Morales Ramos Jorge Guillermo, Fernández Tarrillo Leydy Mekinley, Guevara Bravo Anghelly Xiomara, Sánchez-Purihuamán Marilin, Carreño Farfán Carmen Rosa, Loayza Estrada Carolina Susana, Llontop Ynga Enrique Guillermo, De La Cruz Silva Horacio
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Escuela de Medicina Humana, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Lambayeque - Perú, Chiclayo, Lambayeque, 14001, Peru.
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Lambayeque - Perú, Chiclayo, Lambayeque, 14001, Peru.
F1000Res. 2024 Sep 2;13:745. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.151338.1. eCollection 2024.
The aim of the research was to demonstrate the efficiency of microorganisms and the effectiveness of biodegradation techniques on Low-density polyethylene (LDPE) plastics. The research question was: What is the efficiency of -degrading microorganisms and the effectiveness of biodegradation techniques?
The systematic review was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Articles were obtained from Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), Embase, and Google Scholar. The DeCS/Mesh search terms were: Low-density polyethylene, efficiency, biodegradation, microbial consortia, fungi, bacteria. Inclusion criteria were: scientific articles that included bacteria, fungi, and microbial consortia reported as degraders that report the percentage of weight loss; articles published from January 2010 to October 2022, and publications in Spanish and English with open access. Exclusion criteria were: studies that do not report gravimetry, the biodegradation time of , and the genus or species of the polyethylene-degrading microorganism.
Out of 483 studies found, 50 were included in this Systematic Review (SR). The most frequent study techniques were scanning electron microscopy (SEM), gravimetry, and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and in the case of microorganisms, the most studied belonged to the genus Pseudomonas, Bacillus, and Aspergillus. Regarding the isolation place, the most frequent mentioned in the reviewed articles were landfill soil and sanitary landfill soil. The efficiency of -degrading microorganisms was higher in bacteria such as , , , , and , which obtained a range of DE of 9.00-70.00%, 24.00-64%, 1.15 - 61.00%, 45.00%, and 1.5-40% with DT of 4-150, 120, 4-150, 30, and 30-120 days, respectively; in the case of fungi, the main microorganisms are , , and with efficiencies of 54.34, 48.78, and 46.34%, in 90 days, respectively; and the most efficient microbial consortia were from and with 38.00 - 81.00%, in 120 days; and, , , and with 55. 00 - 75.00% in 120 days.
The most efficient microorganisms in degradation are , , , , and ; in fungi , , and ; and in microbial consortia, those formed by and , and that of , , and ; and the most effective techniques used in biodegradation are SEM, gravimetry, and FTIR.
本研究的目的是证明微生物对低密度聚乙烯(LDPE)塑料的降解效率以及生物降解技术的有效性。研究问题是:降解微生物的效率和生物降解技术的有效性如何?
本系统评价基于系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明。文章来源于Scopus、科学网(WOS)、Embase和谷歌学术。医学主题词/医学主题词表(DeCS/Mesh)检索词为:低密度聚乙烯、效率、生物降解、微生物群落、真菌、细菌。纳入标准为:包含细菌、真菌和微生物群落作为降解剂且报告了失重百分比的科学文章;2010年1月至2022年10月发表的文章,以及西班牙语和英语的开放获取出版物。排除标准为:未报告重量法、聚乙烯降解时间以及聚乙烯降解微生物的属或种的研究。
在检索到的483项研究中,有50项被纳入本系统评价(SR)。最常用的研究技术是扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、重量法和傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR),就微生物而言,研究最多的属于假单胞菌属、芽孢杆菌属和曲霉属。关于分离地点,综述文章中最常提到的是垃圾填埋场土壤和卫生填埋场土壤。在细菌如[具体细菌名称1]、[具体细菌名称2]、[具体细菌名称3]、[具体细菌名称4]和[具体细菌名称5]中,聚乙烯降解微生物的效率较高,其降解效率(DE)范围分别为9.00 - 70.00%、24.00 - 64%、1.15 - 61.00%、45.00%和1.5 - 40%,降解时间(DT)分别为4 - 150天、120天、4 - 150天、30天和30 - 120天;对于真菌,主要微生物是[具体真菌名称1]、[具体真菌名称2]和[具体真菌名称3],在90天内的效率分别为54.34%、48.78%和46.34%;最有效的微生物群落来自[具体群落名称1]和[具体群落名称2],在120天内效率为38.00 - 81.00%;以及[具体群落名称3]、[具体群落名称4]、[具体群落名称5]和[具体群落名称6],在120天内效率为55.00 - 75.00%。
在聚乙烯降解中最有效的微生物是[具体细菌名称1]、[具体细菌名称2]、[具体细菌名称3]、[具体细菌名称4]和[具体细菌名称5];真菌方面是[具体真菌名称1]、[具体真菌名称2]和[具体真菌名称3];微生物群落方面是由[具体群落名称1]和[具体群落名称2]组成的群落,以及[具体群落名称3]、[具体群落名称4]、[具体群落名称5]和[具体群落名称6]组成的群落;在聚乙烯生物降解中使用的最有效技术是SEM、重量法和FTIR。