• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2006 - 2019年英国初级医疗中高血压管理、药物使用及血压控制方面的种族差异:一项回顾性队列研究

Ethnic differences in hypertension management, medication use and blood pressure control in UK primary care, 2006-2019: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Eastwood Sophie V, Hughes Alun D, Tomlinson Laurie, Mathur Rohini, Smeeth Liam, Bhaskaran Krishnan, Chaturvedi Nishi

机构信息

MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Aging at UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, Floor 5, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.

Electronic Health Records Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 2nd floor, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Dec 5;25:100557. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100557. eCollection 2023 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100557
PMID:36818236
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9929586/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the UK, previous work suggests ethnic inequalities in hypertension management. We studied ethnic differences in hypertension management and their contribution to blood pressure (BP) control.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study of antihypertensive-naïve individuals of European, South Asian and African/African Caribbean ethnicity with a new raised BP reading in UK primary care from 2006 to 2019, using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). We studied differences in: BP re-measurement after an initial hypertensive BP, antihypertensive initiation, BP monitoring, antihypertensive intensification, antihypertensive persistence/adherence and BP control one year after antihypertensive initiation. Models adjusted for socio-demographics, BP, comorbidity, healthcare usage and polypharmacy (plus antihypertensive class, BP monitoring, intensification, persistence and adherence for BP control models).

FINDINGS

A total of 731,506 (93.5%), 30,379 (3.9%) and 20,256 (2.6%) people of European, South Asian and African/African Caribbean ethnicity were studied. Hypertension management indicators were similar or more favourable for South Asian than European groups (OR/HR [95% CI] in fully-adjusted models of BP re-measurement: 1.16 [1.09, 1.24]), antihypertensive initiation: 1.49 [1.37, 1.62], BP monitoring: 0.97 [0.94, 1.00] and antihypertensive intensification: 1.10 [1.04, 1.16]). For people of African/African Caribbean ethnicity, BP re-measurement rates were similar to those of European ethnicity (0.98 [0.91, 1.05]), and antihypertensive initiation rates greater (1.48 [1.32, 1.66]), but BP monitoring (0.91 [0.87, 0.95]) and intensification rates lower (0.93 [0.87, 1.00]). Persistence and adherence were lower in South Asian (0.48 [0.45, 0.51] and 0.51 [0.47, 0.56]) and African/African Caribbean (0.38 [0.35, 0.42] and 0.39 [0.36, 0.43]) than European groups. BP control was similar in South Asian and less likely in African/African Caribbean than European groups (0.98 [0.90, 1.06] and 0.81 [0.74, 0.89] in age, gender and BP adjusted models). The latter difference attenuated after adjustment for persistence (0.91 [0.82, 0.99]) or adherence (0.92 [0.83, 1.01]), and was absent for antihypertensive-adherent people (0.99 [0.88, 1.10]).

INTERPRETATION

We demonstrate that antihypertensive initiation does not vary by ethnicity, but subsequent BP control was notably lower among people of African/African Caribbean ethnicity, potentially associated with being less likely to remain on regular treatment. A nationwide strategy to understand and address differences in ongoing management of people on antihypertensives is imperative.

FUNDING

Diabetes UK.

摘要

背景

在英国,先前的研究表明高血压管理存在种族不平等现象。我们研究了高血压管理中的种族差异及其对血压控制的影响。

方法

我们利用临床实践研究数据链(CPRD),对2006年至2019年在英国初级医疗中首次测量血压升高且未服用过抗高血压药物的欧洲、南亚和非洲/非洲加勒比裔个体进行了队列研究。我们研究了以下方面的差异:初次高血压血压测量后的血压复测、抗高血压药物起始治疗、血压监测、抗高血压药物强化治疗、抗高血压药物持续性/依从性以及抗高血压药物起始治疗一年后的血压控制情况。模型对社会人口统计学、血压、合并症、医疗保健使用情况和联合用药进行了调整(血压控制模型还对抗高血压药物类别、血压监测、强化治疗、持续性和依从性进行了调整)。

