School of Urban Design, School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.
School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Aug 20;58(33):14662-14674. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c03995. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
Efforts to stabilize the global climate change while also continuing human development depend upon "decoupling" economic growth from fossil fuel CO emissions. However, evaluations of such decoupling have typically relied on production-based emissions, which do not account for emissions embodied in international trade. Yet international trade can greatly change emissions accounting and reshape the decoupling between emissions and economic growth. Here, we evaluate decoupling of economic growth from different accounts of emissions in each of the 159 countries and analyze the drivers of decoupling. We find that between 1995 and 2015, although 29 countries exhibited strong decoupling of territorial emissions (growing economies and decreasing emissions), only 19 countries achieved economic growth while their consumption-based emissions decreased. Most developed countries have achieved decoupling of emissions related to domestic goods and services, but have not achieved decoupling of emissions related to imported goods and services. The U-test confirms that the domestic component of consumption-based emissions exhibits a stronger decoupling trend from gross domestic product (GDP) growth than consumption-based emissions, and emissions from imports continue to rise with GDP per capita without a corresponding decline, providing a statistical validation of the decoupling analysis. Moreover, in the countries where economic growth and consumption-based emissions are most decoupled, a key driver is decreasing emissions intensity due to technological progress─and especially reductions in the intensity of imported goods and services. Our results reveal the importance of assessing decoupling using consumption-based emissions; successful decoupling may require international cooperation and coordinated mitigation efforts of trading partners.
为了稳定全球气候变化,同时继续人类发展,我们需要实现经济增长与化石燃料 CO 排放的“脱钩”。然而,这种脱钩的评估通常依赖于基于生产的排放量,而没有考虑到国际贸易中的排放。然而,国际贸易可以极大地改变排放核算,并重塑排放与经济增长之间的脱钩关系。在这里,我们评估了 159 个国家中不同排放账户的经济增长脱钩情况,并分析了脱钩的驱动因素。我们发现,在 1995 年至 2015 年期间,尽管有 29 个国家表现出了领土排放的强脱钩(经济增长和排放减少),但只有 19 个国家实现了经济增长,同时其消费型排放减少。大多数发达国家已经实现了与国内商品和服务相关的排放脱钩,但尚未实现与进口商品和服务相关的排放脱钩。U 检验证实,消费型排放的国内部分与国内生产总值(GDP)增长的脱钩趋势强于消费型排放,而进口排放仍随着人均 GDP 增长而上升,没有相应下降,这为脱钩分析提供了统计验证。此外,在经济增长和消费型排放脱钩程度最高的国家,一个关键的驱动因素是由于技术进步导致的排放强度下降,特别是进口商品和服务的强度下降。我们的研究结果表明,使用消费型排放评估脱钩的重要性;成功的脱钩可能需要国际合作和贸易伙伴的协调缓解努力。