• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在零毁林世界中的食物系统:对于 2050 年的气候目标而言,饮食改变比集约化更为重要。

Food systems in a zero-deforestation world: Dietary change is more important than intensification for climate targets in 2050.

机构信息

Institute of Social Ecology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Schottenfeldgasse 29, A-1070 Vienna, Austria,.

Institute of Social Ecology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Schottenfeldgasse 29, A-1070 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2020 Sep 15;735:139353. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139353. Epub 2020 May 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139353
PMID:32474248
Abstract

Global food systems contribute to climate change, the transgression of planetary boundaries and deforestation. An improved understanding of the environmental impacts of different food system futures is crucial for forging strategies to sustainably nourish a growing world population. We here quantify the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of global food system scenarios within a biophysically feasible "option space" in 2050 comprising all scenarios in which biomass supply - calculated as function of agricultural area and yields - is sufficient to cover biomass demand - derived from human diets and the feed demand of livestock. We assessed the biophysical feasibility of 520 scenarios in a hypothetical no-deforestation world. For all feasible scenarios, we calculate (in) direct GHG emissions related to agriculture. We also include (possibly negative) GHG emissions from land-use change, including changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) and carbon sinks from vegetation regrowth on land spared from food production. We identify 313 of 520 scenarios as feasible. Agricultural GHG emissions (excluding land use change) of feasible scenarios range from 1.7 to 12.5 Gt COe yr. When including changes in SOC and vegetation regrowth on spare land, the range is between -10.7 and 12.5 Gt COe yr. Our results show that diets are the main determinant of GHG emissions, with highest GHG emissions found for scenarios including high meat demand, especially if focused on ruminant meat and milk, and lowest emissions for scenarios with vegan diets. Contrary to frequent claims, our results indicate that diets and the composition and quantity of livestock feed, not crop yields, are the strongest determinants of GHG emissions from food-systems when existing forests are to be protected.

摘要

全球粮食系统是造成气候变化、超越地球生态边界和森林砍伐的主要原因之一。深入了解不同粮食系统未来的环境影响,对于制定可持续养活全球不断增长人口的战略至关重要。本研究在 2050 年包含所有生物物理可行的“选项空间”内,量化了全球粮食系统情景的温室气体(GHG)排放,其中生物质供应(根据农业面积和产量计算)足以满足生物质需求(来自人类饮食和牲畜饲料需求)。我们评估了假设没有森林砍伐的世界中 520 个情景的生物物理可行性。对于所有可行的情景,我们计算了(直接)与农业相关的 GHG 排放。我们还包括了土地利用变化(包括土壤有机碳(SOC)和因避免粮食生产而在土地上植被再生带来的碳汇)的(可能为负的)GHG 排放。我们确定了 520 个情景中的 313 个是可行的。可行情景的农业 GHG 排放(不包括土地利用变化)范围为 1.7 至 12.5 Gt COe yr。当包括 SOC 和闲置土地上植被再生的变化时,范围在-10.7 至 12.5 Gt COe yr 之间。研究结果表明,饮食是 GHG 排放的主要决定因素,其中包括高肉类需求的情景的 GHG 排放最高,特别是如果重点是反刍动物肉类和牛奶,而以素食为主的情景的 GHG 排放最低。与频繁的说法相反,我们的研究结果表明,当现有森林得到保护时,饮食以及牲畜饲料的组成和数量,而不是作物产量,是粮食系统 GHG 排放的最强决定因素。

