚、马拉维和乌干达孕产妇、新生儿及儿童健康政策制定、决策、组织与管理所受的影响:一个多国网络的作用及合法性
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Nov 21;3(11):e0001742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001742. eCollection 2023.
4
Effectiveness of a multi-country implementation-focused network on quality of care: Delivery of interventions and processes for improved maternal, newborn and child health outcomes.一个注重多国实施的网络对医疗质量的有效性:为改善孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康结果提供干预措施和流程。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Mar 4;4(3):e0001751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001751. eCollection 2024.
5
Factors shaping network emergence: A cross-country comparison of quality of care networks in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda.塑造网络形成的因素:孟加拉国、埃塞俄比亚、马拉维和乌干达医疗服务网络质量的跨国比较
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jul 23;4(7):e0001839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001839. eCollection 2024.
6
Individual interactions in a multi-country implementation-focused quality of care network for maternal, newborn and child health: A social network analysis.多国以实施为重点的孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康护理质量网络中的个体互动:一项社会网络分析。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Sep 21;3(9):e0001769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001769. eCollection 2023.
7
Individual, organizational and system circumstances, and the functioning of a multi-country implementation-focused network for maternal, newborn and child health: Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda.个体、组织和系统情况,以及一个以多国实施为重点的孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康网络的运作:孟加拉国、埃塞俄比亚、马拉维和乌干达。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jul 10;3(7):e0002115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002115. eCollection 2023.
8
"We don't trust all data coming from all facilities": factors influencing the quality of care network data quality in Ethiopia.“我们不相信所有来自所有医疗机构的数据”:影响埃塞俄比亚护理网络数据质量的因素。
Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2279856. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2279856. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
9
How to evaluate a multi-country implementation-focused network: Reflections from the Quality of Care Network (QCN) evaluation.如何评估一个以多国实施为重点的网络:来自医疗质量网络(QCN)评估的思考。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Aug 29;4(8):e0001897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001897. eCollection 2024.
10
Building a culture of quality in maternal and newborn health: experience from the quality, equity and dignity network in Ethiopia.构建孕产妇和新生儿健康领域的质量文化:埃塞俄比亚质量、公平与尊严网络的经验
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2433576. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2433576. Epub 2024 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Do global health networks facilitate innovation, learning and sharing? A qualitative analysis of the Quality-of-Care Network in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda.全球卫生网络是否促进创新、学习和共享?对孟加拉国、埃塞俄比亚、马拉维和乌干达的医疗质量网络的定性分析。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jan 29;5(1):e0002720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002720. eCollection 2025.
2
Building a culture of quality in maternal and newborn health: experience from the quality, equity and dignity network in Ethiopia.构建孕产妇和新生儿健康领域的质量文化:埃塞俄比亚质量、公平与尊严网络的经验
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2433576. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2433576. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
3
Evaluating theory of change to improve the functioning of the network for improving quality of care for maternal, newborn and child health.评估变革理论,以改善孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康护理质量提升网络的运作。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Aug 1;4(8):e0003532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003532. eCollection 2024.
4
Factors shaping network emergence: A cross-country comparison of quality of care networks in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda.塑造网络形成的因素:孟加拉国、埃塞俄比亚、马拉维和乌干达医疗服务网络质量的跨国比较
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jul 23;4(7):e0001839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001839. eCollection 2024.
5
Effectiveness of a multi-country implementation-focused network on quality of care: Delivery of interventions and processes for improved maternal, newborn and child health outcomes.一个注重多国实施的网络对医疗质量的有效性:为改善孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康结果提供干预措施和流程。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Mar 4;4(3):e0001751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001751. eCollection 2024.
6
Influences on policy-formulation, decision-making, organisation and management for maternal, newborn and child health in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi and Uganda: The roles and legitimacy of a multi-country network.孟加拉国、埃塞俄比亚、马拉维和乌干达孕产妇、新生儿及儿童健康政策制定、决策、组织与管理所受的影响:一个多国网络的作用及合法性
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Nov 21;3(11):e0001742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001742. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of a multi-country implementation-focused network on quality of care: Delivery of interventions and processes for improved maternal, newborn and child health outcomes.一个注重多国实施的网络对医疗质量的有效性:为改善孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康结果提供干预措施和流程。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Mar 4;4(3):e0001751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001751. eCollection 2024.
2
Influences on policy-formulation, decision-making, organisation and management for maternal, newborn and child health in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi and Uganda: The roles and legitimacy of a multi-country network.孟加拉国、埃塞俄比亚、马拉维和乌干达孕产妇、新生儿及儿童健康政策制定、决策、组织与管理所受的影响:一个多国网络的作用及合法性
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Nov 21;3(11):e0001742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001742. eCollection 2023.
3
'A seamless transition': how to sustain a community health worker scheme within the health system of Gombe state, northeast Nigeria.“无缝过渡”:如何在尼日利亚东北部贡贝州的卫生系统内维持社区卫生工作者计划。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Aug 12;36(7):1067-1076. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab063.
4
Global age-sex-specific fertility, mortality, healthy life expectancy (HALE), and population estimates in 204 countries and territories, 1950-2019: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.204 个国家和地区 1950-2019 年全球年龄性别特定生育率、死亡率、健康期望寿命(HALE)和人口估计值:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的综合人口分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1160-1203. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30977-6.
5
Community Ownership in Primary Health Care-Managing the Intangible.社区所有制在初级卫生保健中的作用——管理无形资源
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020 Sep 30;8(3):327-331. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00427.
6
Evidence-based intervention sustainability strategies: a systematic review.循证干预可持续性策略:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 6;14(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0910-6.
7
Sustainability of public health interventions: where are the gaps?公共卫生干预措施的可持续性:差距在哪里?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 15;17(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0405-y.
8
Mortality due to low-quality health systems in the universal health coverage era: a systematic analysis of amenable deaths in 137 countries.全民健康覆盖时代低质量卫生系统导致的死亡:137 个国家可避免死亡的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 17;392(10160):2203-2212. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31668-4. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
9
"It's About the Idea Hitting the Bull's Eye": How Aid Effectiveness Can Catalyse the Scale-up of Health Innovations.“关键在于想法要正中靶心”:援助效果如何能够促进卫生创新的推广。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Aug 1;7(8):718-727. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.08.
10
'The development sector is a graveyard of pilot projects!' Six critical actions for externally funded implementers to foster scale-up of maternal and newborn health innovations in low and middle-income countries.“发展领域是试点项目的坟场!” 为促进中低收入国家母婴健康创新扩大规模,外部供资实施方的六项关键行动。
Global Health. 2018 Jul 27;14(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0389-y.

