相似文献
1
Science over language: a plea to consider language bias in scientific publishing.
Crit Care Sci. 2024 Jul 19;36:e20240084en. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240084-en. eCollection 2024.
2
Beyond style guides: suggestions for better scientific English.
Acta Histochem. 2005;107(3):157-60. doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2005.06.001.
3
Publish or perish.
Nature. 2010 Sep 16;467(7313):252. doi: 10.1038/467252a.
4
How to write and publish a successful scientific article.
Ultraschall Med. 2007 Oct;28(5):472-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963559.
5
Impact and relevance of the journal: Publishing in English and large number of unique visits.
Medwave. 2015 Nov 3;15(10):e6301. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2015.10.6301.
6
[Spanish language].
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2004 Apr;96(4):288. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082004000400012.
7
Successful publishing: how to get your paper accepted.
Surg Oncol. 2009 Dec;18(4):350-6. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Oct 11.
8
Scientific publishing. Data integrity report sends journals back to the drawing board.
Science. 2009 Jul 24;325(5939):381. doi: 10.1126/science.325_381.
9
An unbiased scientific record should be everyone's agenda.
PLoS Med. 2009 Feb 24;6(2):e1000038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000038.
10
[A surge of pride for upholding French-language journals?].
Chir Main. 2000 Jul;19(3):143-4. doi: 10.1016/s1297-3203(00)73472-x.
引用本文的文献
1
Where should I publish my scientific article? Insights from the editors of Critical Care Science and Critical Care Resuscitation.
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Aug 4;37:e20250188. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250188. eCollection 2025.
2
Peer review for medical journals: why and how?
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Jun 30;37:e20250098. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250098. eCollection 2025.
3
To: Science over language: a plea to consider language bias in scientific publishing.
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Jun 16;37:e20250027. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250027. eCollection 2025.
4
Engaging Underserved Populations in Health Preference Research: Challenges and Strategies.
Patient. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00745-7.
5
Closing the critical care knowledge gap: the importance of publications from low-income and middle-income countries.
Crit Care Sci. 2024 Dec 2;36:e20240251eden. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240251ed-en. eCollection 2024.
6
Improving English proficiency for scientific communication by non-fluent speakers.
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025 Mar;22(3):141-142. doi: 10.1038/s41569-024-01102-1.
本文引用的文献
1
Open-access publications: a double-edged sword for critical care researchers in lowand middle-income countries.
Crit Care Sci. 2023 Oct-Dec;35(4):342-344. doi: 10.5935/2965-2774.20230263-en.
2
Cytokine hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Crit Care Sci. 2023 Apr-Jun;35(2):217-225. doi: 10.5935/2965-2774.20230289-en.
3
The predictive value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in normotensive critically ill septic patients.
Crit Care Sci. 2023 Apr-Jun;35(2):187-195. doi: 10.5935/2965-2774.20230378-en.
4
The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science.
PLoS Biol. 2023 Jul 18;21(7):e3002184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002184. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Peer review perpetuates barriers for historically excluded groups.
Nat Ecol Evol. 2023 Apr;7(4):512-523. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-01999-w. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
6
Ten tips for overcoming language barriers in science.
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Sep;5(9):1119-1122. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01137-1.
7
Preliminary evidence of linguistic bias in academic reviewing.
J Engl Acad Purp. 2020 Sep;47. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100895. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
8
Language bias discredits the peer-review system.
Nature. 1999 Feb 11;397(6719):467. doi: 10.1038/17194.
Zotero 插件