Suppr超能文献

2019年冠状病毒病大流行对急性冠状动脉综合征临床实践模式的影响:来自中国一项多中心临床医生调查的结果

Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Acute Coronary Syndrome Clinical Practice Patterns: Findings from a Multicenter Clinician Survey in China.

作者信息

Hu Feng, Zang Minhua, Zheng Lihui, Chen Wensheng, Guo Jinrui, Du Zhongpeng, Liang Erpeng, Shen Lishui, Hu Xiaofeng, Zheng Dezhong, Xu Xuelian, Hu Gaifeng, Li Aihua, Huang Jianfeng, Yao Yan, Pu Jun

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, 200030 Shanghai, China.

Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100730 Beijing, China.

出版信息

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 25;23(11):362. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2311362. eCollection 2022 Nov.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has severely affected healthcare systems around the world. This study aimed to investigate the perceptions of cardiologists regarding how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the clinical practice patterns for acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

A multicenter clinician survey was sent to 300 cardiologists working in 22 provinces in China. The survey collected demographic information and inquired about their perceptions of how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected ACS clinical practice patterns.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 211 (70.3%) cardiologists, 82.5% of whom were employed in tertiary hospitals, and 52.1% reported more than 10 years of clinical cardiology practice. Most respondents observed a reduction in ACS inpatients and outpatients in their hospitals during the pandemic. Only 29.9% of the respondents had access to a dedicated catheter room for the treatment of COVID-19-positive ACS patients. Most respondents stated that the COVID-19 pandemic had varying degrees of effect on the treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and unstable angina. Compared with the assumed non-pandemic period, in the designed clinical questions, the selection of coronary interventional therapy for STEMI, NSTEMI, and unstable angina during the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly decreased (all 0.05), and the selection of pharmacotherapy was increased (all 0.05). The selection of fibrinolytic therapy for STEMI during the pandemic was higher than in the assumed non-pandemic period ( 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected ACS clinical practice patterns. The use of invasive therapies significantly decreased during the pandemic period, whereas pharmacotherapy was more often prescribed by the cardiologists.

摘要

背景

2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行严重影响了全球医疗系统。本研究旨在调查心脏病专家对COVID-19大流行如何影响急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)临床实践模式的看法。

方法

向在中国22个省份工作的300名心脏病专家发送了一份多中心临床医生调查问卷。该调查收集了人口统计学信息,并询问了他们对COVID-19大流行如何影响ACS临床实践模式的看法。

结果

211名(70.3%)心脏病专家完成了调查,其中82.5%受雇于三级医院,52.1%报告有超过10年的临床心脏病学实践经验。大多数受访者观察到在大流行期间其所在医院的ACS住院患者和门诊患者有所减少。只有29.9%的受访者有专门用于治疗COVID-19阳性ACS患者的导管室。大多数受访者表示,COVID-19大流行对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)、急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)和不稳定型心绞痛的治疗有不同程度的影响。与假定的非大流行时期相比,在设计的临床问题中,COVID-19大流行期间STEMI、NSTEMI和不稳定型心绞痛的冠状动脉介入治疗选择显著减少(均P<0.05),药物治疗选择增加(均P<0.05)。大流行期间STEMI的溶栓治疗选择高于假定的非大流行时期(P<0.05)。

结论

COVID-19大流行深刻影响了ACS临床实践模式。在大流行期间侵入性治疗的使用显著减少,而心脏病专家更常开具药物治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3c4/11269060/18576940dce1/2153-8174-23-11-362-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验