• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良经椎间孔全内镜下椎间盘切除术:“手递外入路(HDOI)”技术的疗效

Enhancing Transforaminal Full Endoscopic Discectomy: Efficacy of the Hand Down Outside-In (HDOI) Technique.

作者信息

Yamaguchi Yushi, Ono Koichiro, Fukuhara Daisuke, Dezawa Akira, Majima Tokifumi

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan.

Meiryu-kai Dezawa Akira PED Clinic, Tokyo 214-0014, Japan.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2024 Jun 25;14(7):679. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070679.

DOI:10.3390/jpm14070679
PMID:39063933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11278453/
Abstract

Endoscopic lumbar discectomy (ELD) is a key advancement in minimally invasive spinal surgery, particularly for lumbar disc herniation. Interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) and transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) are the two major methods used for FED. TELD, while less familiar to spine surgeons inexperienced in endoscopic surgery, presents challenges in visualizing the dura mater, a crucial aspect for reducing surgical complications. The hand down outside-in (HDOI) technique introduced by Dezawa enhances this visualization by positioning the cannula tip dorsally on the intervertebral disc and maneuvering it between the dura mater and disc to the spinal canal's midpoint. The cannula is then flipped to directly visualize the dura mater, enabling safe removal of the prolapsed disc material. A comparative study involving 20 patients treated from April 2020 to April 2022 examined the efficacy of the HDOI technique against conventional TELD. Each group, comprising ten patients, underwent ELD for lumbar disc herniation. While both groups showed similar improvements in clinical outcomes, as assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the HDOI group exhibited a 100% success rate for dura mater visualization, and this rate is significantly higher than the 60% observed in the conventional TELD group. Additionally, the time required for dura mater visualization was notably shorter for the HDOI technique. These results indicate that the HDOI technique not only enhances the safety and efficacy of TELD but may also encourage its wider use in clinical settings.

