Morimoto Masatoshi, Sugiura Kosuke, Manabe Hiroaki, Tezuka Fumitake, Yamashita Kazuta, Takata Yoichiro, Higashino Kosaku, Sakai Toshinori, Chikawa Takashi, Nagamachi Akihiro, Maeda Toru, Sairyo Koichi
Department of Orthopedics, Tokushima University Graduate School, Institute of Health Sciences.
Department of Orthopedics, Shikoku Medical Center for Children and Adults.
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2024 Sep 15;64(9):330-338. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0225. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
This study compared the 1-year clinical outcomes and disc degeneration rates after transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TF-FED), condoliase injection, open discectomy (OD), and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). In total, 279 patients with LDH were divided into four treatment groups: TF-FED, OD, MED, and condoliase injection. Outcomes were evaluated on the basis of the complication rate, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and the modified MacNab criteria. Surgical and hospital costs were assessed. Disc degeneration and endplate bone marrow edema were evaluated using magnetic resonance images. The mean postoperative JOABPEQ, VAS, or modified MacNab scores among the four groups had no significant differences. Additionally, the nerve injury or reoperation rate among the TF-FED, OD, and MED groups had no significant difference. However, the reoperation rate with condoliase injection was high because of residual disc herniation. Surgical and hospital costs were lower with condoliase injection and higher with OD and MED than those with TF-FED. With TF-FED and condoliase injection, the Pfirrmann grade progressed, and the disc height was significantly smaller than that with OD and MED. Endplate bone marrow edema was more common with condoliase injection and TF-FED. All groups had good outcomes. TF-FED and condoliase injection may reduce the burden of surgery because they can be performed under local anesthesia with little blood loss and low medical costs but tend to be associated with disc degeneration and endplate bone marrow edema. A randomized controlled study with a larger sample is needed.
本研究比较了经椎间孔全内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(TF-FED)、孔道成形术注射、开放椎间盘切除术(OD)和显微内镜下椎间盘切除术(MED)治疗腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)后的1年临床疗效和椎间盘退变率。总共279例LDH患者被分为四个治疗组:TF-FED组、OD组、MED组和孔道成形术注射组。根据并发症发生率、日本骨科协会腰痛评估问卷(JOABPEQ)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和改良MacNab标准对疗效进行评估。评估手术和住院费用。使用磁共振成像评估椎间盘退变和终板骨髓水肿情况。四组之间术后平均JOABPEQ、VAS或改良MacNab评分无显著差异。此外,TF-FED组、OD组和MED组之间的神经损伤或再次手术率无显著差异。然而,由于残留椎间盘突出,孔道成形术注射的再次手术率较高。孔道成形术注射的手术和住院费用低于TF-FED组,OD组和MED组高于TF-FED组。TF-FED组和孔道成形术注射组的Pfirrmann分级进展,椎间盘高度明显小于OD组和MED组。终板骨髓水肿在孔道成形术注射组和TF-FED组中更常见。所有组的疗效均良好。TF-FED组和孔道成形术注射组可能会减轻手术负担,因为它们可以在局部麻醉下进行,出血量少且医疗成本低,但往往与椎间盘退变和终板骨髓水肿有关。需要进行一项更大样本量的随机对照研究。