Science over language: a plea to consider language bias in scientific publishing.
作者信息
González-Dambrauskas Sebastián, Salluh Jorge Ibrain Figueira, Machado Flávia Ribeiro, Rotta Alexandre Tellechea
机构信息
Red Colaborativa Pediátrica de Latinoamérica (LARed Network) - Montevideo, Uruguay.
Departamento de Pediatría y Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos de Niños, Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República - Montevideo, Uruguay.
出版信息
Crit Care Sci. 2024 Jul 19;36:e20240084en. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240084-en. eCollection 2024.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Science over language: a plea to consider language bias in scientific publishing.科学高于语言：呼吁关注科学出版中的语言偏见
Crit Care Sci. 2024 Jul 19;36:e20240084en. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240084-en. eCollection 2024.
2
Beyond style guides: suggestions for better scientific English.超越风格指南：提升科技英语水平的建议
Acta Histochem. 2005;107(3):157-60. doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2005.06.001.
3
Publish or perish.不发表就灭亡。
Nature. 2010 Sep 16;467(7313):252. doi: 10.1038/467252a.
4
How to write and publish a successful scientific article.如何撰写并发表一篇成功的科学论文。
Ultraschall Med. 2007 Oct;28(5):472-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963559.
5
Impact and relevance of the journal: Publishing in English and large number of unique visits.该期刊的影响力与相关性：英文出版及大量独立访问量。
Medwave. 2015 Nov 3;15(10):e6301. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2015.10.6301.
6
[Spanish language].[西班牙语]
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2004 Apr;96(4):288. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082004000400012.
7
Successful publishing: how to get your paper accepted.成功发表：如何让你的论文被录用。
Surg Oncol. 2009 Dec;18(4):350-6. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Oct 11.
8
Scientific publishing. Data integrity report sends journals back to the drawing board.科学出版。数据完整性报告让期刊重新回到了绘图板前。
Science. 2009 Jul 24;325(5939):381. doi: 10.1126/science.325_381.
9
An unbiased scientific record should be everyone's agenda.一份公正的科学记录应该是每个人的议程。
PLoS Med. 2009 Feb 24;6(2):e1000038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000038.
10
[A surge of pride for upholding French-language journals?].[因维护法语期刊而涌起的自豪感？]
Chir Main. 2000 Jul;19(3):143-4. doi: 10.1016/s1297-3203(00)73472-x.
引用本文的文献
1
Where should I publish my scientific article? Insights from the editors of Critical Care Science and Critical Care Resuscitation.我应该在哪里发表我的科学文章？来自《重症监护科学》和《重症监护复苏》编辑的见解。
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Aug 4;37:e20250188. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250188. eCollection 2025.
2
Peer review for medical journals: why and how?医学期刊的同行评议：为何及如何进行？
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Jun 30;37:e20250098. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250098. eCollection 2025.
3
To: Science over language: a plea to consider language bias in scientific publishing.致：科学超越语言：呼吁关注科学出版中的语言偏见。
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Jun 16;37:e20250027. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250027. eCollection 2025.
4
Engaging Underserved Populations in Health Preference Research: Challenges and Strategies.让服务不足人群参与健康偏好研究：挑战与策略
Patient. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00745-7.
5
Closing the critical care knowledge gap: the importance of publications from low-income and middle-income countries.缩小重症监护知识差距：低收入和中等收入国家出版物的重要性。
Crit Care Sci. 2024 Dec 2;36:e20240251eden. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240251ed-en. eCollection 2024.
6
Improving English proficiency for scientific communication by non-fluent speakers.非英语流利者提高科学交流英语水平的方法。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025 Mar;22(3):141-142. doi: 10.1038/s41569-024-01102-1.
本文引用的文献
1
Open-access publications: a double-edged sword for critical care researchers in lowand middle-income countries.开放获取出版物：低收入和中等收入国家重症监护研究人员的双刃剑。
Crit Care Sci. 2023 Oct-Dec;35(4):342-344. doi: 10.5935/2965-2774.20230263-en.
2
Cytokine hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.细胞因子血液吸附治疗脓毒症患者：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Sci. 2023 Apr-Jun;35(2):217-225. doi: 10.5935/2965-2774.20230289-en.
3
The predictive value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in normotensive critically ill septic patients.左心室整体纵向应变在血压正常的危重症脓毒症患者中的预测价值。
Crit Care Sci. 2023 Apr-Jun;35(2):187-195. doi: 10.5935/2965-2774.20230378-en.
4
The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science.非英语母语者在科学领域的多重代价。
PLoS Biol. 2023 Jul 18;21(7):e3002184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002184. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Peer review perpetuates barriers for historically excluded groups.同行评审使历史上被排斥的群体面临障碍。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2023 Apr;7(4):512-523. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-01999-w. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
6
Ten tips for overcoming language barriers in science.克服科学领域语言障碍的十点建议。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Sep;5(9):1119-1122. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01137-1.
7
Preliminary evidence of linguistic bias in academic reviewing.学术评审中语言偏见的初步证据。
J Engl Acad Purp. 2020 Sep;47. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100895. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
8
Language bias discredits the peer-review system.语言偏见损害了同行评审系统的声誉。
Nature. 1999 Feb 11;397(6719):467. doi: 10.1038/17194.
Zotero 插件