• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。

Commodity risk assessment of plants from United Kingdom.

作者信息

Bragard Claude, Baptista Paula, Chatzivassiliou Elisavet, Gonthier Paolo, Jaques Miret Josep Anton, Justesen Annemarie Fejer, MacLeod Alan, Magnusson Christer Sven, Milonas Panagiotis, Navas-Cortes Juan A, Parnell Stephen, Potting Roel, Reignault Philippe Lucien, Stefani Emilio, Thulke Hans-Hermann, Van der Werf Wopke, Civera Antonio Vicent, Zappalà Lucia, Lucchi Andrea, Gómez Pedro, Urek Gregor, Bernardo Umberto, Bubici Giovanni, Carluccio Anna Vittoria, Chiumenti Michela, Di Serio Francesco, Fanelli Elena, Marzachì Cristina, Kaczmarek Agata, Mosbach-Schulz Olaf, Yuen Jonathan

出版信息

EFSA J. 2023 May 12;21(5):e08002. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8002. eCollection 2023 May.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8002
PMID:37187571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10176602/
Abstract

The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as 'High risk plants, plant products and other objects'. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by rooted plants in pots, bundles of bare-rooted plants or trees and bundles of budwood and graftwood of imported from the United Kingdom, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by the United Kingdom. All pests associated with the commodities were evaluated against specific criteria for their relevance for this opinion. Two quarantine pests (tobacco ringspot virus and tomato ringspot virus), one protected zone quarantine pest () and four non-regulated pests () that fulfilled all relevant criteria were selected for further evaluation. For , special requirements are specified in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072. Based on the information provided in the Dossier, the specific requirements for were met. For the remaining six pests, the risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical Dossier from the UK were evaluated considering the possible limiting factors. For the selected pests, expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom, taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The degree of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with scales ( and ) being the pests most frequently expected on the imported budwood and graftwood. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated with 95% certainty that between 9,976 and 10,000 bundles (consisting of 50 up to 500 plants each) per 10,000 would be free from the above-mentioned scales.

摘要

欧盟委员会要求欧洲食品安全局植物健康小组针对欧盟委员会实施条例(EU)2018/2019中列为“高风险植物、植物产品及其他物品”的商品进行风险评估并提交报告。本科学意见涵盖了从英国进口的盆栽生根植物、裸根植物或树木束以及接穗和嫁接木束所带来的植物健康风险,同时考虑了现有科学信息,包括英国提供的技术信息。针对与这些商品相关的所有有害生物,依据与本意见相关性的特定标准进行了评估。选择了两种检疫性有害生物(烟草环斑病毒和番茄环斑病毒)、一种保护区检疫性有害生物()以及四种符合所有相关标准的非管制性有害生物()进行进一步评估。对于,欧盟委员会实施条例(EU)2019/2072规定了特殊要求。根据卷宗中提供的信息,满足了的特定要求。对于其余六种有害生物,考虑到可能的限制因素,对英国技术卷宗中提出的风险缓解措施进行了评估。对于选定的有害生物,在考虑作用于有害生物的风险缓解措施(包括评估中存在的不确定性)的基础上,就有害生物不存在的可能性给出了专家判断。在所评估的有害生物中,有害生物不存在的程度各不相同,其中蚧壳虫(和)是预计在进口接穗和嫁接木上最常出现的有害生物。专家知识 elicitation 表明,有 95%的确定性,每 10000 个中,9976 至 10000 束(每束由 50 至 500 株植物组成)将不存在上述蚧壳虫。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a966/10176602/cdee3e2e251e/EFS2-21-e08002-g024.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a966/10176602/6926f119c076/EFS2-21-e08002-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a966/10176602/b355d12b3d81/EFS2-21-e08002-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a966/10176602/c6405212d27e/EFS2-21-e08002-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a966/10176602/63b4c172f896/EFS2-21-e08002-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a966/10176602/cdee3e2e251e/EFS2-21-e08002-g024.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a966/10176602/6926f119c076/EFS2-21-e08002-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a966/10176602/b355d12b3d81/EFS2-21-e08002-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a966/10176602/c6405212d27e/EFS2-21-e08002-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a966/10176602/63b4c172f896/EFS2-21-e08002-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a966/10176602/cdee3e2e251e/EFS2-21-e08002-g024.jpg

相似文献

1
Commodity risk assessment of plants from United Kingdom.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2023 May 12;21(5):e08002. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8002. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Commodity risk assessment of plants from United Kingdom.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Jun 19;21(6):e08076. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8076. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Commodity risk assessment of plants from Turkey.来自土耳其的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2022 May 5;20(5):e07301. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7301. eCollection 2022 May.
4
Commodity risk assessment of plants from Ukraine.乌克兰植物的商品风险评估
EFSA J. 2021 Nov 11;19(11):e06909. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6909. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Commodity risk assessment of plants from United Kingdom.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 3;22(7):e8836. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8836. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Commodity risk assessment of plants from United Kingdom.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 24;22(7):e8893. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8893. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Commodity risk assessment of plants from Ukraine.来自乌克兰的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2022 Jun 22;20(6):e07391. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7391. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Commodity risk assessment of plants from Serbia.塞尔维亚植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2020 May 13;18(5):e06109. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6109. eCollection 2020 May.
9
Commodity risk assessment of plants from the UK.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Jul 6;21(7):e08073. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8073. eCollection 2023 Jul.
10
Commodity risk assessment of plants from the UK.英国植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Jul 6;21(7):e08074. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8074. eCollection 2023 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Pest categorisation of .……的有害生物分类
EFSA J. 2025 Jun 26;23(6):e9495. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9495. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidance on commodity risk assessment for the evaluation of high risk plants dossiers.用于评估高风险植物档案的商品风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2019 Apr 29;17(4):e05668. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5668. eCollection 2019 Apr.
2
Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment.有害生物定量风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Aug 3;16(8):e05350. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5350. eCollection 2018 Aug.
3
The principles and methods behind EFSA's Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessment.欧洲食品安全局科学评估中不确定性分析指南背后的原则和方法。
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 24;16(1):e05122. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5122. eCollection 2018 Jan.
4
Molecular Diversity of Anthracnose Pathogen Populations Associated with UK Strawberry Production Suggests Multiple Introductions of Three Different Colletotrichum Species.与英国草莓生产相关的炭疽病菌种群的分子多样性表明三种不同炭疽菌属物种多次传入。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 18;10(6):e0129140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129140. eCollection 2015.
5
On the species status of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne ulmi Palmisano & Ambrogioni, 2000 (Nematoda, Meloidogynidae).关于根结线虫榆根结线虫帕尔米萨诺和安布罗焦尼,2000年(线虫纲,根结线虫科)的物种地位。
Zookeys. 2013 Dec 13(362):1-27. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.362.6352. eCollection 2013.