维持多国医疗质量网络的机遇:孟加拉国、埃塞俄比亚、马拉维和乌干达四个国家行动的经验教训

Opportunities to sustain a multi-country quality of care network: Lessons on the actions of four countries Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda.

作者信息

Lemma Seblewengel, Daniels-Howell Callie, Tufa Asebe Amenu, Sarker Mithun, Akter Kohenour, Nakidde Catherine, Seruwagi Gloria, Dube Albert, Mwandira Kondwani, Taye Desalegn Bekele, English Mike, Shawar Yusra Ribhi, Mwaba Kasonde, Djellouli Nehla, Colbourn Tim, Marchant Tanya

机构信息

Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, based in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Sep 12;3(9):e0001672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001672. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001672
PMID:37698985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10497147/
Abstract

The Quality of Care Network (QCN) is a global initiative that was established in 2017 under the leadership of WHO in 11 low-and- middle income countries to improve maternal, newborn, and child health. The vision was that the Quality of Care Network would be embedded within member countries and continued beyond the initial implementation period: that the Network would be sustained. This paper investigated the experience of actions taken to sustain QCN in four Network countries (Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda) and reports on lessons learned. Multiple iterative rounds of data collection were conducted through qualitative interviews with global and national stakeholders, and non-participatory observation of health facilities and meetings. A total of 241 interviews, 42 facility and four meeting observations were carried out. We conducted a thematic analysis of all data using a framework approach that defined six critical actions that can be taken to promote sustainability. The analysis revealed that these critical actions were present with varying degrees in each of the four countries. Although vulnerabilities were observed, there was good evidence to support that actions were taken to institutionalize the innovation within the health system, to motivate micro-level actors, plan opportunities for reflection and adaptation from the outset, and to support strong government ownership. Two actions were largely absent and weakened confidence in future sustainability: managing financial uncertainties and fostering community ownership. Evidence from four countries suggested that the QCN model would not be sustained in its original format, largely because of financial vulnerability and insufficient time to embed the innovation at the sub-national level. But especially the efforts made to institutionalize the innovation in existing systems meant that some characteristics of QCN may be carried forward within broader government quality improvement initiatives.

摘要

医疗质量网络(QCN)是一项全球倡议,于2017年在世卫组织的领导下,在11个低收入和中等收入国家启动,旨在改善孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康。其愿景是医疗质量网络能够融入成员国,并在初始实施期之后持续存在:即该网络能够得以维持。本文调查了四个网络国家(孟加拉国、埃塞俄比亚、马拉维和乌干达)为维持QCN所采取行动的经验,并报告了所吸取的教训。通过对全球和国家利益相关者进行定性访谈,以及对卫生设施和会议进行非参与式观察,开展了多轮迭代数据收集。总共进行了241次访谈、42次设施观察和4次会议观察。我们使用一种框架方法对所有数据进行了主题分析,该方法定义了六项可采取的促进可持续性的关键行动。分析表明,这六项关键行动在四个国家中均有不同程度的体现。尽管发现了一些薄弱环节,但有充分证据支持已采取行动将这一创新举措在卫生系统中制度化,激励微观层面的行为主体,从一开始就规划反思和调整的机会,并支持政府的有力主导。有两项行动基本缺失,削弱了对未来可持续性的信心:管理财务不确定性和促进社区参与。来自四个国家的证据表明,QCN模式无法以其原始形式维持下去,主要原因是财务脆弱性以及在国家以下层面嵌入这一创新举措的时间不足。但特别是在现有系统中将创新举措制度化所做的努力意味着QCN的一些特点可能会在更广泛的政府质量改进举措中得以延续。