研究结果

共研究了731,506名(93.5%)欧洲裔、30,379名(3.9%)南亚裔和20,256名(2.6%)非洲/非洲加勒比裔个体。南亚人群的高血压管理指标与欧洲人群相似或更优(在完全调整模型中,血压复测的比值比/风险比[95%置信区间]:1.16[1.09, 1.24]),抗高血压药物起始治疗:1.49[1.37, 1.62],血压监测:0.97[0.94, 1.00],抗高血压药物强化治疗:1.10[1.04, 1.16])。对于非洲/非洲加勒比裔人群,血压复测率与欧洲裔人群相似(0.98[0.91, 1.05]),抗高血压药物起始治疗率更高(1.48[1.32, 1.66]),但血压监测率(0.91[0.87, 0.95])和强化治疗率较低(0.93[0.87, 1.00])。南亚裔(0.48[0.45, 0.51]和0.51[0.47, 0.56])和非洲/非洲加勒比裔(0.38[0.35, 0.42]和0.39[0.36, 0.43])的持续性和依从性低于欧洲裔人群。南亚裔和非洲/非洲加勒比裔的血压控制情况与欧洲裔人群相似,非洲/非洲加勒比裔的血压控制可能性低于欧洲裔人群(在年龄、性别和血压调整模型中分别为0.98[0.90, 1.06]和0.81[0.74, 0.89])。在调整持续性(0.91[0.82, 0.99])或依从性(0.92[0.83, 1.01])后,后一种差异有所减弱,而在坚持服用抗高血压药物的人群中则不存在这种差异(0.99[0.88, 1.10])。

解读

我们证明了抗高血压药物起始治疗不因种族而异,但非洲/非洲加勒比裔人群的后续血压控制明显较低,这可能与他们不太可能坚持常规治疗有关。制定一项全国性战略来了解和解决抗高血压药物治疗患者持续管理中的差异势在必行。

资助

英国糖尿病协会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2d/9929586/372641d57b8e/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2d/9929586/b0a0d8870cb3/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2d/9929586/6a7d5c90a18e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2d/9929586/372641d57b8e/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2d/9929586/b0a0d8870cb3/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2d/9929586/6a7d5c90a18e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2d/9929586/372641d57b8e/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Ethnic differences in hypertension management, medication use and blood pressure control in UK primary care, 2006-2019: a retrospective cohort study.2006 - 2019年英国初级医疗中高血压管理、药物使用及血压控制方面的种族差异:一项回顾性队列研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Dec 5;25:100557. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100557. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Ethnic differences in guideline-indicated statin initiation for people with type 2 diabetes in UK primary care, 2006-2019: A cohort study.2006-2019 年英国初级保健中 2 型糖尿病患者基于指南建议使用他汀类药物起始治疗的种族差异:一项队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2021 Jun 29;18(6):e1003672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003672. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Ethnic disparities in initiation and intensification of diabetes treatment in adults with type 2 diabetes in the UK, 1990-2017: A cohort study.英国 1990-2017 年 2 型糖尿病成人起始和强化糖尿病治疗中的种族差异:一项队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 May 15;17(5):e1003106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003106. eCollection 2020 May.
4
Ethnic and socioeconomic influences on childhood blood pressure: the Child Heart and Health Study in England.种族和社会经济因素对儿童血压的影响:英国儿童心脏与健康研究。
J Hypertens. 2012 Nov;30(11):2090-7. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835837c9.
5
Antihypertensive Medication Use and Its Effects on Blood Pressure and Haemodynamics in a Tri-ethnic Population Cohort: Southall and Brent Revisited (SABRE).三族裔人群队列中抗高血压药物的使用及其对血压和血流动力学的影响:再探索撒尔和布伦特(SABRE)
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 14;8:795267. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.795267. eCollection 2021.
6
Association of Differences in Treatment Intensification, Missed Visits, and Scheduled Follow-up Interval With Racial or Ethnic Disparities in Blood Pressure Control.治疗强化程度、就诊失约和规定随访间隔方面的差异与血压控制方面的种族或民族差异之间的关联。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Feb 1;7(2):204-212. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.4996.
7
Differences in the risk of cardiovascular disease across ethnic groups: UK Biobank observational study.不同种族群体心血管疾病风险的差异:英国生物银行观察性研究。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2022 Nov;32(11):2594-2602. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
8
Ethnic Differences in Associations Between Blood Pressure and Stroke in South Asian and European Men.南亚和欧洲男性血压与中风关联中的种族差异
Hypertension. 2015 Sep;66(3):481-8. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05672. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
9
Systematic review: antihypertensive drug therapy in patients of African and South Asian ethnicity.系统评价:非洲裔和南亚裔患者的抗高血压药物治疗
Intern Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;11(3):355-74. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1422-x. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
10
Ethnicity and differences between clinic and ambulatory blood pressure measurements.种族与诊室血压测量和动态血压测量之间的差异
Am J Hypertens. 2015 Jun;28(6):729-38. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu211. Epub 2014 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Cataloguing and evaluating Irish health data resources for primary care cancer research.对爱尔兰用于初级保健癌症研究的健康数据资源进行编目和评估。
BJC Rep. 2025 Sep 3;3(1):59. doi: 10.1038/s44276-025-00170-1.
2
COVID-19 pandemic impact on hypertension management in North East London: an observational cohort study using electronic health records.COVID-19 大流行对伦敦东北部高血压管理的影响:一项使用电子健康记录的观察性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 6;14(8):e083497. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083497.
3
Religious minority status and risk of hypertension in women: Evidence from Bangladesh.

