Nisar Muhammad Junaid, Gogi Muhammad Dildar, Abbasi Asim, Atta Bilal, Yousafi Qudsia, Ul Haq Inzamam, Subhan Mishal, Ali Hayssam M, Alsakkaf Waleed A A, Basiouny Mohamed S
Integrated Pest Management Laboratory, Department of Entomology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan.
Department of Entomology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan.
Insects. 2024 Jun 24;15(7):470. doi: 10.3390/insects15070470.
Laboratory and field assays of three sets of experiments were conducted to evaluate the impact of different phagostimulants alone and in combination with other phagostimulant lure sources, such as ammonium acetate, DAP, and acetic acid, on the attractancy of both sexes of . In the first experiment, the laboratory olfactometer study revealed that out of eleven phagostimulants, banana, mulberry, mango, guava, molasses, and protein hydrolysate exhibited moderate attractancy (15.2-60.2%) to . Unexpectedly, banana and protein hydrolysate were demonstrated to be highly attractive phagostimulants for starved female (53.6% and 60.2%, respectively). In the field study, none of the tested phagostimulants exhibited high attractancy; however, banana, mulberry, protein hydrolysate, guava, mango, and molasses demonstrated moderate attractancy (5.6-35.6%) to . In the second experiment, out of five phagostimulant-mixtures, phagostimulant-mixture-4 proved highly attractive (40.5-68.6% and 45.5-51.2%), followed by phagostimulant-mixture-3, which proved to be moderately attractive (17.0-22.5% and 28.4-36.1%) to in olfactometer and field studies, respectively. In the third experiment, out of five phagostimulant-AdMixtures, phagostimulant-AdMixture-4 demonstrated strong attractiveness in the olfactometer (41.6-68.7%) and field studies (52.7-58.7%) for , while the rest of the AdMixtures demonstrated moderate to no attractiveness for . So, phagostimulant-AdMixture-4 with GF-120 could be used in the development of a phagostimulant bait station which attracts the maximum population and ultimately provides pest-free fruits to the farmers.
进行了三组实验的实验室和田间测定,以评估不同的取食刺激剂单独使用以及与其他取食刺激剂诱捕源(如醋酸铵、二氨基嘌呤和醋酸)联合使用时,对[目标物种]两性的引诱力。在第一个实验中,实验室嗅觉测定研究表明,在11种取食刺激剂中,香蕉、桑椹、芒果、番石榴、糖蜜和蛋白水解物对[目标物种]表现出中等引诱力(15.2 - 60.2%)。出乎意料的是,香蕉和蛋白水解物被证明是饥饿雌性[目标物种]的高吸引力取食刺激剂(分别为53.6%和60.2%)。在田间研究中,所测试的取食刺激剂均未表现出高引诱力;然而,香蕉、桑椹、蛋白水解物、番石榴、芒果和糖蜜对[目标物种]表现出中等引诱力(5.6 - 35.6%)。在第二个实验中,在五种取食刺激剂混合物中,取食刺激剂混合物 - 4被证明具有高吸引力(40.5 - 68.6%和45.5 - 51.2%),其次是取食刺激剂混合物 - 3,在嗅觉测定和田间研究中分别被证明具有中等吸引力(17.0 - 22.5%和28.4 - 36.1%)。在第三个实验中,在五种取食刺激剂 - 增效剂混合物中,取食刺激剂 - 增效剂混合物 - 4在嗅觉测定(41.6 - 68.7%)和田间研究(52.7 - 58.7%)中对[目标物种]表现出强烈吸引力,而其余的增效剂混合物对[目标物种]表现出中等至无吸引力。因此,含GF - 120的取食刺激剂 - 增效剂混合物 - 4可用于开发一种取食刺激剂诱饵站,该诱饵站能吸引最多的[目标物种]种群,并最终为农民提供无虫害的水果。