• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

crossnma:一个使用网络荟萃分析和网络荟萃回归综合交叉设计证据和交叉格式数据的 R 包。

crossnma: An R package to synthesize cross-design evidence and cross-format data using network meta-analysis and network meta-regression.

机构信息

Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02130-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-023-02130-0
PMID:39103781
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11299362/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although aggregate data (AD) from randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are used in the majority of network meta-analyses (NMAs), other study designs (e.g., cohort studies and other non-randomised studies, NRS) can be informative about relative treatment effects. The individual participant data (IPD) of the study, when available, are preferred to AD for adjusting for important participant characteristics and to better handle heterogeneity and inconsistency in the network.

RESULTS

We developed the R package crossnma to perform cross-format (IPD and AD) and cross-design (RCT and NRS) NMA and network meta-regression (NMR). The models are implemented as Bayesian three-level hierarchical models using Just Another Gibbs Sampler (JAGS) software within the R environment. The R package crossnma includes functions to automatically create the JAGS model, reformat the data (based on user input), assess convergence and summarize the results. We demonstrate the workflow within crossnma by using a network of six trials comparing four treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

The R package crossnma enables the user to perform NMA and NMR with different data types in a Bayesian framework and facilitates the inclusion of all types of evidence recognising differences in risk of bias.

摘要

背景

尽管多数网络荟萃分析(NMA)使用的是来自随机对照试验(RCT)的汇总数据(AD),但其他研究设计(如队列研究和其他非随机研究,NRS)也可以提供有关相对治疗效果的信息。当研究有个体参与者数据(IPD)时,这些数据比 AD 更优,因为其可用于调整重要的参与者特征,并更好地处理网络中的异质性和不一致性。

结果

我们开发了 R 包 crossnma,用于执行跨格式(IPD 和 AD)和跨设计(RCT 和 NRS)的 NMA 和网络荟萃回归(NMR)。这些模型是作为使用 R 环境中的 Just Another Gibbs Sampler(JAGS)软件的贝叶斯三层层次模型来实现的。crossnma R 包包含了用于自动创建 JAGS 模型、重新格式化数据(基于用户输入)、评估收敛和总结结果的功能。我们通过使用比较四种治疗方法的六个试验的网络来演示 crossnma 中的工作流程。

结论

R 包 crossnma 允许用户在贝叶斯框架中使用不同类型的数据进行 NMA 和 NMR,并促进包括所有类型的证据,承认偏倚风险的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f96/11299362/0b98ff95ca4a/12874_2023_2130_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f96/11299362/b7f19da826d5/12874_2023_2130_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f96/11299362/cfbf4e1027cc/12874_2023_2130_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f96/11299362/ed183a85d1b2/12874_2023_2130_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f96/11299362/dbbc4f0fd829/12874_2023_2130_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f96/11299362/0b98ff95ca4a/12874_2023_2130_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f96/11299362/b7f19da826d5/12874_2023_2130_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f96/11299362/cfbf4e1027cc/12874_2023_2130_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f96/11299362/ed183a85d1b2/12874_2023_2130_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f96/11299362/dbbc4f0fd829/12874_2023_2130_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f96/11299362/0b98ff95ca4a/12874_2023_2130_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
crossnma: An R package to synthesize cross-design evidence and cross-format data using network meta-analysis and network meta-regression.crossnma:一个使用网络荟萃分析和网络荟萃回归综合交叉设计证据和交叉格式数据的 R 包。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02130-0.
2
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
3
Effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for severe agitation in real-world emergency settings: protocol of individual-participant-data network meta-analysis.真实世界急诊环境中重度激越的药物治疗效果:个体参与者数据网络荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 2;13(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02623-z.
4
The use of telemedicine services for medical abortion.远程医疗服务在药物流产中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 4;6(6):CD013764. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013764.pub2.
5
When does the use of individual patient data in network meta-analysis make a difference? A simulation study.网络荟萃分析中使用个体患者数据何时会产生影响?一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jan 13;21(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01198-2.
6
Effectiveness of different pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions on preventing coughing during extubation: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同药理学或非药理学干预措施预防拔管期咳嗽的效果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 20;14(11):e081592. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081592.
7
Anti-VEGF drugs compared with laser photocoagulation for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.抗血管内皮生长因子药物与激光光凝术治疗增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变的比较:一项系统评价和个体参与者数据荟萃分析
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Apr 2:1-75. doi: 10.3310/MJYP6578.
8
Interventions for fertility preservation in women with cancer undergoing chemotherapy.对接受化疗的癌症女性进行生育力保存的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 19;6:CD012891. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012891.pub2.
9
Non-invasive brain stimulation for treatment-resistant schizophrenia: protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis.非侵入性脑刺激治疗抗药性精神分裂症:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 24;13(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02585-2.
10
Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.慢性化脓性中耳炎的耳道清理(耳部清洁)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013057.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Sexual dysfunction and other prolactin-related side effects of antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: Protocol for a systematic review with single-arm, pairwise, and network meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies.精神分裂症中抗精神病药物的性功能障碍及其他与催乳素相关的副作用:一项系统评价的方案,该评价采用随机对照试验和非随机研究的单臂、成对及网状荟萃分析
F1000Res. 2025 Feb 11;13:973. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.154742.2. eCollection 2024.
2
Protein-truncating variant in APOL3 increases chronic kidney disease risk in epistasis with APOL1 risk alleles.APOL3 蛋白截断变异与 APOL1 风险等位基因的共显性作用增加了慢性肾脏病的风险。
JCI Insight. 2024 Oct 8;9(19):e181238. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.181238.

本文引用的文献

1
Synthesizing cross-design evidence and cross-format data using network meta-regression.使用网络Meta回归综合交叉设计证据和交叉格式数据。
Res Synth Methods. 2023 Mar;14(2):283-300. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1619. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
2
The Impact of Industry Funding on Randomized Controlled Trials of Biologic Therapies.行业资金对生物疗法随机对照试验的影响。
Medicines (Basel). 2022 Feb 28;9(3):18. doi: 10.3390/medicines9030018.
3
A bias-corrected meta-analysis model for combining, studies of different types and quality.一种用于合并不同类型和质量研究的偏倚校正的荟萃分析模型。
Biom J. 2021 Feb;63(2):406-422. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201900376. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
4
Multilevel network meta-regression for population-adjusted treatment comparisons.用于人群调整治疗比较的多水平网络meta回归
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2020 Jun;183(3):1189-1210. doi: 10.1111/rssa.12579. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
5
In network meta-analysis, most of the information comes from indirect evidence: empirical study.在网络荟萃分析中,大部分信息来源于间接证据:实证研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;124:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
6
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.《可信系统评价的更新指南:干预措施系统评价的新版Cochrane手册》
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10(10):ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.
7
BUGSnet: an R package to facilitate the conduct and reporting of Bayesian network Meta-analyses.BUGSnet:一个 R 包,用于方便贝叶斯网络荟萃分析的实施和报告。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0829-2.
8
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
9
Characteristics and methods of incorporating randomized and nonrandomized evidence in network meta-analyses: a scoping review.将随机和非随机证据纳入网络荟萃分析的特点和方法:范围综述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Sep;113:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.023. Epub 2019 May 3.
10
Combining randomized and non-randomized evidence in network meta-analysis.在网状Meta分析中合并随机和非随机证据。
Stat Med. 2017 Apr 15;36(8):1210-1226. doi: 10.1002/sim.7223. Epub 2017 Jan 12.