• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Examining the Effectiveness of Provider Incentives to Increase CRC Screening Uptake in Neighborhood Healthcare: A California Federally Qualified Health Center.考察医疗服务提供者激励措施在社区医疗中提高结直肠癌筛查接受率的有效性:以加利福尼亚州一家联邦合格健康中心为例
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):898-904. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954166. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
Effectiveness and cost of multilayered colorectal cancer screening promotion interventions at federally qualified health centers in Washington State.华盛顿州联邦合格健康中心实施的多层结直肠癌筛查推广干预措施的效果和成本。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 1;124(21):4121-4129. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31693. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
3
The Effectiveness and Cost to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Federally Qualified Homeless Clinic in Eastern Kentucky.在肯塔基州东部一家符合联邦资格的无家可归者诊所提高结直肠癌筛查的有效性和成本
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):905-909. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954165. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
4
Cost and Effectiveness of Reminders to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Rural Federally Qualified Health Centers in West Virginia.西弗吉尼亚州农村联邦合格健康中心促进结直肠癌筛查的提醒措施的成本与效果
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):891-897. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954164. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
5
Monthly Variations in Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests Among Federally Qualified Health Center Patients in Missouri: Quality Improvement Project.密苏里州联邦合格健康中心患者结直肠癌筛查测试的月度变化:质量改进项目
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Mar 19;11:e64809. doi: 10.2196/64809.
6
Examining the Sustainability of Core Capacity and Evidence-Based Interventions for FIT-Based CRC Screening: California Colorectal Cancer Control Program.基于 FIT 的 CRC 筛查的核心能力和循证干预措施的可持续性研究:加利福尼亚州结直肠癌控制计划。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241255218. doi: 10.1177/10732748241255218.
7
Effectiveness and Cost of Implementing Evidence-Based Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among an Underserved Population in Chicago.在芝加哥一个服务不足的人群中实施循证干预措施以提高结直肠癌筛查率的有效性和成本
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):884-890. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954162. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
8
Centralized Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.在联邦合格健康中心开展集中结直肠癌筛查外展活动:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2446693. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46693.
9
Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.社区健康诊所中邮寄式结直肠癌筛查推广项目的效果:STOP CRC 整群随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;178(9):1174-1181. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3629.
10
Colorectal cancer screening interventions in 2 health care systems serving disadvantaged populations: Screening uptake and cost-effectiveness.为服务弱势群体的 2 个医疗保健系统中的结直肠癌筛查干预措施:筛查参与度和成本效益。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 1;124(21):4130-4136. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31691. Epub 2018 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the Sustainability of Core Capacity and Evidence-Based Interventions for FIT-Based CRC Screening: California Colorectal Cancer Control Program.基于 FIT 的 CRC 筛查的核心能力和循证干预措施的可持续性研究:加利福尼亚州结直肠癌控制计划。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241255218. doi: 10.1177/10732748241255218.
2
Integrated interventions and supporting activities to increase uptake of multiple cancer screenings: conceptual framework, determinants of implementation success, measurement challenges, and research priorities.增加多种癌症筛查接受度的综合干预措施及支持活动:概念框架、实施成功的决定因素、测量挑战及研究重点
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Oct 5;3(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00353-8.
3
Economic Evaluation of Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening at Federally Qualified Health Centers.联邦合格医疗中心增加结直肠癌筛查干预措施的经济评估
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):877-883. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954168. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost and Effectiveness of Reminders to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Rural Federally Qualified Health Centers in West Virginia.西弗吉尼亚州农村联邦合格健康中心促进结直肠癌筛查的提醒措施的成本与效果
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):891-897. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954164. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
Economic Evaluation of Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening at Federally Qualified Health Centers.联邦合格医疗中心增加结直肠癌筛查干预措施的经济评估
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):877-883. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954168. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
3
Effectiveness and cost of multilayered colorectal cancer screening promotion interventions at federally qualified health centers in Washington State.华盛顿州联邦合格健康中心实施的多层结直肠癌筛查推广干预措施的效果和成本。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 1;124(21):4121-4129. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31693. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
4
Outreach for Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Budget Impact Analysis for Community Health Centers.年度结直肠癌筛查的推广:社区卫生中心的预算影响分析
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Feb;50(2):e54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
5
Improving breast and colon cancer screening rates: a comparison of letters, automated phone calls, or both.提高乳腺癌和结肠癌筛查率:信件、自动电话或两者联用的比较
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;28(1):46-54. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140174.
6
Cost-effectiveness of a standard intervention versus a navigated intervention on colorectal cancer screening use in primary care.标准干预与导航干预在初级保健中对结直肠癌筛查应用的成本效益比较。
Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120(7):1042-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28535. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
7
Cost effectiveness of interventions to promote screening for colorectal cancer: a randomized trial.促进结直肠癌筛查干预措施的成本效益:一项随机试验。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2011 May;44(3):101-10. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2011.44.3.101.

考察医疗服务提供者激励措施在社区医疗中提高结直肠癌筛查接受率的有效性:以加利福尼亚州一家联邦合格健康中心为例

Examining the Effectiveness of Provider Incentives to Increase CRC Screening Uptake in Neighborhood Healthcare: A California Federally Qualified Health Center.

作者信息

Barajas Melissa, Tangka Florence K L, Schultz James, Tantod Kulin, Kempster Ying Marilyn, Omelu Ndukaku, Hoover Sonja, Thomas Melonie, Richmond-Reese Valerie, Subramanian Sujha

机构信息

Neighborhood Healthcare, Escondido, CA, USA.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):898-904. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954166. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1177/1524839920954166
PMID:32990046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7894068/
Abstract

As an awardee of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program, the California Department of Public Health partnered with Neighborhood Healthcare to implement evidence-based interventions and provider incentives (incentives offered to support staff, e.g., medical assistants, phlebotomists, front office staff, lab technicians) to improve colorectal cancer screening uptake. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and cost of the provider incentive intervention implemented by Neighborhood Healthcare to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake. We collected and analyzed process and cost data to assess fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kit return rates to the health centers and the number of completed FIT kits. We estimated the costs of the preexisting interventions and the new interventions. Analyses were conducted for two time periods: preimplementation and implementation. Most Neighborhood Healthcare health centers experienced an increase in the percentage of FIT kit returns (average of 3.6 percentage points) and individuals screened (an average increase of 111 FIT kits per month) from the baseline period through the implementation period. The cost of the incentive intervention for each additional screen was $66.79. In conclusion, the results indicate that incentive programs can have an overall positive impact on both the percentage of FIT kits returned and the number of individuals screened.

摘要

作为美国疾病控制与预防中心结直肠癌控制项目的受奖方,加利福尼亚州公共卫生部与邻里医疗合作,实施基于证据的干预措施和提供者激励措施(向支持人员提供的激励措施,如医疗助理、采血技师、前台工作人员、实验室技术人员),以提高结直肠癌筛查的参与率。本研究的目的是评估邻里医疗实施的提供者激励干预措施在提高结直肠癌筛查参与率方面的有效性和成本。我们收集并分析了过程和成本数据,以评估粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)试剂盒返回健康中心的比率以及完成检测的FIT试剂盒数量。我们估算了现有干预措施和新干预措施的成本。针对两个时间段进行了分析:实施前和实施期间。从基线期到实施期,大多数邻里医疗健康中心的FIT试剂盒返回率(平均提高3.6个百分点)和接受筛查的人数(平均每月增加111个FIT试剂盒)都有所增加。每增加一次筛查,激励干预措施的成本为66.79美元。总之,结果表明激励项目对FIT试剂盒返回率和接受筛查的人数都能产生总体积极影响。