相似文献

1
Food systems in a zero-deforestation world: Dietary change is more important than intensification for climate targets in 2050.在零毁林世界中的食物系统:对于 2050 年的气候目标而言,饮食改变比集约化更为重要。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Sep 15;735:139353. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139353. Epub 2020 May 12.
2
Intensification of dairy production can increase the GHG mitigation potential of the land use sector in East Africa.加强奶制品生产可以增加东非土地利用部门的温室气体减排潜力。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Feb;26(2):568-585. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14870. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
3
Climate mitigation by dairy intensification depends on intensive use of spared grassland.通过提高奶牛养殖密度来减少温室气体排放取决于对剩余草地的集约化利用。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Feb;24(2):681-693. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13868. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
4
Impacts of intensifying or expanding cereal cropping in sub-Saharan Africa on greenhouse gas emissions and food security.加强或扩大撒哈拉以南非洲地区谷物种植对温室气体排放和粮食安全的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Nov;25(11):3720-3730. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14783. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
5
Potential greenhouse gas reductions from Natural Climate Solutions in Oregon, USA.美国俄勒冈州自然气候解决方案的温室气体减排潜力。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 10;15(4):e0230424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230424. eCollection 2020.
6
Simulating soil C dynamics under intensive agricultural systems and climate change scenarios in the Matopiba region, Brazil.在巴西马托皮巴地区,模拟集约化农业系统和气候变化情景下的土壤 C 动态。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Dec 1;347:119149. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119149. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
7
Galyean appreciation club review: a holistic perspective of the societal relevance of beef production and its impacts on climate change.加利恩欣赏俱乐部评论:从整体角度看待牛肉生产的社会相关性及其对气候变化的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad024.
8
Environmental impacts of eco-nutrition swine feeding programs in spatially explicit geographic regions of the United States.美国空间明确地理区域内生态营养猪饲养方案的环境影响。
J Anim Sci. 2022 Dec 1;100(12). doi: 10.1093/jas/skac356.
9
Pressure on Global Forests: Implications of Rising Vegetable Oils Consumption Under the EAT-Lancet Diet.全球森林面临的压力:EAT-柳叶刀饮食模式下植物油消费上升的影响
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 Feb;31(2):e70077. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70077.
10
Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Agriculture: Pathways to Sustainable Reductions.农业领域的全球温室气体排放:可持续减排途径
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 Jan;31(1):e70015. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70015.

引用本文的文献

1
CO2 removal to reach net zero warming of global methane and nitrous oxide emissions of livestock: Comparison of two metrics under different 2050 FAO scenarios.去除二氧化碳以实现家畜全球甲烷和一氧化二氮排放的净零变暖:2050年粮农组织不同情景下两种指标的比较。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 18;20(8):e0330379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330379. eCollection 2025.
2
Decreasing the carbon footprint of food through public procurement-A case study from the municipality of Härnösand.通过公共采购减少食品的碳足迹——来自于哈诺桑德市的案例研究
Front Nutr. 2024 Nov 6;11:1330892. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1330892. eCollection 2024.
3
What do Climate Change, Nutrition, and the Environment Have to do With Mental Health?
气候变化、营养与环境和心理健康有何关联?
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024 Sep 3:15598276241280245. doi: 10.1177/15598276241280245.
4
Challenges beyond reaching a 30% of area protection.超出实现30%区域保护目标的挑战。
NPJ Biodivers. 2024 May 2;3(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s44185-024-00041-x.
5
Analysis of food system drivers of deforestation highlights foreign direct investments and urbanization as threats to tropical forests.分析导致森林砍伐的食物系统驱动因素表明,外国直接投资和城市化是热带森林面临的威胁。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 16;14(1):15179. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65397-3.
6
Improving Human Diets and Welfare through Using Herbivore-Based Foods: 1. Human and Animal Perspectives.通过食用草食动物类食物改善人类饮食与福祉:1. 人类与动物视角
Animals (Basel). 2024 Apr 2;14(7):1077. doi: 10.3390/ani14071077.
7
Feeding climate and biodiversity goals with novel plant-based meat and milk alternatives.用新型植物性肉类和奶类替代品满足饮食与气候和生物多样性目标。
Nat Commun. 2023 Sep 12;14(1):5316. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40899-2.
8
Understanding the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on sustainable agri-food system and agroecosystem decarbonization nexus: A review.了解新冠疫情对可持续农业食品系统与农业生态系统脱碳关系的影响:一项综述
J Clean Prod. 2021 Oct 10;318:128451. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128451. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
9
A framework for application of consumer neuroscience in pro-environmental behavior change interventions.消费者神经科学在促进环境行为改变干预中的应用框架。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Sep 15;16:886600. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.886600. eCollection 2022.
10
Forest Transitions in the United States, France and Austria: dynamics of forest change and their socio- metabolic drivers.美国、法国和奥地利的森林转型:森林变化动态及其社会代谢驱动因素
J Land Use Sci. 2022 Jan 5;17(1):113-133. doi: 10.1080/1747423X.2021.2018514. eCollection 2022.