Averill Anne L, Eitzer Brian D, Drummond Francis A
Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Department of Analytical Chemistry, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Insects. 2024 Jun 29;15(7):489. doi: 10.3390/insects15070489.
A pesticide exposure baseline for honey bees was compiled for two New England cropping systems, the native North American plant species consisting of lowbush blueberry ( Aiton) and cranberry ( Aiton). More unique pesticide compounds were applied in blueberry than cranberry, but the numbers of pesticides discovered in trapped honey bee pollen were similar between the two crop systems. Not all pesticides found in pollen were the result of the applications reported by growers of either crop. When comparing residues, number of pesticides detected, total concentration, and risk quotient varied between the two crops. Also, blueberry was dominated by fungicides and miticides (varroacides) and cranberry was dominated by insecticides and herbicides. When comparing reported grower applications that were matched with detection in residues, the proportion of pesticide numbers, concentrations, and risk quotients varied by crop system and pesticide class. In most cases, pesticide residue concentrations were of low risk (low risk quotient) to honey bees in these crops. Estimation of decay rates of some of the most common pesticide residues under field conditions could aid growers in selection of less persistent compounds, together with safe application dates, prior to bringing in honey bees for pollination.
为新英格兰的两种种植系统编制了蜜蜂农药暴露基线,这两种种植系统是由北美本土植物物种组成的,即矮丛蓝莓(艾顿)和蔓越莓(艾顿)。蓝莓种植中施用的独特农药化合物比蔓越莓多,但在诱捕的蜜蜂花粉中发现的农药数量在这两种作物系统中相似。并非花粉中发现的所有农药都是两种作物种植者报告的施药结果。在比较残留量、检测到的农药数量、总浓度和风险商时,两种作物之间存在差异。此外,蓝莓种植中杀菌剂和杀螨剂(杀螨剂)占主导,蔓越莓种植中杀虫剂和除草剂占主导。在比较与残留检测相匹配的种植者报告施药情况时,农药数量、浓度和风险商的比例因作物系统和农药类别而异。在大多数情况下,这些作物中的农药残留浓度对蜜蜂的风险较低(风险商较低)。估算田间条件下一些最常见农药残留的衰减率,有助于种植者选择持久性较低的化合物,并在引入蜜蜂进行授粉之前确定安全施药日期。