Fan Xingman, Li Yanyan, He Qiongyi, Wang Meng, Lan Xiaohua, Zhang Kaijie, Ma Chenyue, Zhang Haitao
Graduate School, Hebei North University, 075000 Zhangjiakou, Hebei, China.
Department of Cardiology, Air Force Medical Center, Air Force Medical University, PLA,100142 Beijing, China.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Nov 16;24(11):315. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2411315. eCollection 2023 Nov.
Accurate detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation is crucial. In this study, we aimed to conduct a systematic review of machine-learning-based recurrence detection in the relevant literature.
We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from 1980 to December 31, 2022 to identify studies on prediction models for AF recurrence risk after catheter ablation. We used the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST) to assess the risk of bias, and R4.2.0 for meta-analysis, with subgroup analysis based on model type.
After screening, 40 papers were eligible for synthesis. The pooled concordance index (C-index) in the training set was 0.760 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.739 to 0.781), the sensitivity was 0.74 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.77), and the specificity was 0.76 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.80). The combined C-index in the validation set was 0.787 (95% CI 0.752 to 0.821), the sensitivity was 0.78 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.83), and the specificity was 0.75 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.82). The subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in the pooled C-index between models constructed based on radiomics features and those based on clinical characteristics. However, radiomics based showed a slightly higher sensitivity (training set: 0.82 0.71, validation set: 0.83 0.73). Logistic regression, one of the most common machine learning (ML) methods, exhibited an overall pooled C-index of 0.785 and 0.804 in the training and validation sets, respectively. The Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) models outperformed these results with an overall pooled C-index of 0.862 and 0.861. Age, radiomics features, left atrial diameter, AF type, and AF duration were identified as the key modeling variables.
ML has demonstrated excellent performance in predicting AF recurrence after catheter ablation. Logistic regression (LR) being the most widely used ML algorithm for predicting AF recurrence, also showed high accuracy. The development of risk prediction nomograms for wide application is warranted.
准确检测导管消融术后房颤(AF)复发至关重要。在本研究中,我们旨在对相关文献中基于机器学习的复发检测进行系统评价。
我们全面检索了1980年至2022年12月31日的PubMed、Embase、Cochrane和Web of Science数据库,以识别关于导管消融术后房颤复发风险预测模型的研究。我们使用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)评估偏倚风险,并使用R4.2.0进行荟萃分析,并根据模型类型进行亚组分析。
筛选后,40篇论文符合综合分析要求。训练集中的合并一致性指数(C指数)为0.760(95%置信区间[CI]0.739至0.781),灵敏度为0.74(95%CI 0.69至0.77),特异性为0.76(95%CI 0.72至0.80)。验证集中的合并C指数为0.787(95%CI 0.752至0.821),灵敏度为0.78(95%CI 0.73至0.83),特异性为0.75(95%CI 0.65至0.82)。亚组分析显示,基于放射组学特征构建的模型与基于临床特征构建的模型在合并C指数上无显著差异。然而,基于放射组学的模型显示出略高的灵敏度(训练集:0.82对0.71,验证集:0.83对0.73)。逻辑回归是最常见的机器学习(ML)方法之一,在训练集和验证集中的总体合并C指数分别为0.785和0.804。卷积神经网络(CNN)模型的表现优于这些结果,总体合并C指数为0.862和0.861。年龄、放射组学特征、左心房直径、房颤类型和房颤持续时间被确定为关键建模变量。
机器学习在预测导管消融术后房颤复发方面表现出优异的性能。逻辑回归(LR)作为预测房颤复发最广泛使用的机器学习算法,也显示出高准确性。有必要开发风险预测列线图以供广泛应用。