• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。

Commodity risk assessment of plants from United Kingdom.

作者信息

Bragard Claude, Baptista Paula, Chatzivassiliou Elisavet, Gonthier Paolo, Jaques Miret Josep Anton, Justesen Annemarie Fejer, MacLeod Alan, Magnusson Christer Sven, Milonas Panagiotis, Navas-Cortes Juan A, Parnell Stephen, Potting Roel, Reignault Philippe Lucien, Stefani Emilio, Thulke Hans-Hermann, Van der Werf Wopke, Civera Antonio Vicent, Zappalà Lucia, Lucchi Andrea, Gómez Pedro, Urek Gregor, Bernardo Umberto, Bubici Giovanni, Carluccio Anna Vittoria, Chiumenti Michela, Di Serio Francesco, Fanelli Elena, Cristina Marzachì Paraskevi Kariampa, Correia Cristiana Do Vale, Mosbach-Schulz Olaf, Kaczmarek Agata, Yuen Jonathan

出版信息

EFSA J. 2024 Jul 24;22(7):e8893. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8893. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8893
PMID:39050027
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11267173/
Abstract

The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as 'High risk plants, plant products and other objects'. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by potted plants and bundles of bare-root plants or cell grown young plants or graftwood/budwood of imported from the United Kingdom, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by the UK. All pests associated with the commodities were evaluated against specific criteria for their relevance for this opinion. One quarantine pest, , one protected zone quarantine pest (European population) and one non-regulated pest, the scale that fulfilled all relevant criteria were selected for further evaluation. The risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical Dossier from the UK were evaluated, taking into account the possible limiting factors. For these pests, expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom, taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The degree of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with being the pest most frequently expected on the imported potted plants. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated with 95% certainty that between 9981 and 10,000 plants per 10,000 would be free from the above-mentioned scale.

摘要

欧盟委员会要求欧洲食品安全局植物健康小组对欧盟委员会实施条例(EU)2018/2019中列为“高风险植物、植物产品及其他物品”的商品进行风险评估。本科学意见涵盖了从英国进口的盆栽植物、裸根植物束或细胞培养的幼苗或接穗/芽条所带来的植物健康风险,同时考虑了现有的科学信息,包括英国提供的技术信息。针对与这些商品相关的所有有害生物,根据与本意见相关性的特定标准进行了评估。选择了一种检疫性有害生物、一种保护区检疫性有害生物(欧洲种群)和一种非管制性有害生物——满足所有相关标准的蚧壳虫进行进一步评估。考虑到可能的限制因素,对英国技术档案中提出的风险缓解措施进行了评估。对于这些有害生物,在考虑作用于有害生物的风险缓解措施(包括与评估相关的不确定性)的情况下,给出了关于有害生物无疫情可能性的专家判断。在所评估的有害生物中,无疫情程度各不相同,蚧壳虫是进口盆栽植物上最常预期出现的有害生物。专家知识 elicitation表明,有95%的确定性,每10000株植物中有9981至10000株将不会出现上述蚧壳虫。 (注:原文中“Expert Knowledge Elicitation”未准确翻译,可根据具体语境进一步优化,这里暂保留英文表述;“scale”根据上下文推测为“蚧壳虫”,但不确定是否准确)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/89df1edabf62/EFS2-22-e8893-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/fb60fd6ca2e8/EFS2-22-e8893-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/42fdcc6731a4/EFS2-22-e8893-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/1cc791b2a275/EFS2-22-e8893-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/1f034426e97f/EFS2-22-e8893-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/9e386d1afe81/EFS2-22-e8893-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/1deca3a23758/EFS2-22-e8893-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/7f9a099d880c/EFS2-22-e8893-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/f731b771472c/EFS2-22-e8893-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/6c53899a7457/EFS2-22-e8893-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/b8b3f7913056/EFS2-22-e8893-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/5ca2d3332fdf/EFS2-22-e8893-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/89df1edabf62/EFS2-22-e8893-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/fb60fd6ca2e8/EFS2-22-e8893-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/42fdcc6731a4/EFS2-22-e8893-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/1cc791b2a275/EFS2-22-e8893-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/1f034426e97f/EFS2-22-e8893-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/9e386d1afe81/EFS2-22-e8893-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/1deca3a23758/EFS2-22-e8893-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/7f9a099d880c/EFS2-22-e8893-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/f731b771472c/EFS2-22-e8893-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/6c53899a7457/EFS2-22-e8893-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/b8b3f7913056/EFS2-22-e8893-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/5ca2d3332fdf/EFS2-22-e8893-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908d/11267173/89df1edabf62/EFS2-22-e8893-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Commodity risk assessment of plants from United Kingdom.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 24;22(7):e8893. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8893. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Commodity risk assessment of plants from United Kingdom.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 3;22(7):e8836. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8836. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Commodity risk assessment of plants from United Kingdom.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2023 May 12;21(5):e08002. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8002. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Commodity risk assessment of plants from United Kingdom.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Jun 19;21(6):e08076. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8076. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Commodity risk assessment of and plants from the UK.来自英国的[具体植物名称1]和[具体植物名称2]的商品风险评估。 (你原文中“and”前后植物名称缺失,我按格式补充了[具体植物名称1]和[具体植物名称2])
EFSA J. 2024 Mar 7;22(3):e8648. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8648. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Commodity risk assessment of and plants from Türkiye.来自土耳其的[具体植物名称1]和[具体植物名称2]的商品风险评估。 (你原文中植物名称部分缺失,这里补充了[具体植物名称1]和[具体植物名称2],请根据实际情况修改)
EFSA J. 2023 Jan 19;21(1):e07735. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7735. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
Commodity risk assessment of specified species of potted plants from .来自……的特定种类盆栽植物的商品风险评估
EFSA J. 2022 Jan 18;20(1):e07014. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7014. eCollection 2022 Jan.
8
Commodity risk assessment of plants from Ukraine.来自乌克兰的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2022 Jun 22;20(6):e07391. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7391. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
Commodity risk assessment of potted plants from Turkey.来自土耳其的盆栽植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2022 Jun 30;20(6):e07392. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7392. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
Commodity risk assessment of unrooted cuttings from .来自……的无根插条的商品风险评估
EFSA J. 2022 May 3;20(5):e07300. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7300. eCollection 2022 May.

引用本文的文献

1
Pest categorisation of .……的有害生物分类
EFSA J. 2025 Jun 26;23(6):e9495. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9495. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Commodity risk assessment of plants from United Kingdom.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 3;22(7):e8836. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8836. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Guidance on commodity risk assessment for the evaluation of high risk plants dossiers.用于评估高风险植物档案的商品风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2019 Apr 29;17(4):e05668. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5668. eCollection 2019 Apr.
3
Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment.有害生物定量风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Aug 3;16(8):e05350. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5350. eCollection 2018 Aug.
4
The principles and methods behind EFSA's Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessment.欧洲食品安全局科学评估中不确定性分析指南背后的原则和方法。
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 24;16(1):e05122. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5122. eCollection 2018 Jan.