• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在基层医疗中的混合试验中开发和应用定性快速分析框架。

Development and application of a qualitative rapid analysis framework in a hybrid trial within primary care.

机构信息

Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Division of Population Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Division of Population Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 24;14(7):e076792. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076792.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076792
PMID:39053958
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11284935/
Abstract

CONTEXT

In the context of iterative feedback loops to support real-time policy decision making, and an emphasis on speeding up adoption of evidence-based interventions, qualitative healthcare researchers are increasingly expected to produce rapid results and products. Traditional qualitative methods have been adapted for this purpose.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and apply a rapid analysis framework in a process evaluation for the VICTORION-Spirit study; a ground-breaking hybrid trial examining real-world delivery of inclisiran-a cholesterol-lowering treatment-in primary care.

DESIGN

We developed a rapid analysis framework, using a summary template, to analyse data from semistructured telephone interviews.

SETTING

Primary care in Greater Manchester, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who had received inclisiran as part of the VICTORION-Spirit trial (56), providers delivering inclisiran (28) and representatives from the Academic Health Science Network (8) participated in the original study.

RESULTS

The rapid analysis framework we developed and applied comprised six steps: (1) creating a summary template based on the five Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains; (2) test-driving, refining and finalising the summary template; (3) completing the template soon after each interview using field notes; (4) discussing analysis as a team; (5) transferring summaries to a matrix; and (6) using the summary matrix to inform presentations and interim reports for stakeholders. Our rapid analysis framework saved time and improved efficiency, as we were able to feedback barriers to stakeholders in real time via presentations.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid analysis in applied healthcare research can produce timely and trustworthy findings. Our rapid analysis framework would be useful within studies where there is a need to feedback to stakeholders and adjust implementation strategies accordingly in real time. Thus, supporting successful implementation efforts and accelerating adoption.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04807400, 19/03/2021.

摘要

背景

在支持实时政策决策的迭代反馈循环中,并且强调加快采用基于证据的干预措施,医学研究人员越来越需要提供快速的结果和产品。为此,传统的定性方法已经过调整以适应此目的。

目的

在 VICTORION-Spirit 研究的过程评估中开发和应用快速分析框架;这是一项开创性的混合试验,研究了在初级保健中实际提供inclisiran(一种降低胆固醇的治疗方法)。

设计

我们开发了一个快速分析框架,使用摘要模板来分析半结构化电话访谈的数据。

设置

英国大曼彻斯特的初级保健。

参与者

参加 VICTORION-Spirit 试验的患者(56 名)、提供 inclisiran 的提供者(28 名)和学术健康科学网络的代表(8 名)参加了原始研究。

结果

我们开发并应用的快速分析框架包括六个步骤:(1)根据五个实施研究综合框架领域创建摘要模板;(2)试用、改进和最终确定摘要模板;(3)使用现场笔记在每次访谈后尽快完成模板;(4)团队讨论分析;(5)将摘要转移到矩阵中;(6)使用摘要矩阵为利益相关者提供信息。我们的快速分析框架节省了时间并提高了效率,因为我们能够通过演示实时向利益相关者反馈障碍。

结论

在应用医疗保健研究中,快速分析可以产生及时且值得信赖的结果。我们的快速分析框架在需要及时向利益相关者反馈并相应地实时调整实施策略的研究中非常有用。从而支持成功的实施工作并加速采用。

试验注册号

NCT04807400,2021 年 3 月 19 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d18a/11284935/ef1c0aa5f3c4/bmjopen-14-7-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d18a/11284935/d462f1f3e700/bmjopen-14-7-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d18a/11284935/ef1c0aa5f3c4/bmjopen-14-7-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d18a/11284935/d462f1f3e700/bmjopen-14-7-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d18a/11284935/ef1c0aa5f3c4/bmjopen-14-7-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and application of a qualitative rapid analysis framework in a hybrid trial within primary care.在基层医疗中的混合试验中开发和应用定性快速分析框架。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 24;14(7):e076792. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076792.
2
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
3
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
6
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation.腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术对女性和医护人员的可行性、可接受性及适宜性:LAVA试验定性过程评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 23:1-21. doi: 10.3310/GJTC1325.
9
Ambulatory Oxygen for Pulmonary Fibrosis (OxyPuF): a randomised controlled trial and acceptability study.用于肺纤维化的门诊氧疗(OxyPuF):一项随机对照试验和可接受性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 2:1-33. doi: 10.3310/TWKS4194.
10
Preparing to implement Floreciendo with Latina teens and their female caregivers: Integrating implementation science and the multiphase optimization strategy framework.准备与拉丁裔青少年及其女性照顾者一起实施“Floreciendo”:整合实施科学与多阶段优化策略框架。
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf005.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a notes-based rapid qualitative analysis method to facilitate implementation.评估一种基于笔记的快速定性分析方法以促进实施。
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Mar 3;6(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00709-w.
2
Evaluating the implementation of inclisiran in primary care: process evaluation interim findings from interviews with key stakeholders.评估inclisiran在初级保健中的实施情况:对关键利益相关者访谈的过程评估中期结果
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 26;15(2):e083441. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083441.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).使用实施研究整合框架(CFIR)进行快速与传统定性分析。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jul 2;16(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01111-5.
2
Carrying Out Rapid Qualitative Research During a Pandemic: Emerging Lessons From COVID-19.在大流行期间开展快速定性研究:COVID-19 带来的新经验。
Qual Health Res. 2020 Dec;30(14):2192-2204. doi: 10.1177/1049732320951526. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
3
Rapid Techniques in Qualitative Research: A Critical Review of the Literature.
快速定性研究技术:文献综述的批判性评价。
Qual Health Res. 2020 Aug;30(10):1596-1604. doi: 10.1177/1049732320921835.
4
Comparison of rapid vs in-depth qualitative analytic methods from a process evaluation of academic detailing in the Veterans Health Administration.从退伍军人健康管理局的学术细化过程评估比较快速与深入的定性分析方法。
Implement Sci. 2019 Feb 1;14(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0853-y.
5
Can rapid approaches to qualitative analysis deliver timely, valid findings to clinical leaders? A mixed methods study comparing rapid and thematic analysis.快速定性分析方法能否为临床领导者提供及时、有效的发现?一项比较快速分析和主题分析的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 8;8(10):e019993. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019993.
6
Quick and dirty? A systematic review of the use of rapid ethnographies in healthcare organisation and delivery.快速而粗略?快速民族志在医疗保健组织和提供中的应用的系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Apr;27(4):321-330. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007226. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
7
Hearing voices: Comparing two methods for analysis of focus group data.幻听:比较焦点小组数据分析的两种方法。
Appl Nurs Res. 2017 Jun;35:90-93. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
8
Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: a rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation.运用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)得出可付诸行动的结果:一种用于改进实施的快速循环评估方法。
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 10;12(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0550-7.
9
Developing robust, sustainable, implementation systems using rigorous, rapid and relevant science.开发强大、可持续的实施系统,采用严谨、快速和相关的科学。
Clin Transl Sci. 2012 Feb;5(1):48-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00383.x. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
10
Rapid assessment of clinical information systems in the healthcare setting: an efficient method for time-pressed evaluation.医疗机构中临床信息系统的快速评估:一种适用于时间紧迫情况下评估的有效方法。
Methods Inf Med. 2011;50(4):299-307. doi: 10.3414/ME10-01-0042. Epub 2010 Dec 20.