• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过土地利用模型确定资源节约型和低碳农业发展路径。

Identifying resource-conscious and low-carbon agricultural development pathways through land use modelling.

作者信息

Deo Aniket, Shirsath Paresh B, Aggarwal Pramod K

机构信息

Borlaug Institute for South Asia (BISA), International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), New Delhi 1100012, India.

出版信息

Land use policy. 2024 Aug;143:107208. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107208.

DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107208
PMID:39092197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11203394/
Abstract

Increasing agricultural production with current resources and technology may lead to increased GHG emissions. Additionally, large population countries like India face substantial challenges in terms of food demand, agro-ecological heterogeneity, carbon footprint and depleting natural resources, thus increasing the decision complexities for policymakers and planners. We aim to examine the potential of producing more food from available agricultural land with low-carbon (reduced GHG emissions) and resource-conscious (optimal resource use) options. The current study develops multiple calorie production and emission-centric land use using a land use optimization model wherein the calorie production and emission objective, resource and emissions constraints, and food production targets interact across multiple spatial levels. The capabilities of the developed model are demonstrated with a case study in India targeting ten crops (grown over two seasons) covering three food groups (cereals, legumes, and oilseeds). Three hypothetical scenarios for each objective of maximizing calories production (, , ) and minimizing GHG emissions (, , ) are developed concerning targets of national crop production (, ), state food groups production (, ), and state crop production(, ), with different spatial levels of constraints. A maximum growth of 11% in calorie production is observed in while mitigating 2.5% emissions. Besides, the highest emission reduction of around 30% is observed in but with no change in calorie production. Emission scenarios can spare up to 14.8% land and 18.2% water, while calorie production-maximization scenarios can spare a maximum of 4.7% land and 6.5% water. The optimization-based methodology identifies the regions of altered land use by proposing appropriate crop substitution strategies, such as increasing oilseeds in Rajasthan and soybean in east Maharashtra. Many states show conservative production growth and emission reduction with state-level crop production targets (), suggesting crop redistribution within the state alone will not be sufficient unless improved technologies are introduced. The maximum growth and mitigation potential estimated in this study may be affected by climate shocks; therefore, introducing the improved technologies needs to be coupled with a crop redistribution mechanism to design climate-resilient and futuristic land use systems. The proposed land use model can be modified to incorporate climate change effects through consideration of scenarios of changed crop yields or through direct/indirect coupling with dynamic crop simulation models.

