Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA 11794.
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA 11794; Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Northport, NY 11768, USA.
Cell Signal. 2024 Oct;122:111307. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2024.111307. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
The kinase domains of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are highly conserved, yet they are able to discriminate among potential substrates to selectively activate downstream signaling pathways. In this study, we tested the importance of catalytic domain specificity by creating two series of chimeric RTKs. In one set, the kinase domain of insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF1R) was replaced by the kinase domains from insulin receptor (IR), macrophage stimulating protein 1 receptor/Ron (Ron) or Src. In the other set of chimeras, the kinase domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was similarly replaced by the kinase domains of IR, Ron, or Src. We expressed the wild-type and chimeric forms of the receptors in mammalian cells. For some signaling events, such as recognition of IRS1, the identity of the tyrosine kinase catalytic domain did not appear to be crucial. In contrast, recognition of some sites, such as the C-terminal autophosphorylation sites on EGFR, did depend on the identity of the kinase domain. Our data also showed that ligand dependence was lost when the native kinase domains were replaced by Src, suggesting that the identity of the kinase domains could be important for proper receptor regulation. Overall, the results are consistent with the idea that the fidelity of RTK signaling depends on co-localization and targeting with substrates, as well as on the intrinsic specificity of the kinase domain.
受体酪氨酸激酶 (RTKs) 的激酶结构域高度保守,但它们能够区分潜在的底物,从而选择性地激活下游信号通路。在这项研究中,我们通过创建两种嵌合 RTK 系列来测试催化结构域特异性的重要性。在一组中,胰岛素样生长因子 I 受体 (IGF1R) 的激酶结构域被胰岛素受体 (IR)、巨噬细胞刺激蛋白 1 受体/Ron (Ron) 或Src 的激酶结构域取代。在另一组嵌合体中,表皮生长因子受体 (EGFR) 的激酶结构域被 IR、Ron 或 Src 的激酶结构域类似地取代。我们在哺乳动物细胞中表达了野生型和嵌合形式的受体。对于某些信号事件,例如 IRS1 的识别,酪氨酸激酶催化结构域的身份似乎并不重要。相比之下,一些位点的识别,如 EGFR 的 C 末端自身磷酸化位点,确实取决于激酶结构域的身份。我们的数据还表明,当用 Src 取代天然激酶结构域时,配体依赖性丧失,这表明激酶结构域的身份对于适当的受体调节可能很重要。总的来说,这些结果与 RTK 信号的保真度取决于与底物的共定位和靶向以及激酶结构域的固有特异性的观点一致。