• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

室内疏散中性别差异下情境效应对人群出口选择影响的调查

An investigation into the influence of context effects on crowd exit selection under gender difference in indoor evacuation.

作者信息

Teng Qi, Wang Xuan, He Wu, Pan Gaofeng, Mao Yan

机构信息

School of Business, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China.

School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 10;15:1417738. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1417738. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1417738
PMID:39049949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11266176/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Exit selection is crucial in indoor emergency evacuation. Domestic and foreign scholars have found that exit choice behavior is influenced by three factors: environmental factors, social interactions, and individual internal factors. Previous studies have shown that in addition to a single environmental factor affecting exit decisions, the influence of other available exit options in the context can ultimately lead to a reversal of exit decisions -The context effect. However, the impact of context effects on exit decisions in emergency situations has not been thoroughly explored. Therefore, this article identifies three basic independent variables: context effects, crowd flows, and gender differences, to study the exit decisions of different gender groups facing different crowd flows, as well as how context effects affect existing exit decisions.

METHODS

In this paper, we used virtual reality technology to construct an indoor fire scene and designed a total of 15 virtual experiments with different crowd distribution or context effects. 131 participants were divided into two groups, male and female, and their exit decisions were observed under different crowd flows and contextual effects.

RESULTS

The research results show that: 1) Both men and women have an innate preference to avoid crowded exits, and the proportion of following crowd evacuation significantly decreases when there are crowded crowds in the scene; 2) The exit decisions of female participants are more influenced by the crowd, while men tend to be more influenced by context effects when evacuating independently; 3) The context effects on exit decisions in emergency situations is statistically significant, and this performance is more significant in the male population. Further analysis reveals that similarity effects have a more significant impact on exit decisions than attraction effects.

DISCUSSIONS

These findings provide deeper insights into the exit choice behavior of the population and may contribute to the design of safe exits in indoor buildings. In addition, this article emphasizes the importance of context effects and provides a foundation for future research.

摘要

引言

出口选择在室内紧急疏散中至关重要。国内外学者发现,出口选择行为受环境因素、社会互动和个体内在因素三个因素影响。以往研究表明,除单一环境因素影响出口决策外,情境中其他可用出口选项的影响最终可能导致出口决策的逆转——情境效应。然而,情境效应在紧急情况下对出口决策的影响尚未得到充分探讨。因此,本文确定了三个基本自变量:情境效应、人群流动和性别差异,以研究不同性别群体在面对不同人群流动时的出口决策,以及情境效应如何影响现有出口决策。

方法

本文利用虚拟现实技术构建室内火灾场景,共设计了15个不同人群分布或情境效应的虚拟实验。131名参与者分为男性和女性两组,观察他们在不同人群流动和情境效应下的出口决策。

结果

研究结果表明:1)男性和女性都有避免拥挤出口的固有偏好,当场景中有拥挤人群时,跟随人群疏散的比例显著下降;2)女性参与者的出口决策受人群影响更大,而男性在独立疏散时往往受情境效应影响更大;3)情境效应在紧急情况下对出口决策具有统计学意义,且这种表现在男性群体中更为显著。进一步分析表明,相似性效应比吸引效应对出口决策的影响更大。

讨论

这些发现为人群的出口选择行为提供了更深入的见解,可能有助于室内建筑安全出口的设计。此外,本文强调了情境效应的重要性,并为未来研究奠定了基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/41033e5c1f07/fpsyg-15-1417738-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/14843a035f62/fpsyg-15-1417738-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/fcaf71fa1f15/fpsyg-15-1417738-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/7439f59d7b5f/fpsyg-15-1417738-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/dfeffed17bc5/fpsyg-15-1417738-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/3309daa1abfc/fpsyg-15-1417738-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/d520bb227613/fpsyg-15-1417738-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/85facc9b69b8/fpsyg-15-1417738-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/7c739aff8b2d/fpsyg-15-1417738-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/67bce823fe19/fpsyg-15-1417738-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/5b95154f9f15/fpsyg-15-1417738-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/c76719e1ef94/fpsyg-15-1417738-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/3644f9df40a8/fpsyg-15-1417738-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/44db84ee0fca/fpsyg-15-1417738-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/f0285dd8db4e/fpsyg-15-1417738-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/41033e5c1f07/fpsyg-15-1417738-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/14843a035f62/fpsyg-15-1417738-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/fcaf71fa1f15/fpsyg-15-1417738-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/7439f59d7b5f/fpsyg-15-1417738-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/dfeffed17bc5/fpsyg-15-1417738-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/3309daa1abfc/fpsyg-15-1417738-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/d520bb227613/fpsyg-15-1417738-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/85facc9b69b8/fpsyg-15-1417738-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/7c739aff8b2d/fpsyg-15-1417738-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/67bce823fe19/fpsyg-15-1417738-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/5b95154f9f15/fpsyg-15-1417738-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/c76719e1ef94/fpsyg-15-1417738-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/3644f9df40a8/fpsyg-15-1417738-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/44db84ee0fca/fpsyg-15-1417738-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/f0285dd8db4e/fpsyg-15-1417738-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ee/11266176/41033e5c1f07/fpsyg-15-1417738-g015.jpg