摘要

内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(ELD)是微创脊柱手术的一项关键进展,尤其适用于腰椎间盘突出症。椎板间内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(IELD)和经椎间孔内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(TELD)是用于ELD的两种主要方法。TELD对于缺乏内镜手术经验的脊柱外科医生来说不太熟悉,在可视化硬脑膜方面存在挑战,而这是减少手术并发症的关键因素。Dezawa提出的由外向内(HDOI)技术通过将套管尖端置于椎间盘背侧并在硬脑膜和椎间盘之间操作使其到达椎管中点来增强这种可视化效果。然后将套管翻转以直接观察硬脑膜,从而能够安全地切除脱出的椎间盘物质。一项涉及2020年4月至2022年4月治疗的20例患者的比较研究,考察了HDOI技术与传统TELD相比的疗效。每组10例患者,均接受了针对腰椎间盘突出症的ELD。虽然使用日本骨科协会(JOA)评分和疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估时两组的临床结果改善相似,但HDOI组硬脑膜可视化成功率为100%,这一比率显著高于传统TELD组观察到的60%。此外,HDOI技术观察硬脑膜所需的时间明显更短。这些结果表明,HDOI技术不仅提高了TELD的安全性和疗效,还可能促使其在临床环境中更广泛地应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca0/11278453/7c8212b00750/jpm-14-00679-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca0/11278453/255a1ff6821b/jpm-14-00679-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca0/11278453/1b21cb95f48e/jpm-14-00679-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca0/11278453/0957f752b1cd/jpm-14-00679-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca0/11278453/2406dba30f82/jpm-14-00679-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca0/11278453/7c8212b00750/jpm-14-00679-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca0/11278453/255a1ff6821b/jpm-14-00679-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca0/11278453/1b21cb95f48e/jpm-14-00679-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca0/11278453/0957f752b1cd/jpm-14-00679-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca0/11278453/2406dba30f82/jpm-14-00679-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca0/11278453/7c8212b00750/jpm-14-00679-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Enhancing Transforaminal Full Endoscopic Discectomy: Efficacy of the Hand Down Outside-In (HDOI) Technique.改良经椎间孔全内镜下椎间盘切除术:“手递外入路(HDOI)”技术的疗效
J Pers Med. 2024 Jun 25;14(7):679. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070679.
2
Transforaminal Versus Interlaminar Approach of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Under Local Anesthesia for L5/S1 Disc Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.局麻下单侧入路椎间孔镜与椎板间入路内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗 L5/S1 椎间盘突出症的随机对照研究
Pain Physician. 2022 Nov;25(8):E1191-E1198.
3
Early Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L4-5 Highly Down-Migrated Disc Herniation: Interlaminar Approach Versus Transforaminal Approach.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗 L4-5 高位向下迁移型椎间盘突出症的早期临床疗效:经椎间孔入路与经皮入路比较。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Feb;146:e413-e418. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.105. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
4
A Narrative Review of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using Interlaminar Approach.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术的临床疗效分析。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Dec;168:324-332. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.080.
5
Comparison of the Interlaminar and Transforaminal Approaches for Full-endoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of L4/5 Lumbar Disc Herniation.对比经椎间孔入路与后正中入路全内镜下治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2023 Jul 15;63(7):313-320. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0357. Epub 2023 May 11.
6
Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Comparative Cohort Study with a 5-Year Follow-Up.经皮椎间孔镜腰椎间盘切除术与开放腰椎显微切除术的比较:一项 5 年随访的对照队列研究。
Pain Physician. 2019 May;22(3):295-304.
7
Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Narrative Review.椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术:一项叙述性综述。
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Dec;15(suppl 3):S47-S53. doi: 10.14444/8163.
8
Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy using a 45° puncture angle and foraminotomy versus traditional THESYS for L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术采用 45°穿刺角度和椎间孔成形术与传统的 THESYS 治疗 L5/S1 腰椎间盘突出症:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Feb;33(2):453-462. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08117-1. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
9
Clinical efficacy of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar degenerative diseases: A minimum 6-year follow-up.经椎间孔内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效:至少6年随访
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 15;9:1004709. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1004709. eCollection 2022.
10
Recurrent upper lumbar disc herniation treated via the transforaminal approach using microendoscopy-assisted lumbar discectomy: a case report.经椎间孔入路使用显微内镜辅助腰椎间盘切除术治疗复发性上腰椎间盘突出症:一例报告
J Med Case Rep. 2018 Apr 27;12(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13256-018-1653-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Approach for Lumbar Discectomy.全内镜经椎间孔入路腰椎间盘切除术
J Vis Exp. 2023 Sep 8(199). doi: 10.3791/65508.
2
Resorption of Lumbar Disk Herniation: Mechanisms, Clinical Predictors, and Future Directions.腰椎间盘突出症的吸收:机制、临床预测因素及未来方向。
JBJS Rev. 2023 Jan 4;11(1). doi: e22.00148. eCollection 2023 Jan 1.
3
A Narrative Review of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using Interlaminar Approach.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术的临床疗效分析。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Dec;168:324-332. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.080.
4
Evaluation of Endoscopic Versus Open Lumbar Discectomy: A Multi-Center Retrospective Review Utilizing the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Database.内镜下与开放性腰椎间盘切除术的评估:利用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库进行的多中心回顾性研究。
Cureus. 2022 May 22;14(5):e25202. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25202. eCollection 2022 May.
5
Full endoscopic versus open discectomy for sciatica: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.全内镜与开放椎间盘切除术治疗坐骨神经痛:随机对照非劣效性试验。
BMJ. 2022 Feb 21;376:e065846. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-065846.
6
Five-year clinical outcomes with endoscopic transforaminal foraminoplasty for symptomatic degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine: a comparative study of versus techniques.经椎间孔内镜下腰椎管扩大成形术治疗腰椎症状性退变疾病的五年临床疗效:两种技术的对比研究
J Spine Surg. 2020 Jan;6(Suppl 1):S66-S83. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.06.08.
7
Incidence and Implications of Incidental Durotomy in Transforaminal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Case Series.经椎间孔内镜脊柱手术中意外硬脊膜切开的发生率及影响:病例系列
World Neurosurg. 2020 Feb;134:e951-e955. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.045. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
8
Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Comparative Cohort Study with a 5-Year Follow-Up.经皮椎间孔镜腰椎间盘切除术与开放腰椎显微切除术的比较:一项 5 年随访的对照队列研究。
Pain Physician. 2019 May;22(3):295-304.
9
Influence of timing of surgery on Cauda equina syndrome: Outcomes at a national spinal centre.手术时机对马尾综合征的影响:国家脊柱中心的治疗结果
J Orthop. 2018 Feb 28;15(1):210-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.01.020. eCollection 2018 Mar.
10
Full-endoscopic versus micro-endoscopic and open discectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and complications.全内镜与微内镜及开放椎间盘切除术:结局与并发症的系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;154:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 8.