Suppr超能文献

评价水烟使用者与香烟使用者的牙周临床影像学状况和全唾液前列腺素 E2 水平。

Evaluation of Periodontal Clinicoradiographic Status and Whol Salivary Prostaglandin E2 Levels among Users of Water Pipe and Cigarettes.

出版信息

Oral Health Prev Dent. 2024 Jul 26;22:341-348. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b5629079.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective was to evaluate the periodontal clinicoradiographic status and whole salivary prostaglandin E2 (PgE2) levels among users of water pipe and cigarettes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Demographic data, duration of smoking (pack years), and familial history of smoking were recorded using a questionnaire. Participants were allocated into three groups based on their smoking status: group 1: self-reported cigarette smokers (CS); group 2: self-reported water-pipe-users; and group 3: non-smokers. The assessment included measurements of full-mouth plaque and gingival indices (PI and GI), as well as probing depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), and marginal bone loss (MBL). Unstimulated whole saliva samples were collected and PgE2 levels were measured. Group comparisons were done and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Thirty-three, 34 and 33 individuals were included in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Full mouth PI (p<0.05), GI (p<0.05), PD (p<0.05) and mesial (p<0.05) and distal (p<0.05) MBL were statistically significantly higher among patients in groups 1 and 2 than group 3. The scores of CAL in groups 1 and 2 were 3.45 ± 0.97 and 3.62 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. None of the individuals in the control group displayed CAL. PgE2 levels were statistically significantly higher among patients in groups 1 (231.5 ± 66.3 pg/ml) (p<0.05) and 2 (231.5 ± 66.3 pg/ml) (p<0.05) compared with group 3 (76.6 ± 10.6 pg/ml). In groups 1 and 2, a statistically significant relationship was observed between pack-years, the duration of water-pipe smoking, and the levels of PgE2 and PD.

CONCLUSION

There is no difference in periodontal clinicoradiographic status and whole salivary PgE2 levels between CS and waterpipe-users; however, these parameters are worse in CS and water-pipe users than in non-smokers.

摘要

目的

评估水烟和香烟使用者的牙周临床放射状况和全唾液前列腺素 E2(PgE2)水平。

材料和方法

使用问卷记录人口统计学数据、吸烟(包年)时间和家族吸烟史。根据吸烟状况将参与者分为三组:组 1:自我报告的香烟吸烟者(CS);组 2:自我报告的水烟使用者;组 3:不吸烟者。评估包括全口菌斑和牙龈指数(PI 和 GI)、探诊深度(PD)、临床附着丧失(CAL)和边缘骨丧失(MBL)的测量。收集未刺激的全唾液样本并测量 PgE2 水平。进行组间比较,p<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

分别有 33、34 和 33 人纳入组 1、2 和 3。组 1 和 2 的全口 PI(p<0.05)、GI(p<0.05)、PD(p<0.05)和近中(p<0.05)和远中(p<0.05)MBL 均明显高于组 3。组 1 和 2 的 CAL 评分分别为 3.45 ± 0.97 和 3.62 ± 1.2 mm,对照组中没有 CAL。组 1(231.5 ± 66.3 pg/ml)(p<0.05)和组 2(231.5 ± 66.3 pg/ml)(p<0.05)的患者 PgE2 水平明显高于组 3(76.6 ± 10.6 pg/ml)。在组 1 和 2 中,PG 水平与包年、水烟吸烟时间以及 PD 之间存在统计学显著关系。

结论

CS 和水烟使用者的牙周临床放射状况和全唾液 PgE2 水平无差异,但 CS 和水烟使用者的这些参数比非吸烟者差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f711/11619820/08e13194e394/ohpd-22-341-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验