Suppr超能文献

矿物三氧化物凝聚体与细菌纤维素纳米晶体增强矿物三氧化物凝聚体的力学和物理性能比较评估:一项体外研究

Comparative Evaluation of the Mechanical and Physical Properties of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate vs. Bacterial Cellulose Nanocrystal-Reinforced Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: An In Vitro Study.

作者信息

V Lalitha Priya, Ramar Kavitha

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jul 1;16(7):e63632. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63632. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Abstract

AIM

This study aims to compare and assess the compression strength, microhardness, and surface texture of two sets of materials: mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Plus and bacterial cellulose nanocrystal (BCNC)-reinforced MTA Plus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

According to the ASTM E384 standard, the cylindrical molds made of plexiglass with an internal diameter of 6 mm and a height of 4 mm were fabricated using computer numerical control laser cutting. A total of 20 samples (n=10) in each group were considered in this experimental study: Group I (control group) MTA Plus (Prevest DenPro Limited, India) and Group II (experimental group) BCNC (Vedayukt India Private Limited, India)-reinforced MTA Plus. After preparation, the molds were incubated at 37°C in a fully saturated condition for about 24 hours, and then the compression strength, microhardness, and scanning electron microscopy analyses were performed at different magnifications. The obtained data were then statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Quantitative analysis revealed that there is a statistically significant difference between MTA Plus and BCNC-reinforced MTA Plus (p<0.002). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann-Whitney U-test revealed that BCNC-reinforced MTA Plus showed significantly higher compression strength (33.80±3.83 MPa, p=0.00) and surface microhardness (642.85±24.00 μm, p=0.00) than the control group.

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, it was concluded that there is a statistically significant difference between both study groups. Thus, incorporating BCNC into the MTA Plus significantly increased the compression strength and surface microhardness of the MTA Plus cement.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Numerous dental applications have been investigated for bacterial cellulose. Many benefits of bacterial cellulose are available, which include its effects on moldability, low cost, high water retention capacity, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. Furthermore, the addition of BCNC to MTA Plus accelerates the material's hardening process and decreases its setting time, which in turn shortens clinical chairside procedural timing and thereby improves patient satisfaction.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较和评估两组材料的抗压强度、显微硬度和表面纹理:三氧化矿物凝聚体(MTA)Plus和细菌纤维素纳米晶体(BCNC)增强的MTA Plus。

材料与方法

根据ASTM E384标准,使用计算机数控激光切割制作内径为6mm、高度为4mm的有机玻璃圆柱形模具。本实验研究每组共考虑20个样本(n = 10):第一组(对照组)为MTA Plus(印度Prevest DenPro有限公司),第二组(实验组)为BCNC(印度Vedayukt印度私人有限公司)增强的MTA Plus。制备后,将模具在37°C下完全饱和状态下孵育约24小时,然后在不同放大倍数下进行抗压强度、显微硬度和扫描电子显微镜分析。然后对获得的数据进行统计分析。

结果

定量分析显示,MTA Plus和BCNC增强的MTA Plus之间存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.002)。Wilcoxon符号秩检验和Mann-Whitney U检验显示,BCNC增强的MTA Plus的抗压强度(33.80±3.83MPa,p = 0.00)和表面显微硬度(642.85±24.00μm,p = 0.00)明显高于对照组。

结论

根据我们的研究结果,得出结论:两个研究组之间存在统计学显著差异。因此,将BCNC掺入MTA Plus可显著提高MTA Plus水泥的抗压强度和表面显微硬度。

临床意义

已经对细菌纤维素进行了许多牙科应用研究。细菌纤维素有许多优点,包括其对可塑性的影响、低成本、高保水能力、生物相容性和生物降解性。此外,向MTA Plus中添加BCNC可加速材料的硬化过程并缩短其凝固时间,从而缩短临床椅旁操作时间,进而提高患者满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbd/11291990/fadba50fa97f/cureus-0016-00000063632-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验