Mahdavi Neda, Tapak Leili, Darvishi Ebrahim, Doosti-Irani Amin, Shafiee Motlagh Masoud
Department of Ergonomics, Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Center of Excellence for Occupational Health, Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 65175-4171, Hamadan, Iran.
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 1;14(1):17866. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68889-4.
Recently, cognitive demands in workplaces have surged significantly. This study explored the intricate relationship among mental workload (MWL), occupational fatigue, physiological responses, and cognitive performance in office workers by using collective semi-parametric models. One hundred office workers were selected from twenty offices involved in cognitive performance. MWL was assessed through the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), and occupational fatigue was measured using the Persian version of the Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory. Physiological responses, including respiratory rate, the electrical conductivity of the skin (ECS), Heart Rate (HR), and other heart-related parameters, were recorded from the participants during a work shift. Selective and Divided Attention tests were chosen to evaluate workers' cognitive function based on cognitive task analysis. The mean of MWL and occupational fatigue scores were 66.28 ± 11.76 and 1.62 ± 1.07, respectively. There was a significant moderate correlation between two dimensions, mental demand (0.429) and frustration (0.409), with functional fatigue. Also, Significant and, of course, nonlinear relationships were observed between MWL and HR (R = 0.44, P-value < 0.001) and ECS (R = 0.45, P-value < 0.001) and reaction time in selected (R = 0.34, P-value < 0.001) and divided test (R = 0.48, P-value < 0.001). Similarly, nonlinear relationships were observed between physiological responses and cognitive performance with fatigue among participants who had experienced higher levels of occupational fatigue. The MWL and fatigue seem to have a significant and non-linear effect on physiological parameters such as HR and ECS and cognitive parameters such as reaction time. Moreover, MWL can influence the dimension of functional fatigue of workers.
最近,工作场所的认知需求显著激增。本研究通过使用集体半参数模型,探讨了办公室职员的心理负荷(MWL)、职业疲劳、生理反应和认知表现之间的复杂关系。从20个涉及认知表现的办公室中选取了100名办公室职员。MWL通过NASA任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)进行评估,职业疲劳使用瑞典职业疲劳量表的波斯语版本进行测量。在一个工作班次期间,记录了参与者的生理反应,包括呼吸频率、皮肤电导率(ECS)、心率(HR)以及其他与心脏相关的参数。基于认知任务分析,选择选择性注意力和分散注意力测试来评估员工的认知功能。MWL和职业疲劳得分的平均值分别为66.28±11.76和1.62±1.07。在心理需求(0.429)和挫折感(0.409)这两个维度与功能性疲劳之间存在显著的中度相关性。此外,在MWL与HR(R = 0.44,P值<0.001)、ECS(R = 0.45,P值<0.001)以及选择测试中的反应时间(R = 0.34,P值<0.001)和分散测试中的反应时间(R = 0.48,P值<0.001)之间观察到显著且当然是非线性的关系。同样,在经历较高职业疲劳水平的参与者中,观察到生理反应和认知表现与疲劳之间存在非线性关系。MWL和疲劳似乎对诸如HR和ECS等生理参数以及诸如反应时间等认知参数具有显著的非线性影响。此外,MWL会影响员工功能性疲劳的维度。