Xie Qiang, Dyer Rachel L, Lam Sin U, Frye Corrina, Dahl Cortland J, Quanbeck Andrew, Nahum-Shani Inbal, Davidson Richard J, Goldberg Simon B
Department of Counseling Psychology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Center for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Mindfulness (N Y). 2024 Feb;15(2):479-490. doi: 10.1007/s12671-024-02304-x. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
Informal practice (i.e., brief meditation practices incorporated spontaneously into daily activities) may be important for increasing the efficacy and accessibility of meditation-based interventions (MedBIs). However, the facilitators and barriers to engaging in informal practice are largely unknown. The current study aimed to investigate factors associated with the implementation of informal practice.
Participants were drawn from a randomized trial testing the effects of 5- versus 15-min daily meditation practice in a 4-week smartphone-delivered meditation training. Qualitative interviews on informal practice were conducted with 17 participants (mean age: 37.12 years; 82.35% female; 52.94% non-Latinx White) following the intervention. Given that prior knowledge on this topic is limited, inductive content analysis was utilized to characterize participants' experiences in relation to implementing informal practice.
Four overarching categories emerged from the data, namely (a) reported benefits of informal practice, (b) integration of informal practice, (c) perceived barriers to informal practice, and (d) recommended facilitators of informal practice.
This study underscores the importance of addressing barriers and facilitators (e.g., providing personalized app features, reminders, social support, and repeating intervention content) to encourage individuals' informal practice. Findings provide suggestions for methods to increase engagement in informal practice, which may, in turn, increase the accessibility and effectiveness of MedBIs.
The larger trial from which the qualitative interview participants were drawn was preregistered through clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05229406) and the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/fszvj/?view_only=039b14ccbf8848bd99808c983070b635). The qualitative analyses reported here were not preregistered.
非正式练习(即自发融入日常活动的简短冥想练习)对于提高基于冥想的干预措施(MedBIs)的效果和可及性可能很重要。然而,参与非正式练习的促进因素和障碍在很大程度上尚不清楚。本研究旨在调查与非正式练习实施相关的因素。
参与者来自一项随机试验,该试验在为期4周的通过智能手机提供的冥想训练中测试每日5分钟与15分钟冥想练习的效果。干预后,对17名参与者(平均年龄:37.12岁;82.35%为女性;52.94%为非拉丁裔白人)进行了关于非正式练习的定性访谈。鉴于此前关于该主题的知识有限,采用归纳式内容分析法来描述参与者在实施非正式练习方面的经历。
数据中出现了四个总体类别,即(a)报告的非正式练习的益处,(b)非正式练习的融入,(c)感知到的非正式练习的障碍,以及(d)推荐的非正式练习的促进因素。
本研究强调了解决障碍和促进因素(例如提供个性化应用功能、提醒、社会支持以及重复干预内容)以鼓励个体进行非正式练习的重要性。研究结果为增加参与非正式练习的方法提供了建议,这反过来可能会提高MedBIs的可及性和有效性。
定性访谈参与者所来自的更大规模试验已通过clinicaltrials.gov(NCT05229406)和开放科学框架(https://osf.io/fszvj/?view_only=039b14ccbf8848bd99808c983070b635)进行了预注册。此处报告的定性分析未进行预注册。