• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cost and Effectiveness of Reminders to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Rural Federally Qualified Health Centers in West Virginia.西弗吉尼亚州农村联邦合格健康中心促进结直肠癌筛查的提醒措施的成本与效果
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):891-897. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954164. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
Effectiveness and cost of multilayered colorectal cancer screening promotion interventions at federally qualified health centers in Washington State.华盛顿州联邦合格健康中心实施的多层结直肠癌筛查推广干预措施的效果和成本。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 1;124(21):4121-4129. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31693. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
3
Effect of Reminding Patients to Complete Fecal Immunochemical Testing: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Automated and Live Approaches.提醒患者完成粪便免疫化学检测的效果:自动化与人工两种方式的比较效果研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jan;33(1):72-78. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4184-x. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
4
The Effectiveness and Cost to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Federally Qualified Homeless Clinic in Eastern Kentucky.在肯塔基州东部一家符合联邦资格的无家可归者诊所提高结直肠癌筛查的有效性和成本
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):905-909. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954165. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
5
Improving Fecal Immunochemical Test Return Rates: A Colorectal Cancer Screening Quality Improvement Project in a Multisite Federally Qualified Health Center.提高粪便免疫化学检测(Fecal Immunochemical Test,FIT)的回检率:在一个多地点联邦合格健康中心开展的结直肠癌筛查质量改进项目。
Health Promot Pract. 2023 Jul;24(4):740-754. doi: 10.1177/15248399221083294. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
6
Barriers and Facilitators of Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC).联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)中结直肠癌筛查的障碍与促进因素
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Mar-Apr;32(2):180-190. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.02.180205.
7
Automated Reminders Enhance Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test Completion Among Veterans: a Randomized Controlled Trial.自动化提醒可提高退伍军人邮寄粪便免疫化学检测的完成率:一项随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Jan;39(1):113-119. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08409-8. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
8
Centralized Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.在联邦合格健康中心开展集中结直肠癌筛查外展活动:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2446693. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46693.
9
Effectiveness and Acceptability of Targeted Text Message Reminders in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Randomized Controlled Trial (M-TICS Study).靶向短信提醒在结直肠癌筛查中的有效性和可接受性:随机对照试验(M-TICS 研究)。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jul 31;10:e57959. doi: 10.2196/57959.
10
Implementing an enhanced mailed FIT program to improve CRC screening at a federally qualified health center: experiences of patients and staff.实施强化邮寄粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)计划以改善一家联邦合格健康中心的结直肠癌筛查:患者和工作人员的经验。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Sep 28;13(10):757-767. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad025.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Rural Settings: A Scoping Review.提高农村地区结直肠癌筛查参与率的干预措施:一项范围综述
Prev Chronic Dis. 2025 Jul 17;22:E44. doi: 10.5888/pcd22.250025.
2
Examining the Sustainability of Core Capacity and Evidence-Based Interventions for FIT-Based CRC Screening: California Colorectal Cancer Control Program.基于 FIT 的 CRC 筛查的核心能力和循证干预措施的可持续性研究:加利福尼亚州结直肠癌控制计划。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241255218. doi: 10.1177/10732748241255218.
3
Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma methylation markers in salivary DNA.检测唾液 DNA 中的肝癌甲基化标记物。
Biosci Rep. 2024 Mar 29;44(3). doi: 10.1042/BSR20232063.
4
Implementing an enhanced mailed FIT program to improve CRC screening at a federally qualified health center: experiences of patients and staff.实施强化邮寄粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)计划以改善一家联邦合格健康中心的结直肠癌筛查:患者和工作人员的经验。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Sep 28;13(10):757-767. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad025.
5
How to Perform Economic Evaluation in Implementation Studies: Imaging-Specific Considerations and Comparison of Financial Models.如何在实施研究中进行经济评价:成像特定考虑因素和财务模型比较。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2023 Mar;20(3):292-298. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.11.018.
6
Integrated interventions and supporting activities to increase uptake of multiple cancer screenings: conceptual framework, determinants of implementation success, measurement challenges, and research priorities.增加多种癌症筛查接受度的综合干预措施及支持活动:概念框架、实施成功的决定因素、测量挑战及研究重点
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Oct 5;3(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00353-8.
7
The Effectiveness and Cost to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Federally Qualified Homeless Clinic in Eastern Kentucky.在肯塔基州东部一家符合联邦资格的无家可归者诊所提高结直肠癌筛查的有效性和成本
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):905-909. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954165. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
8
Examining the Effectiveness of Provider Incentives to Increase CRC Screening Uptake in Neighborhood Healthcare: A California Federally Qualified Health Center.考察医疗服务提供者激励措施在社区医疗中提高结直肠癌筛查接受率的有效性:以加利福尼亚州一家联邦合格健康中心为例
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):898-904. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954166. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
9
Economic Evaluation of Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening at Federally Qualified Health Centers.联邦合格医疗中心增加结直肠癌筛查干预措施的经济评估
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):877-883. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954168. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Economic Evaluation of Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening at Federally Qualified Health Centers.联邦合格医疗中心增加结直肠癌筛查干预措施的经济评估
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):877-883. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954168. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
Costs of colorectal cancer screening provision in CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program: Comparisons of colonoscopy and FOBT/FIT based screening.美国疾病控制与预防中心结直肠癌控制项目中结直肠癌筛查的成本:结肠镜检查与基于粪便潜血试验/粪便免疫化学试验筛查的比较
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Jun;62:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
3
Outreach for Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Budget Impact Analysis for Community Health Centers.年度结直肠癌筛查的推广:社区卫生中心的预算影响分析
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Feb;50(2):e54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
4
Where can colorectal cancer screening interventions have the most impact?结直肠癌筛查干预措施在哪些方面能产生最大影响?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Aug;24(8):1151-6. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0082. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
5
Increasing colorectal cancer screening in an overdue population: participation and cost impacts of adding telephone calls to a FIT mailing program.在一个逾期未进行的人群中增加结直肠癌筛查:在 FIT 邮寄计划中添加电话随访对参与率和成本的影响。
J Community Health. 2014 Apr;39(2):239-47. doi: 10.1007/s10900-014-9830-1.
6
Economies of scale in federally-funded state-organized public health programs: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Programs.联邦资助的州组织公共卫生计划中的规模经济:国家乳腺癌和宫颈癌早期检测计划的结果。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2014 Dec;17(4):321-30. doi: 10.1007/s10729-013-9261-z. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
7
Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services.干预措施提高乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查率的效果:《社区预防服务指南》的 9 项更新系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jul;43(1):97-118. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.009.
8
Updated recommendations for client- and provider-oriented interventions to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.更新后的建议,针对以客户和提供者为导向的干预措施,以增加乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌的筛查。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jul;43(1):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.008.
9
Perceptions of colon cancer screening by stage of screening test adoption.根据筛查测试采用阶段对结肠癌筛查的认知
Cancer Nurs. 2007 May-Jun;30(3):178-85. doi: 10.1097/01.NCC.0000270706.80037.05.

