• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施支持能力评估的制定与心理计量学评估。

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Implementation Support Competencies Assessment.

机构信息

School of Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2024 Aug 6;19(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01390-8.

DOI:10.1186/s13012-024-01390-8
PMID:39107794
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11304765/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implementation support practitioners (ISPs) are professionals that support others to implement evidence-informed practices, programs, and policies in various service delivery settings to achieve population outcomes. Measuring the use of competencies by ISPs provides a unique opportunity to assess an understudied facet of implementation science-how knowledge, attitudes, and skills used by ISPs affects sustainable change in complicated and complex service systems. This study describes the development and validation of a measure-the Implementation Support Competencies Assessment (ISCA)-that assesses implementation support competencies, with versatile applications across service contexts.

METHODS

Recently developed practice guide materials included operationalizations of core competencies for ISPs across three domains: co-creation and engagement, ongoing improvement, and sustaining change. These operationalizations, in combination with recent empirical and conceptual work, provided an initial item pool and foundation on which to advance measurement development, largely from a confirmatory perspective (as opposed to exploratory). The measure was further refined through modified cognitive interviewing with three highly experienced ISPs and pilot-testing with 39 individuals enrolled in a university-based certificate program in implementation practice. To recruit a sample for validation analyses, we leveraged a listserv of nearly 4,000 individuals who have registered for or expressed interest in various events and trainings focused on implementation practice offered by an implementation science collaborative housed within a research-intensive university in the Southeast region of the United States. Our final analytic sample included 357 participants who self-identified as ISPs.

RESULTS

Assessments of internal consistency reliability for each competency-specific item set yielded evidence of strong reliability. Results from confirmatory factor analyses provided evidence for the factorial and construct validity of all three domains and associated competencies in the ISCA.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that one's possession of high levels of competence across each of the three competency domains is strongly associated with theorized outcomes that can promote successful and sustainable implementation efforts among those who receive implementation support from an ISP. The ISCA serves as a foundational tool for workforce development to formally measure and assess improvement in the skills that are required to tailor a package of implementation strategies situated in context.

摘要

背景

实施支持从业者(ISP)是支持他人在各种服务提供环境中实施循证实践、计划和政策以实现人群结果的专业人员。衡量 ISP 能力的使用情况为评估实施科学的一个研究不足的方面提供了独特的机会,即 ISP 使用的知识、态度和技能如何影响复杂和复杂服务系统中的可持续变化。本研究描述了一种衡量实施支持能力评估(ISCA)的开发和验证,该评估衡量实施支持能力,在服务背景下具有多种应用。

方法

最近开发的实践指南材料包括三个领域的 ISP 核心能力的操作化:共同创造和参与、持续改进和维持变化。这些操作化,结合最近的实证和概念工作,提供了一个初始项目池和基础,主要从验证性的角度(而不是探索性的)来推进测量的发展。该措施通过与三位经验丰富的 ISP 进行修改后的认知访谈以及在 39 名参加大学实施实践证书课程的个人中进行试点测试进一步完善。为了招募验证分析的样本,我们利用了一个近 4000 人的名单,这些人已经注册或表示有兴趣参加由美国东南部一个研究密集型大学内的实施科学合作机构举办的各种实施实践相关的活动和培训。我们的最终分析样本包括 357 名自认为是 ISP 的参与者。

