• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Capturing Usability Problems for People Living With Dementia by Applying the DEMIGNED Principles in Usability Evaluation Methods: Mixed Methods Study.通过在可用性评估方法中应用 DEMIGNED 原则来捕捉患有痴呆症的人的可用性问题:混合方法研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jul 31;11:e54032. doi: 10.2196/54032.
2
Usability testing of Avoiding Diabetes Thru Action Plan Targeting (ADAPT) decision support for integrating care-based counseling of pre-diabetes in an electronic health record.通过行动计划目标预防糖尿病(ADAPT)决策支持系统在电子健康记录中整合基于护理的糖尿病前期咨询的可用性测试。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Sep;83(9):636-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 23.
3
Mobile Health for Smoking Cessation Among Disadvantaged Young Women During and After Pregnancy: User-Centered Design and Usability Study.孕期及产后弱势年轻女性戒烟的移动健康应用:以用户为中心的设计与可用性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Aug 4;5(8):e24112. doi: 10.2196/24112.
4
Development of an Intervention Targeting Multiple Health Behaviors Among High School Students: Participatory Design Study Using Heuristic Evaluation and Usability Testing.开发一项针对高中生多种健康行为的干预措施:使用启发式评估和可用性测试的参与式设计研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 29;8(10):e17999. doi: 10.2196/17999.
5
A Mobile Phone-Based App for Use During Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adolescents With Anxiety (MindClimb): User-Centered Design and Usability Study.基于手机的应用程序在青少年焦虑认知行为治疗中的应用(MindClimb):以用户为中心的设计和可用性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Dec 8;8(12):e18439. doi: 10.2196/18439.
6
A Concise and Practical Framework for the Development and Usability Evaluation of Patient Information Websites.患者信息网站开发与可用性评估的简洁实用框架
Appl Clin Inform. 2015 Jun 12;6(2):383-99. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-11-RA-0109. eCollection 2015.
7
Digital Storytelling Intervention for Enhancing the Social Participation of People With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Co-Design and Usability Study.数字故事讲述干预对轻度认知障碍患者社会参与的增强作用:共同设计与可用性研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Jan 17;7:e54138. doi: 10.2196/54138.
8
Development and Usability Testing of a Web-Based and Therapist-Assisted Coping Skills Program for Managing Psychosocial Problems in Individuals With Hand and Upper Limb Injuries: Mixed Methods Study.基于网络且由治疗师辅助的应对技能项目在手部及上肢损伤个体心理社会问题管理中的开发与可用性测试:混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2020 May 6;7(2):e17088. doi: 10.2196/17088.
9
A usability design checklist for Mobile electronic data capturing forms: the validation process.移动电子数据采集表单的可用性设计检查表:验证过程。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jan 9;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0718-3.
10
Evaluating the Usability of an mHealth App for Empowering Cancer Survivors With Disabilities: Heuristic Evaluation and Usability Testing.评估一款赋能残疾癌症幸存者的移动健康应用程序的可用性:启发式评估和可用性测试。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Apr 2;11:e51522. doi: 10.2196/51522.

引用本文的文献

1
Usability assessment of a digital tool to enhance person-clinician communication in the memory clinic: An expert evaluation.一种用于加强记忆门诊中患者与临床医生沟通的数字工具的可用性评估:专家评估
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 6;11:20552076251365070. doi: 10.1177/20552076251365070. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Evaluation of eHealth Services Regarding Accessibility: Scoping Literature Review.电子健康服务的可及性开发与评估:范围文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 17;25:e45118. doi: 10.2196/45118.
2
European Projects for Patients with Dementia and Their Caregivers.面向痴呆症患者及其护理人员的欧洲项目。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1425:609-618. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-31986-0_59.
3
Digital therapeutics in the clinic.临床中的数字疗法。
Bioeng Transl Med. 2023 May 3;8(4):e10536. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10536. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Enhancing Inclusive mHealth Design for People Living with Dementia: Examples from Literature.增强面向痴呆症患者的包容性移动医疗设计:文献实例。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 May 18;302:646-650. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230228.
5
Problems and Barriers Related to the Use of Digital Health Applications: Scoping Review.数字健康应用使用相关问题及障碍:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 12;25:e43808. doi: 10.2196/43808.
6
Exploring the usability, user experience and usefulness of a supportive website for people with dementia and carers.探索一个支持痴呆症患者和照顾者的网站的可用性、用户体验和有用性。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 May;19(4):1369-1381. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2180546. Epub 2023 Apr 22.
7
Usability of a Community-Based Dementia Resource Website: Mixed Methods Study.基于社区的痴呆症资源网站的可用性:混合方法研究。
JMIR Aging. 2023 Apr 20;6:e40762. doi: 10.2196/40762.
8
A review of the factors influencing adoption of digital health applications for people living with dementia.影响痴呆症患者采用数字健康应用程序的因素综述。
Digit Health. 2023 Mar 15;9:20552076231162985. doi: 10.1177/20552076231162985. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
9
Digital healthcare for dementia and cognitive impairment: A scoping review.痴呆与认知障碍的数字医疗:一项范围综述
Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Apr;140:104413. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104413. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
10
Disability digital divide: survey of accessibility of eHealth services as perceived by people with and without impairment.残疾数字鸿沟:对有和没有障碍的人感知的电子健康服务可及性的调查。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 27;23(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15094-z.