本文引用的文献

1
Antihypertensive Medication Use and Its Effects on Blood Pressure and Haemodynamics in a Tri-ethnic Population Cohort: Southall and Brent Revisited (SABRE).三族裔人群队列中抗高血压药物的使用及其对血压和血流动力学的影响:再探索撒尔和布伦特(SABRE)
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 14;8:795267. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.795267. eCollection 2021.
2
Association of Differences in Treatment Intensification, Missed Visits, and Scheduled Follow-up Interval With Racial or Ethnic Disparities in Blood Pressure Control.治疗强化程度、就诊失约和规定随访间隔方面的差异与血压控制方面的种族或民族差异之间的关联。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Feb 1;7(2):204-212. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.4996.
3
宗教少数群体身份与女性患高血压的风险:来自孟加拉国的证据。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 22;10(13):e33428. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33428. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
4
Inequities in hypertension management: observational cross-sectional study in North East London using electronic health records.高血压管理中的不平等现象:使用电子健康记录的伦敦东北部观察性横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Oct 26;73(736):e798-e806. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0077. Print 2023 Nov.
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Hypertension Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control in the United States, 2013 to 2018.
美国 2013 至 2018 年高血压患病率、知晓率、治疗率和控制率的种族/民族差异。
Hypertension. 2021 Dec;78(6):1719-1726. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17570. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
4
Prevalence and determinants of hypertension control among almost 100 000 treated adults in the UK.英国近 10 万治疗成年人中高血压控制的流行率及其决定因素。
Open Heart. 2021 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001461.
5
Poor Medication Adherence in African Americans Is a Matter of Trust.非裔美国人的药物依从性差是一个信任问题。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021 Aug;8(4):927-942. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00850-3. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
6
Hypertension awareness, treatment and control among ethnic minority populations in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis.欧洲少数民族人群中的高血压知晓率、治疗率和控制率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Hypertens. 2021 Feb 1;39(2):202-213. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002651.
7
Is the rule of halves still relevant today? A cross-sectional analysis of hypertension detection, treatment and control in an urban community.如今,对半规则是否仍然适用?一项城市社区高血压检出、治疗和控制情况的横断面分析。
J Hypertens. 2019 Dec;37(12):2470-2480. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002192.
8
Factors associated with consultation rates in general practice in England, 2013-2014: a cross-sectional study.2013-2014 年英格兰普通实践中咨询率相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 May;68(670):e370-e377. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695981. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
9
Promises and pitfalls of electronic health record analysis.电子健康记录分析的承诺与陷阱。
Diabetologia. 2018 Jun;61(6):1241-1248. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4518-6. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
10
Medication adherence, medical record accuracy, and medication exposure in real-world patients using comprehensive medication monitoring.使用综合药物监测的真实世界患者的药物依从性、病历准确性和药物暴露情况。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 28;12(9):e0185471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185471. eCollection 2017.