摘要

利用现有资源和技术增加农业产量可能会导致温室气体排放量增加。此外,像印度这样的人口大国在粮食需求、农业生态异质性、碳足迹和自然资源枯竭方面面临巨大挑战,这增加了政策制定者和规划者决策的复杂性。我们旨在研究通过低碳(减少温室气体排放)和资源节约型(优化资源利用)方案从现有农业用地生产更多粮食的潜力。当前研究使用土地利用优化模型开发了多种以卡路里产量和排放为中心的土地利用方式,其中卡路里产量和排放目标、资源和排放约束以及粮食生产目标在多个空间层面相互作用。通过针对印度的一个案例研究展示了所开发模型的能力,该案例研究针对十种作物(分两季种植),涵盖三个食物类别(谷物、豆类和油籽)。针对国家作物产量( , )、邦食物类别产量( , )和邦作物产量( , )目标,在不同空间约束水平下,针对卡路里产量最大化( , , )和温室气体排放最小化( , , )的每个目标制定了三种假设情景。在情景 中观察到卡路里产量最大增长11%,同时减排2.5%。此外,在情景 中观察到最高减排约30%,但卡路里产量没有变化。排放情景最多可节省14.8%的土地和18.2%的水,而卡路里产量最大化情景最多可节省4.7%的土地和6.5%的水。基于优化的方法通过提出适当的作物替代策略,如在拉贾斯坦邦增加油籽种植和在马哈拉施特拉邦东部增加大豆种植,确定了土地利用变化的区域。许多邦在邦级作物产量目标( )下显示出保守的产量增长和减排,这表明仅在邦内进行作物重新分配是不够的,除非引入改进技术。本研究估计的最大增长和减排潜力可能会受到气候冲击的影响;因此,引入改进技术需要与作物重新分配机制相结合,以设计具有气候适应能力和未来性的土地利用系统。所提出的土地利用模型可以通过考虑作物产量变化情景或通过与动态作物模拟模型直接/间接耦合来纳入气候变化影响进行修改。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5d/11203394/61e2673686b2/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5d/11203394/e8d67f5db6ac/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5d/11203394/e7fb885242af/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5d/11203394/adc8181a9382/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5d/11203394/60b3749e86c3/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5d/11203394/d8277051da0e/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5d/11203394/61e2673686b2/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5d/11203394/e8d67f5db6ac/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5d/11203394/e7fb885242af/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5d/11203394/adc8181a9382/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5d/11203394/60b3749e86c3/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5d/11203394/d8277051da0e/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5d/11203394/61e2673686b2/gr6.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying resource-conscious and low-carbon agricultural development pathways through land use modelling.通过土地利用模型确定资源节约型和低碳农业发展路径。
Land use policy. 2024 Aug;143:107208. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107208.
2
Food systems in a zero-deforestation world: Dietary change is more important than intensification for climate targets in 2050.在零毁林世界中的食物系统:对于 2050 年的气候目标而言,饮食改变比集约化更为重要。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Sep 15;735:139353. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139353. Epub 2020 May 12.
3
Use of modelling tools to assess climate change impacts on smallholder oil seed yields in South Africa.利用建模工具评估气候变化对南非小农户油籽产量的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 May 7;19(5):e0301254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301254. eCollection 2024.
4
Landscape patterns of bioenergy in a changing climate: implications for crop allocation and land-use competition.气候变化下生物能源的景观格局:对作物分配和土地利用竞争的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2016 Mar;26(2):515-29. doi: 10.1890/15-0545.
5
Does no-till crop management mitigate gaseous emissions and reduce yield disparities: An empirical US-China evaluation.免耕作物管理是否能减轻气体排放并减少产量差距:美中实证评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Mar 20;917:170310. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170310. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
6
Closing Yield Gaps: How Sustainable Can We Be?缩小产量差距:我们能有多可持续?
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 17;10(6):e0129487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129487. eCollection 2015.
7
Development of an assessment-based planting structure optimization model for mitigating agricultural greenhouse gas emissions.基于评估的种植结构优化模型的开发,以减轻农业温室气体排放。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jan 1;349:119322. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119322. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
8
Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from direct land use change due to crop production in multiple countries.估算多个国家因作物生产导致的土地利用变化直接产生的温室气体排放量。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 10;755(Pt 2):143338. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143338. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
9
Potential greenhouse gas reductions from Natural Climate Solutions in Oregon, USA.美国俄勒冈州自然气候解决方案的温室气体减排潜力。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 10;15(4):e0230424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230424. eCollection 2020.
10
Defining national biogenic methane targets: Implications for national food production & climate neutrality objectives.定义国家生物甲烷目标:对国家粮食生产和气候中性目标的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Oct 1;295:113058. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113058. Epub 2021 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Beyond the Farm to Fork Strategy: Methodology for designing a European agro-ecological future.超越从农场到餐桌战略:设计欧洲农业生态未来的方法。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 15;908:168160. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168160. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
2
Effects of land-use change on carbon emission and its driving factors in Shaanxi Province from 2000 to 2020.2000-2020 年陕西省土地利用变化对碳排放的影响及其驱动因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(26):68313-68326. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27110-1. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
3
Integrating crop redistribution and improved management towards meeting China's food demand with lower environmental costs.
通过作物重新分配和改进管理来满足中国的粮食需求,同时降低环境成本。
Nat Food. 2022 Dec;3(12):1031-1039. doi: 10.1038/s43016-022-00646-0. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
4
Crop harvests for direct food use insufficient to meet the UN's food security goal.直接食用的农作物收成不足以满足联合国的粮食安全目标。
Nat Food. 2022 May;3(5):367-374. doi: 10.1038/s43016-022-00504-z. Epub 2022 May 12.
5
Solving groundwater depletion in India while achieving food security.解决印度地下水枯竭问题,同时实现粮食安全。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 13;13(1):3374. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31122-9.
6
Global cropland could be almost halved: Assessment of land saving potentials under different strategies and implications for agricultural markets.全球耕地面积可能减少近一半:不同策略下的耕地节约潜力评估及其对农业市场的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 22;17(2):e0263063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263063. eCollection 2022.
7
Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality.实现碳中和的技术与展望。
Innovation (Camb). 2021 Oct 30;2(4):100180. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100180. eCollection 2021 Nov 28.
8
Land-based measures to mitigate climate change: Potential and feasibility by country.陆基措施减缓气候变化:按国家划分的潜力和可行性。
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Dec;27(23):6025-6058. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15873. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
9
Assessing the sustainability of post-Green Revolution cereals in India.评估印度绿色革命后谷物的可持续性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 10;116(50):25034-25041. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910935116. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
10
Cost-effective opportunities for climate change mitigation in Indian agriculture.印度农业应对气候变化的具有成本效益的缓解机会。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 10;655:1342-1354. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.225. Epub 2018 Nov 20.