通过在可用性评估方法中应用 DEMIGNED 原则来捕捉患有痴呆症的人的可用性问题:混合方法研究。

Capturing Usability Problems for People Living With Dementia by Applying the DEMIGNED Principles in Usability Evaluation Methods: Mixed Methods Study.

机构信息

eHealth Living & Learning Lab Amsterdam, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jul 31;11:e54032. doi: 10.2196/54032.

DOI:10.2196/54032
PMID:39083790
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11325128/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dementia-related impairments can cause complex barriers to access, use, and adopt digital health technologies (DHTs). These barriers can contribute to digital health inequities. Therefore, literature-based design principles called DEMIGNED have been developed to support the design and evaluation of DHTs for this rapidly increasing population.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to apply the DEMIGNED principles in usability evaluation methods to (1) capture usability problems on a mobile website providing information resources for people visiting a memory clinic, including those living with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or dementia, and (2) investigate the realness of usability problems captured by the DEMIGNED principles in expert testing, specifically for mobile websites that act as a means of providing DHTs.

METHODS

First, a heuristic evaluation was conducted, with the DEMIGNED principles serving as domain-specific guidelines, with 3 double experts (experienced in both usability and dementia) and 2 usability engineering experts. Second, think-aloud sessions were conducted with patients visiting a memory clinic who were living with SCD, MCI, or dementia.

RESULTS

The heuristic evaluation resulted in 36 unique usability problems. A representative sample of 7 people visiting a memory clinic participated in a think-aloud session, including 4 (57%) with SCD, 1 (14%) with MCI, and 2 (29%) with dementia. The analysis of the think-aloud sessions revealed 181 encounters with usability problems. Of these encounters, 144 (79.6%) could be mapped to 18 usability problems identified in the heuristic evaluation. The remaining 37 (20.4%) encounters from the user testing revealed another 10 unique usability problems. Usability problems frequently described in the think-aloud sessions encompassed difficulties with using the search function, discrepancies between the user's expectations and the content organization, the need for scrolling, information overload, and unclear system feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

By applying the DEMIGNED principles in expert testing, evaluators were able to capture 79.6% (144/181) of all usability problem encounters in the user testing of a mobile website for people visiting a memory clinic, including people living with dementia. Regarding unique usability problems, 50% (18/36) of the unique usability problems identified during the heuristic evaluation were captured by the user-testing sessions. Future research should look into the applicability of the DEMIGNED principles to other digital health functionalities to increase the accessibility of digital health and decrease digital health inequity for this complex and rapidly increasing population.

摘要

背景

与痴呆症相关的障碍会导致在获取、使用和采用数字健康技术(DHT)方面出现复杂的障碍。这些障碍可能导致数字健康方面的不平等。因此,已经开发了基于文献的设计原则,称为 DEMIGNED,以支持针对这一快速增长的人群的 DHT 的设计和评估。

目的

本研究旨在将 DEMIGNED 原则应用于可用性评估方法,以(1)捕捉移动网站上为访问记忆诊所的人们提供信息资源时出现的可用性问题,包括那些患有主观认知下降(SCD)、轻度认知障碍(MCI)或痴呆症的人,以及(2)调查专家测试中捕获的可用性问题的真实性,特别是针对作为提供 DHT 手段的移动网站。

方法

首先,进行了启发式评估,使用 DEMIGNED 原则作为特定于领域的指南,由 3 名双重专家(在可用性和痴呆症方面均有经验)和 2 名可用性工程专家进行评估。其次,对在记忆诊所就诊的患有 SCD、MCI 或痴呆症的患者进行了出声思维测试。

结果

启发式评估产生了 36 个独特的可用性问题。有代表性的 7 名就诊于记忆诊所的患者参加了出声思维测试,其中 4 名(57%)患有 SCD,1 名(14%)患有 MCI,2 名(29%)患有痴呆症。对出声思维测试的分析显示,共遇到 181 次可用性问题。在这些遇到的问题中,有 144 个(79.6%)可以映射到启发式评估中确定的 18 个可用性问题。用户测试中剩下的 37 个(20.4%)遇到的问题又揭示了另外 10 个独特的可用性问题。在出声思维测试中经常描述的可用性问题包括使用搜索功能的困难、用户的期望与内容组织之间的差异、滚动的需求、信息过载和系统反馈不明确。

结论

通过在专家测试中应用 DEMIGNED 原则,评估人员能够在对记忆诊所访客的移动网站的用户测试中捕获 79.6%(181/181)的所有可用性问题,包括患有痴呆症的人。关于独特的可用性问题,启发式评估中确定的 36 个独特可用性问题中有 18 个(50%)是通过用户测试会议捕获的。未来的研究应该研究 DEMIGNED 原则在其他数字健康功能中的适用性,以提高这一复杂且快速增长人群的数字健康可及性,并减少数字健康不平等。