• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间中国省级收入不平等对育儿方式的影响

Impact of Provincial Income Inequality on Parenting Styles in China during COVID-19.

作者信息

Jin Rui, Liu Na, Zhou Hao, Zhao Mingren

机构信息

Faculty of Education, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.

Faculty of College of Foreign Languages, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 10;14(7):587. doi: 10.3390/bs14070587.

DOI:10.3390/bs14070587
PMID:39062410
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11273907/
Abstract

Research on Chinese parenting styles using representative samples is limited, particularly during COVID-19, with most studies focusing on individual factors while neglecting regional influences. This study examines the impact of provincial income inequality, measured by the Gini coefficient, on parenting styles and how these effects vary across subgroups. Using data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) 2020, encompassing 3768 children aged 7-16 years from 25 regions, we employed a multinomial logistic regression model to analyze the predictability of provincial income inequality on parenting styles identified through latent class analysis. Three parenting styles emerged during the first year of COVID-19: authoritarian (48.2%), autonomy granting (27.7%), and average-level undifferentiated (24.1%). A higher Gini coefficient related to a greater likelihood of parents adopting authoritarian or autonomy-granting parenting styles over average-level undifferentiated parenting. Subgroup analyses revealed a higher likelihood of adopting autonomy-granting and authoritarian parenting for male children compared to female. Mothers with lower education levels and parents in rural areas tend to favor authoritarian parenting in response to higher income inequality. This trend was less evident among more educated mothers and parents living in urban areas. These findings suggest that parenting styles in China are influenced by complex and region-specific factors.

摘要

使用具有代表性样本对中国育儿方式的研究有限,尤其是在新冠疫情期间,大多数研究关注个体因素,而忽视了地区影响。本研究考察了以基尼系数衡量的省级收入不平等对育儿方式的影响,以及这些影响在不同亚组中的差异。利用中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)2020年的数据,涵盖来自25个地区的3768名7至16岁儿童,我们采用多项逻辑回归模型来分析省级收入不平等对通过潜在类别分析确定的育儿方式的预测能力。在新冠疫情的第一年出现了三种育儿方式:专制型(48.2%)、给予自主型(27.7%)和平均水平无差异型(24.1%)。较高的基尼系数与父母采用专制型或给予自主型育儿方式而非平均水平无差异型育儿方式的可能性更大有关。亚组分析显示,与女性相比,男性儿童采用给予自主型和专制型育儿方式的可能性更高。教育水平较低的母亲和农村地区的父母在面对较高的收入不平等时倾向于支持专制型育儿。在受教育程度较高的母亲和城市地区的父母中,这种趋势不太明显。这些发现表明,中国的育儿方式受到复杂且特定于地区的因素影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c6e/11273907/dfc494a3340c/behavsci-14-00587-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c6e/11273907/dfc494a3340c/behavsci-14-00587-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c6e/11273907/dfc494a3340c/behavsci-14-00587-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Provincial Income Inequality on Parenting Styles in China during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间中国省级收入不平等对育儿方式的影响
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 10;14(7):587. doi: 10.3390/bs14070587.
2
Adolescents' Filial Piety Attitudes in Relation to Their Perceived Parenting Styles: An Urban-Rural Comparative Longitudinal Study in China.青少年的孝道态度与其所感知的父母教养方式的关系:中国城乡比较纵向研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 24;12:750751. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.750751. eCollection 2021.
3
Application of latent profile analysis to define subgroups of parenting styles and food parenting practices.应用潜在剖面分析定义父母教养风格和食物养育实践的亚组。
Appetite. 2019 Aug 1;139:8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
4
Parenting styles in a cultural context: observations of "protective parenting" in first-generation Latinos.文化背景下的育儿方式:对第一代拉丁裔“保护性育儿”的观察
Fam Process. 2009 Jun;48(2):195-210. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01277.x.
5
Parenting style and child mental health at preschool age: evidence from rural China.育儿方式与学龄前儿童心理健康:来自中国农村的证据。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 24;24(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05707-1.
6
Parenting styles are associated with overall child dietary quality within low-income and food-insecure households.养育方式与低收入和食物无保障家庭中儿童整体饮食质量有关。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Oct;22(15):2835-2843. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019001332. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
7
Parent emotional distress and feeding styles in low-income families. The role of parent depression and parenting stress.低收入家庭中父母的情绪困扰与喂养方式。父母抑郁和育儿压力的作用。
Appetite. 2015 Sep;92:337-42. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
8
The association of different parenting styles among depressed parents and their offspring's depression and anxiety: a cross-sectional study.不同教养方式的抑郁父母与其子女抑郁和焦虑的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 9;21(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03512-8.
9
Parenting styles and home obesogenic environments.养育方式和家庭致肥胖环境。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Apr;9(4):1411-26. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9041411. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
10
Parental feeding practices predict authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive parenting styles.父母的喂养方式预示着权威型、专制型和放任型的育儿方式。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Jul;108(7):1154-61; discussion 1161-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.04.008.

本文引用的文献

1
Transitions in patterns of caregiver involvement before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A latent transition analysis.新冠疫情之前及期间照料者参与模式的转变:一项潜在转变分析
Early Child Res Q. 2023;65:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 May 22.
2
Annual Research Review: Cross-cultural similarities and differences in parenting.年度研究综述:育儿的跨文化相似与差异。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;63(4):466-479. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13539. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
3
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Home Quarantine Strategy Implementation Among Chinese Residents During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.
2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间中国居民家庭隔离策略实施的患病率及危险因素
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 14;12:679538. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679538. eCollection 2021.
4
Parenting During COVID-19: A Study of Parents' Experiences Across Gender and Income Levels.新冠疫情期间的育儿:一项关于不同性别和收入水平父母经历的研究。
Fam Relat. 2021 Dec;70(5):1327-1342. doi: 10.1111/fare.12571. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
5
Higher Levels of Harsh Parenting During the COVID-19 Lockdown in the Netherlands.新冠疫情封锁期间荷兰严厉型教养水平升高。
Child Maltreat. 2022 May;27(2):156-162. doi: 10.1177/10775595211024748. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
6
Supporting families to protect child health: Parenting quality and household needs during the COVID-19 pandemic.支持家庭保护儿童健康:新冠疫情期间的育儿质量和家庭需求。
PLoS One. 2021 May 24;16(5):e0251720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251720. eCollection 2021.
7
Experiences With COVID-19 Stressors and Parents' Use of Neglectful, Harsh, and Positive Parenting Practices in the Northeastern United States.美国东北部地区父母经历 COVID-19 压力源与忽视、严厉和积极教养行为的使用。
Child Maltreat. 2021 Aug;26(3):255-266. doi: 10.1177/10775595211006465. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
8
Are less aggressive national lockdowns in COVID-19 associated with enhanced economic activity?在新冠疫情中,力度较小的全国性封锁措施是否与经济活动增强有关?
QJM. 2021 Oct 7;114(6):359-361. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcab021.
9
Parental Social Isolation and Child Maltreatment Risk during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间父母的社会隔离与儿童遭受虐待的风险
J Fam Violence. 2022;37(5):813-824. doi: 10.1007/s10896-020-00244-3. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
10
Practitioner's Guide to Latent Class Analysis: Methodological Considerations and Common Pitfalls.潜类分析实用指南:方法学考虑因素及常见陷阱。
Crit Care Med. 2021 Jan 1;49(1):e63-e79. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004710.