Clinical Effectiveness Group, Centre for Primary Care, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
Integrated Care System, NHS North East London, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 6;14(8):e083497. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083497.
There are established inequities in the monitoring and management of hypertension in England. The COVID-19 pandemic had a major impact on primary care management of long-term conditions such as hypertension. This study investigated the possible disproportionate impact of the pandemic across patient groups.
Open cohort of people with diagnosed hypertension.
North East London primary care practices from January 2019 to October 2022.
All 224 329 adults with hypertension registered in 193 primary care practices.
Monitoring and management of hypertension were assessed using two indicators: (i) blood pressure recorded within 1 year of the index date and (ii) blood pressure control to national clinical practice guidelines.
The proportion of patients with a contemporaneous blood pressure recording fell from a 91% pre-pandemic peak to 62% at the end of the pandemic lockdown and improved to 77% by the end of the study. This was paralleled by the proportion of individuals with controlled hypertension which fell from a 73% pre-pandemic peak to 50% at the end of the pandemic lockdown and improved to 60% by the end of the study. However, when excluding patients without a recent blood pressure recording, the proportions of patients with controlled hypertension increased to 81%, 80% and 78% respectively.Throughout the study, in comparison to the White ethnic group, the Black ethnic group was less likely to achieve adequate blood pressure control (ORs 0.81 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.85, p<0.001) to 0.87 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.91, p<0.001)). Conversely, the Asian ethnic group was more likely to have controlled blood pressure (ORs 1.09 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.14, p<0.001) to 1.28 (95% CI 1.23 to 1.32, p<0.001)). Men, younger individuals, more affluent individuals, individuals with unknown or unrecorded ethnicity or those untreated were also less likely to have blood pressure control to target throughout the study.
The COVID-19 pandemic had a greater impact on blood pressure recording than on blood pressure control. Inequities in blood pressure control persisted during the pandemic and remain outstanding.
英格兰在高血压监测和管理方面存在既定的不平等现象。COVID-19 大流行对高血压等长期疾病的基层医疗管理产生了重大影响。本研究调查了大流行在各患者群体中可能产生的不成比例的影响。
确诊高血压患者的开放队列。
2019 年 1 月至 2022 年 10 月期间,来自英格兰东北部的基层医疗实践。
193 个基层医疗实践中登记的所有 224329 名高血压成年患者。
使用两个指标评估高血压的监测和管理:(i)在指数日期的 1 年内记录的血压和(ii)血压控制达到国家临床实践指南。
同期有血压记录的患者比例从大流行前的 91%峰值下降到大流行封锁结束时的 62%,并在研究结束时提高到 77%。这与血压控制率下降到大流行封锁结束时的 50%相平行,在研究结束时提高到 60%。然而,当排除最近没有血压记录的患者时,血压控制良好的患者比例分别上升至 81%、80%和 78%。在整个研究过程中,与白种人相比,黑人种族不太可能实现足够的血压控制(比值比 0.81(95%置信区间 0.78 至 0.85,p<0.001)至 0.87(95%置信区间 0.84 至 0.91,p<0.001))。相反,亚洲族裔群体更有可能控制血压(比值比 1.09(95%置信区间 1.05 至 1.14,p<0.001)至 1.28(95%置信区间 1.23 至 1.32,p<0.001))。在整个研究过程中,男性、年轻个体、较富裕的个体、未知或未记录种族的个体或未经治疗的个体也不太可能达到目标血压控制。
COVID-19 大流行对血压记录的影响大于对血压控制的影响。大流行期间,血压控制的不平等现象持续存在,仍然存在。