• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自乌克兰的植物的商品风险评估。

Commodity risk assessment of plants from Ukraine.

作者信息

Bragard Claude, Chatzivassiliou Elisavet, Dehnen-Schmutz Katharina, Baptista Paula, Gonthier Paolo, Jacques Marie-Agnès, Jaques Miret Josep Anton, Justesen Annemarie Fejer, MacLeod Alan, Magnusson Christer Sven, Milonas Panagiotis, Navas-Cortes Juan A, Parnell Stephen, Potting Roel, Reignault Philippe L, Stefani Emilio, Thulke Hans-Hermann, Van der Werf Wopke, Vicent Antonio, Zappalà Lucia, Lucchi Andrea, Gómez Pedro, Urek Gregor, Bernardo Umberto, Bubici Giovanni, Carluccio Anna Vittoria, Chiumenti Michela, Di Serio Francesco, Fanelli Elena, Marzachì Cristina, Gardi Ciro, Mosbach-Schulz Olaf, de la Peña Eduardo, Yuen Jonathan

出版信息

EFSA J. 2022 Jun 22;20(6):e07391. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7391. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7391
PMID:35774585
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9214634/
Abstract

The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as 'High risk plants, plant products and other objects'. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by plants of grafted on imported from Ukraine, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by Ukraine. All pests associated with the commodity were evaluated against specific criteria for their relevance for this opinion. One quarantine pest (), two protected zone quarantine pests ( and pv. ) and one non-regulated pest () that fulfilled all relevant criteria were selected for further evaluation. For these four pests, the risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical dossier from Ukraine were evaluated taking into account the possible limiting factors. For the selected pests, an expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The degree of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with pv. being the pest most frequently expected on the imported plants. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated with 95% certainty that between 9,870 and 10,000 bundles (consisting of 10 plants each) per 10,000 would be free from pv. .

摘要

欧盟委员会要求欧洲食品安全局植物健康小组对欧盟委员会实施条例(EU)2018/2019中列为“高风险植物、植物产品及其他物品”的商品进行风险评估并提交结果。本科学意见涵盖了从乌克兰进口的嫁接于 上的植物所带来的植物健康风险,同时考虑了现有科学信息,包括乌克兰提供的技术信息。针对该商品相关的所有有害生物,根据与本意见相关性的特定标准进行了评估。挑选出一种检疫性有害生物()、两种保护区检疫性有害生物( 和 致病型 )以及一种符合所有相关标准的非管制性有害生物()进行进一步评估。对于这四种有害生物,考虑到可能的限制因素,对乌克兰技术档案中提出的风险缓解措施进行了评估。对于选定的有害生物,在考虑针对有害生物的风险缓解措施(包括评估中存在的不确定性)的情况下,就有害生物不存在的可能性给出了专家判断。在评估的有害生物中,有害生物不存在的程度各不相同,致病型 是进口植物上最常预期出现的有害生物。专家知识 elicitation 以95%的确定性表明,每10000株中,9870至10000捆(每捆由10株植物组成)将不存在致病型 。

注

原文中部分拉丁学名等内容未完整给出,翻译可能存在一定局限性,且“Expert Knowledge Elicitation”这里的“elicitation”可能是特定专业术语,暂直译为“引出”,不太明确具体准确含义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/889b9c23b132/EFS2-20-e07391-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/68019f32aa8c/EFS2-20-e07391-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/2d26d9f633b5/EFS2-20-e07391-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/a13bccc2cdb8/EFS2-20-e07391-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/6d890d7849a1/EFS2-20-e07391-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/2712989bc67b/EFS2-20-e07391-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/a64d45ae3e97/EFS2-20-e07391-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/203d833071c1/EFS2-20-e07391-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/c7f381185811/EFS2-20-e07391-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/258d238e93fa/EFS2-20-e07391-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/889b9c23b132/EFS2-20-e07391-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/68019f32aa8c/EFS2-20-e07391-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/2d26d9f633b5/EFS2-20-e07391-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/a13bccc2cdb8/EFS2-20-e07391-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/6d890d7849a1/EFS2-20-e07391-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/2712989bc67b/EFS2-20-e07391-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/a64d45ae3e97/EFS2-20-e07391-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/203d833071c1/EFS2-20-e07391-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/c7f381185811/EFS2-20-e07391-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/258d238e93fa/EFS2-20-e07391-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e32/9214634/889b9c23b132/EFS2-20-e07391-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Commodity risk assessment of plants from Ukraine.来自乌克兰的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2022 Jun 22;20(6):e07391. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7391. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Commodity risk assessment of plants from Ukraine.乌克兰植物的商品风险评估
EFSA J. 2021 Nov 11;19(11):e06909. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6909. eCollection 2021 Nov.
3
Commodity risk assessment of plants of 12 selected species from Moldova.来自摩尔多瓦的12种选定植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2024 Mar 12;22(3):e8647. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8647. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Commodity risk assessment of plants from Turkey.来自土耳其的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2022 May 5;20(5):e07301. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7301. eCollection 2022 May.
5
Commodity risk assessment of plants from United Kingdom.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2023 May 12;21(5):e08002. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8002. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Commodity risk assessment of plants from United Kingdom.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Jun 19;21(6):e08076. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8076. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Commodity risk assessment of plants from United Kingdom.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 24;22(7):e8893. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8893. eCollection 2024 Jul.
8
Commodity risk assessment of plants from United Kingdom.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 3;22(7):e8836. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8836. eCollection 2024 Jul.
9
Commodity risk assessment of specified species of potted plants from .来自……的特定种类盆栽植物的商品风险评估
EFSA J. 2022 Jan 18;20(1):e07014. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7014. eCollection 2022 Jan.
10
Commodity risk assessment of plants from .来自……的植物的商品风险评估
EFSA J. 2021 May 4;19(5):e06568. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6568. eCollection 2021 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Commodity risk assessment of black pine ( Parl.) bonsai from Japan.来自日本的黑松(Parl.)盆景的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2019 May 15;17(5):e05667. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5667. eCollection 2019 May.
2
Guidance on commodity risk assessment for the evaluation of high risk plants dossiers.用于评估高风险植物档案的商品风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2019 Apr 29;17(4):e05668. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5668. eCollection 2019 Apr.
3
Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment.有害生物定量风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Aug 3;16(8):e05350. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5350. eCollection 2018 Aug.
4
The principles and methods behind EFSA's Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessment.欧洲食品安全局科学评估中不确定性分析指南背后的原则和方法。
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 24;16(1):e05122. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5122. eCollection 2018 Jan.