西弗吉尼亚州农村联邦合格健康中心促进结直肠癌筛查的提醒措施的成本与效果

Cost and Effectiveness of Reminders to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Rural Federally Qualified Health Centers in West Virginia.

作者信息

Conn Mary Ellen, Kennedy-Rea Stephenie, Subramanian Sujha, Baus Adam, Hoover Sonja, Cunningham Cheryl, Tangka Florence K L

机构信息

West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.

RTI International, Waltham, MA, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):891-897. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954164. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1177/1524839920954164
PMID:32990048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7894066/
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the West Virginia Program to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in implementing patient reminders to increase fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kit return rates in nine federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). Using process measures and cost data collected, the authors examined the differences in the intensity of the phone calls across FQHCs and compared them with the return rates achieved. They also reported the cost per kit successfully returned as a result of the intervention. Across all FQHCs, 5,041 FIT kits were ordered, and the initial return rate (without a reminder) was 41.1%. A total of 2,201 patients received reminder phone calls; on average, patients received 1.61 reminder calls each. The reminder interventions increased the average FIT kit return rate to 60.7%. The average total cost per FIT kit returned across all FQHCs was $60.18, and the average cost of only the reminders was $11.20 per FIT kit returned. FQHCs achieved an average increase of 19.6 percentage points in FIT kit return rates, and costs across clinics varied. Clinics with high-quality health information systems that enabled tracking of patients with minimal effort were able to implement lower cost reminder interventions.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估西弗吉尼亚州提高结直肠癌筛查项目在九个联邦合格健康中心(FQHCs)实施患者提醒以提高粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)试剂盒回收率方面的有效性。利用收集到的过程指标和成本数据,作者研究了各FQHCs电话提醒强度的差异,并将其与实现的回收率进行比较。他们还报告了因干预措施成功回收每个试剂盒的成本。在所有FQHCs中,共订购了5041个FIT试剂盒,初始回收率(无提醒)为41.1%。共有2201名患者接到提醒电话;患者平均每人接到1.61次提醒电话。提醒干预措施使FIT试剂盒的平均回收率提高到60.7%。所有FQHCs回收每个FIT试剂盒的平均总成本为60.18美元,仅提醒部分的平均成本为每个回收试剂盒11.20美元。FQHCs的FIT试剂盒回收率平均提高了19.6个百分点,各诊所的成本有所不同。拥有高质量健康信息系统、能够轻松跟踪患者的诊所能够实施成本较低的提醒干预措施。