Center for Demography of Health and Aging, La Follette School of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
Behav Brain Sci. 2023 Sep 11;46:e213. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22002461.
This commentary seeks to briefly outline a clear-eyed middle ground between Burt's claims that the inclusion of polygenic scores (PGSs) is essentially useless for social science and proponents' vast overstatements and over-interpretations of these scores. Current practice of including PGSs in social science is often wrong but sometimes useful.
本评论旨在简要勾勒出 Burt 声称多基因评分（PGS）对于社会科学基本无用和支持者对这些评分的过分夸大和过度解读之间的明确中间立场。目前在社会科学中纳入 PGS 的做法常常是错误的，但有时也可能是有用的。