相似文献

1
An investigation into the influence of context effects on crowd exit selection under gender difference in indoor evacuation.室内疏散中性别差异下情境效应对人群出口选择影响的调查
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 10;15:1417738. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1417738. eCollection 2024.
2
Exit choice during evacuation is influenced by both the size and proportion of the egressing crowd.疏散过程中的出口选择受到疏散人群规模和比例的影响。
Physica A. 2021 May 1;569. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2021.125746. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
3
Self-Organized Crowd Dynamics: Research on Earthquake Emergency Response Patterns of Drill-Trained Individuals Based on GIS and Multi-Agent Systems Methodology.自组织人群动态:基于 GIS 和多智能体系统方法的演练个体地震应急响应模式研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Feb 14;21(4):1353. doi: 10.3390/s21041353.
4
Human responses to multiple sources of directional information in virtual crowd evacuations.人类对虚拟人群疏散中多种方向信息源的反应。
J R Soc Interface. 2013 Nov 20;11(91):20130904. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0904. Print 2014 Feb 6.
5
How Simple Hypothetical-Choice Experiments Can Be Utilized to Learn Humans' Navigational Escape Decisions in Emergencies.简单的假设选择实验如何用于了解人类在紧急情况下的导航逃生决策。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 21;11(11):e0166908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166908. eCollection 2016.
6
Information use by humans during dynamic route choice in virtual crowd evacuations.虚拟人群疏散中动态路径选择过程中人类的信息使用情况。
R Soc Open Sci. 2015 Jan 21;2(1):140410. doi: 10.1098/rsos.140410. eCollection 2015 Jan.
7
An Entropy-Based Combined Behavior Model for Crowd Evacuation.一种基于熵的人群疏散联合行为模型。
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Oct 17;24(10):1479. doi: 10.3390/e24101479.
8
An enhanced multi-attribute crowd evacuation model incorporating the effects of environmental impact factors.一种纳入环境影响因素效应的增强型多属性人群疏散模型。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 12;10(4):e26299. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26299. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
9
LED Wristbands for Cell-Based Crowd Evacuation: An Adaptive Exit-Choice Guidance System Architecture.基于细胞的人群疏散用 LED 腕带:一种自适应出口选择引导系统架构。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Oct 23;20(21):6038. doi: 10.3390/s20216038.
10
Social influence in a virtual tunnel fire--influence of conflicting information on evacuation behavior.虚拟隧道火灾中的社会影响——冲突信息对疏散行为的影响
Appl Ergon. 2014 Nov;45(6):1649-59. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.05.014. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

本文引用的文献

1
How similarity between choice options affects decisions from experience: The accentuation-of-differences model.选择项之间的相似性如何影响基于经验的决策:差异突显模型。
Psychol Rev. 2019 Jan;126(1):52-88. doi: 10.1037/rev0000122.
2
The comparison process as an account of variation in the attraction, compromise, and similarity effects.比较过程作为吸引力、妥协和相似性效应变化的解释。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Jun;26(3):934-942. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1531-9.
3
Gender and Emotion Expression: A Developmental Contextual Perspective.性别与情绪表达:一种发展情境视角
Emot Rev. 2015 Jan;7(1):14-21. doi: 10.1177/1754073914544408.
4
The multiattribute linear ballistic accumulator model of context effects in multialternative choice.多选项选择中情境效应的多属性线性弹道累加器模型
Psychol Rev. 2014 Apr;121(2):179-205. doi: 10.1037/a0036137.
5
Behavioral compliance for dynamic versus static signs in an immersive virtual environment.沉浸式虚拟环境中动态与静态标志的行为依从性
Appl Ergon. 2014 Sep;45(5):1367-75. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
6
Not just for consumers: context effects are fundamental to decision making.不仅对消费者而言:情境效应是决策的基础。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun;24(6):901-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797612464241. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
7
How gender and task difficulty affect a sport-protective response in young adults.性别和任务难度如何影响年轻人的运动保护反应。
J Sports Sci. 2013;31(7):723-30. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.746726. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
8
Clinical features and treatment in patients with acute 2,4-dinitrophenol poisoning.急性 2,4-二硝基苯酚中毒患者的临床特征和治疗。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2011 Mar;12(3):189-92. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1000265.
9
The impact of prior risk experiences on subsequent risky decision-making: the role of the insula.先前风险经验对后续风险决策的影响:脑岛的作用。
Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 1;50(2):709-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.097. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
10
Herding in humans.人类中的从众行为。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Oct;13(10):420-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.002. Epub 2009 Sep 11.