Sex matters: Is it time for a SOFA makeover?
作者信息
Larsson Emma
机构信息
Department of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
出版信息
Crit Care. 2024 Aug 8;28(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05030-x.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Sex matters: Is it time for a SOFA makeover?性别很重要：是时候对序贯器官衰竭评估（SOFA）进行改进了吗？
Crit Care. 2024 Aug 8;28(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05030-x.
2
A multicentre prospective registry of one thousand sepsis patients admitted in Indian ICUs: (SEPSIS INDIA) study.一千例在印度 ICU 中收治的脓毒症患者的多中心前瞻性登记研究：（SEPSIS INDIA）研究。
Crit Care. 2024 Nov 19;28(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05176-8.
3
Sex specific differences in short-term mortality after ICU-delirium.重症监护病房谵妄后短期死亡率的性别差异。
Crit Care. 2024 Dec 18;28(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05204-7.
4
Sex differences in the SOFA score of ICU patients with sepsis or septic shock: a nationwide analysis.脓毒症或脓毒性休克 ICU 患者 SOFA 评分的性别差异：一项全国性分析。
Crit Care. 2024 Jun 27;28(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04996-y.
5
Exploring the relationship between severity of patient illness and in room primary care nursing time in a medical intensive care unit.探究医疗重症监护病房中患者疾病严重程度与病房内初级护理时间之间的关系。
Appl Ergon. 2025 Nov;129:104627. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104627. Epub 2025 Aug 23.
6
A Prospective Observational Study on Use of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score to Predict Outcome.一项关于使用急性生理与慢性健康状况评估-II和序贯器官衰竭评估评分来预测预后的前瞻性观察性研究。
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2025 Jun 29;23(1):152-157. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v23i01.5560.
7
Family satisfaction with intensive care and preexisting family and patient characteristics: equivalence analysis of cross-sectional surveys.家庭对重症监护的满意度以及家庭和患者的既往特征：横断面调查的等效性分析
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025 Oct;90:104106. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104106. Epub 2025 Jun 7.
8
Describing organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit: a cohort study of 20,000 patients.描述重症监护病房中的器官功能障碍：一项涉及 20000 名患者的队列研究。
Crit Care. 2019 May 23;23(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2459-9.
9
Analysis of the SOFA score, quick-SOFA, and SIRS criteria in burn patients with infection.烧伤感染患者的序贯器官衰竭评估（SOFA）评分、简化序贯器官衰竭评估（quick-SOFA）及全身炎症反应综合征（SIRS）标准分析
Rev Bras Enferm. 2025 Aug 8;78(3):e20240111. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0111. eCollection 2025.
10
The sex gap among visitors during flexible intensive care unit visiting hours.灵活安排的重症监护病房探视时间内探视者的性别差异。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2019 Oct-Dec;31(4):592-593. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20190089.
引用本文的文献
1
Identification of risk factors for supra-therapeutic vancomycin trough levels in ventilator-assisted critical care patients based on integrated modeling and multi-criteria decision analysis.基于综合建模和多标准决策分析确定机械通气重症监护患者万古霉素谷浓度高于治疗水平的危险因素
PLoS One. 2025 May 23;20(5):e0324510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324510. eCollection 2025.
2
Sex specific differences in short-term mortality after ICU-delirium.重症监护病房谵妄后短期死亡率的性别差异。
Crit Care. 2024 Dec 18;28(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05204-7.
本文引用的文献
1
Sex differences in the SOFA score of ICU patients with sepsis or septic shock: a nationwide analysis.脓毒症或脓毒性休克 ICU 患者 SOFA 评分的性别差异：一项全国性分析。
Crit Care. 2024 Jun 27;28(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04996-y.
2
Sex differences in treatments and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and epidemiological meta-analysis.性别对心原性休克患者治疗效果和预后的影响：系统回顾和流行病学荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2024 Jun 6;28(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04973-5.
3
Influence of gender on age-associated in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a prospective nationwide multicenter cohort study.性别对脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者与年龄相关的院内死亡率的影响：一项前瞻性全国多中心队列研究。
Crit Care. 2023 Jun 11;27(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04515-5.
4
Interactions between Gender and Sepsis-Implications for the Future.性别与脓毒症之间的相互作用——对未来的启示
Microorganisms. 2023 Mar 14;11(3):746. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11030746.
5
Temporal trends in mortality and provision of intensive care in younger women and men with acute myocardial infarction or stroke.急性心肌梗死或脑卒中的年轻女性和男性患者的死亡率和重症监护提供情况的时间趋势。
Crit Care. 2023 Jan 12;27(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04299-0.
6
Sex Differences in Treatment of Adult Intensive Care Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.成年重症监护患者治疗中的性别差异：一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Crit Care Med. 2022 Jun 1;50(6):913-923. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005469. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
7
Sex as a prognostic factor for mortality in critically ill adults with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.性别是脓毒症重症成人死亡率的预后因素：系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 22;11(9):e048982. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048982.
8
Gender differences in the provision of intensive care: a Bayesian approach.性别差异在重症监护中的体现：贝叶斯方法。
Intensive Care Med. 2021 May;47(5):577-587. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06393-3. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
9
Long-term outcome after intensive care for COVID-19: differences between men and women-a nationwide cohort study.新冠肺炎患者重症监护的长期预后：男女之间的差异——一项全国性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2021 Feb 25;25(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03511-x.
10
The impact of patient sex on intensive care unit admission: a blinded randomized survey.患者性别对重症监护病房入院的影响：一项盲法随机调查。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 2;9(1):14222. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50836-3.
Zotero 插件