结果

对每个特定能力项目集的内部一致性可靠性评估提供了强有力的可靠性证据。验证性因素分析的结果为 ISCA 中所有三个领域和相关能力的因子和结构有效性提供了证据。

结论

这些发现表明,一个人在三个能力领域中都具有高水平的能力,这与从 ISP 获得实施支持的人成功和可持续实施努力的理论结果密切相关。ISCA 是劳动力发展的基础工具,可用于正式衡量和评估在背景中定制实施策略包所需技能的提高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d73/11304765/d98d114a2fc1/13012_2024_1390_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d73/11304765/286782aecf02/13012_2024_1390_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d73/11304765/d5d6e03f5c27/13012_2024_1390_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d73/11304765/d98d114a2fc1/13012_2024_1390_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d73/11304765/286782aecf02/13012_2024_1390_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d73/11304765/d5d6e03f5c27/13012_2024_1390_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d73/11304765/d98d114a2fc1/13012_2024_1390_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and psychometric evaluation of the Implementation Support Competencies Assessment.实施支持能力评估的制定与心理计量学评估。
Implement Sci. 2024 Aug 6;19(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01390-8.
2
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
3
Simplified Chinese Trauma Advanced Practice Nurses' Core Competency Scale: A development and psychometric validation study.简体中文创伤高级实践护士核心能力量表:编制与心理测量学验证研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Dec;143:106384. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106384. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
4
Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the French version of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork perceptions questionnaire.跨文化验证和心理计量测试法语版的团队 STEPPS 团队工作感知问卷。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Aug 29;38(6):923-941. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2023-0004.
5
Development of the Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Competencies Scale: An Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis.急性护理从业者能力量表的开发:探索性和验证性因子分析。
J Nurs Res. 2023 Jun 1;31(3):e276. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000551.
6
Development and psychometric testing of the nurses' core competencies for public health emergencies scale: A multicenter cross-sectional study.突发公共卫生事件中护士核心能力量表的编制及信效度检验:多中心横断面研究
Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Dec;143:106383. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106383. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
7
Questionnaire to Evaluate the Competency in Evidence-Based Practice of Registered Nurses (EBP-COQ Prof©): Development and Psychometric Validation.评估注册护士循证实践能力的问卷 (EBP-COQ Prof©):开发与心理测量学验证。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Oct;17(5):366-375. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12464. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
8
Psychometric properties of the Chinese mainland version of the Palliative Care Spiritual Care Competency Scale (PCSCCS-M) in nursing: a cross-sectional study.简体中文版《安宁疗护灵性照护能力量表》在护理中的心理测量学特性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Mar 8;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0409-6.
9
Development and psychometric evaluation of a Total Worker Health® practice scale.《总体员工健康®实践量表的编制与心理计量学评估》
Ann Work Expo Health. 2024 Jun 6;68(5):466-475. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxae030.
10
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].[旨在评估医护人员对酒精依赖患者的知识、认知及实践情况的调查问卷的心理测量学特征]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.

本文引用的文献

1
'It depends': what 86 systematic reviews tell us about what strategies to use to support the use of research in clinical practice.“这取决于”:86 项系统评价告诉我们,应该使用哪些策略来支持研究在临床实践中的应用。
Implement Sci. 2024 Feb 19;19(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01337-z.
2
Mechanisms of change in external implementation support: A conceptual model and case examples to guide research and practice.外部实施支持的变化机制:一个指导研究与实践的概念模型及案例示例
Implement Res Pract. 2023 Jun 21;4:26334895231179761. doi: 10.1177/26334895231179761. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
3
Developing a practice-driven research agenda in implementation science: Perspectives from experienced implementation support practitioners.
在实施科学中制定以实践为导向的研究议程:经验丰富的实施支持从业者的观点。
Implement Res Pract. 2023 Sep 3;4:26334895231199063. doi: 10.1177/26334895231199063. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
Advancing research on teams and team effectiveness in implementation science: An application of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework.推进实施科学中团队及团队效能的研究:探索、准备、实施、维持(EPIS)框架的应用
Implement Res Pract. 2023 Jul 27;4:26334895231190855. doi: 10.1177/26334895231190855. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review.十年实施结果研究:范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2023 Jul 25;18(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z.
6
Is implementation research out of step with implementation practice? Pathways to effective implementation support over the last decade.实施研究是否与实施实践脱节?过去十年实现有效实施支持的途径。
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Jun 6;3:26334895221105585. doi: 10.1177/26334895221105585. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
7
Leveraging academic initiatives to advance implementation practice: a scoping review of capacity building interventions.利用学术举措推进实施实践:能力建设干预措施的范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jul 23;17(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01216-5.
8
Knowledge and attitudes of Implementation Support Practitioners-Findings from a systematic integrative review.实施支持从业者的知识和态度——系统综合评价的结果。
PLoS One. 2022 May 11;17(5):e0267533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267533. eCollection 2022.
9
Implementation support practitioners - a proposal for consolidating a diverse evidence base.实施支持从业者——整合多样化证据基础的建议
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 1;20(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05145-1.
10
Fitting Ordinal Factor Analysis Models With Missing Data: A Comparison Between Pairwise Deletion and Multiple Imputation.拟合存在缺失数据的有序因子分析模型:成对删除法与多重填补法的比较
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Feb;80(1):41-66. doi: 10.1177/0013164419845039. Epub 2019 Apr 26.