• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与残疾人合作,而非针对残疾人:仇恨犯罪研究在社区中的作用。

Working "With" Not "On" Disabled People: The Role of Hate Crime Research within the Community.

机构信息

Liverpool Hope University, UK.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2024 Sep;39(17-18):3932-3953. doi: 10.1177/08862605241260005.

DOI:10.1177/08862605241260005
PMID:39119647
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11318224/
Abstract

For many disabled people, violence can become an unwanted, yet ordinary part of everyday life. Often, these crimes are attributed to understandings of disabled people as vulnerable and largely, passive victims. Attending to the aims of this special issue, this paper aims to dismantle these stereotypes and attend to the unique ways that disabled people can resist and respond to hate crime through creative and collaborative research practices. Building upon this, I argue that there is a pressing need for hate studies researchers to work "with" and not "on" those who have experienced targeted violence. Working in this way builds upon long-standing efforts of disabled activists and disabilities studies researchers to challenge reductive research practices by working in more collective and inclusive ways. To demonstrate this, I reflect upon a project working in partnership with disabled people to create a disability hate crime toolkit. The toolkit, now published, shares accessible and informative resources that can be used to raise awareness about disability hate crime. While the focus of this paper is disability, I consider methods of collaboration, co-production and participation that can be drawn upon by researchers to respond to hate crime and interpersonal violence more broadly.

摘要

对于许多残疾人来说,暴力可能成为日常生活中不想要但又很常见的一部分。这些犯罪通常归因于对残疾人的脆弱性和基本被动性受害者的理解。本论文旨在通过创造性和协作性的研究实践,打破这些刻板印象,关注残疾人通过创意和协作研究实践来抵制和应对仇恨犯罪的独特方式。在此基础上,我认为仇恨研究人员迫切需要与那些经历过有针对性暴力的人“合作”,而不是“针对”他们。以这种方式工作是建立在残疾活动家和残疾研究人员的长期努力基础上的,他们通过更具集体性和包容性的方式来挑战简化的研究实践。为了说明这一点,我反思了一个与残疾人合作创建残疾仇恨犯罪工具包的项目。该工具包现已出版,分享了可用于提高对残疾仇恨犯罪认识的无障碍和信息丰富的资源。虽然本文的重点是残疾问题,但我考虑了可以被研究人员用来更广泛地应对仇恨犯罪和人际暴力的合作、共同生产和参与方法。

相似文献

1
Working "With" Not "On" Disabled People: The Role of Hate Crime Research within the Community.与残疾人合作,而非针对残疾人:仇恨犯罪研究在社区中的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Sep;39(17-18):3932-3953. doi: 10.1177/08862605241260005.
2
Hate Crimes Against Trans People: Assessing Emotions, Behaviors, and Attitudes Toward Criminal Justice Agencies.针对跨性别者的仇恨犯罪:评估对刑事司法机构的情绪、行为和态度。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Nov;35(21-22):4583-4613. doi: 10.1177/0886260517715026. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
3
Developing an evidence base for violent and disablist hate crime in Britain: findings from the life opportunities survey.为英国暴力及针对残障者的仇恨犯罪建立证据基础:生活机遇调查结果
J Interpers Violence. 2014 Nov;29(17):3086-104. doi: 10.1177/0886260514534524. Epub 2014 May 28.
4
Hate crimes against LGBT people: National Crime Victimization Survey, 2017-2019.针对 LGBT 人群的仇恨犯罪:2017-2019 年全国犯罪受害者调查。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 21;17(12):e0279363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279363. eCollection 2022.
5
Bystanders' perceptions of perpetrators and victims of hate crime: an investigation using the person perception paradigm.旁观者对仇恨犯罪的犯罪者和受害者的认知:一项运用人物认知范式的调查。
J Interpers Violence. 2003 Sep;18(9):1055-74. doi: 10.1177/0886260503254513.
6
Assessment of Functional and Dysfunctional Perceived Threat of Hate Crimes Among Persons With and Without Disability.评估残疾人和非残疾人对仇恨犯罪的功能性和非功能性感知威胁。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Dec;38(23-24):12135-12160. doi: 10.1177/08862605231191236. Epub 2023 Aug 20.
7
Intellectual disability, hate crime and other social constructions: A view from South Yorkshire.
J Intellect Disabil. 2019 Dec;23(4):486-497. doi: 10.1177/1744629517730181. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
8
"Because I've Got a Learning Disability, They Don't Take Me Seriously:" Violence, Wellbeing, and Devaluing People With Learning Disabilities.“因为我有学习障碍,他们不把我当回事”:学习障碍者的暴力、福祉和被贬低。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jul;37(13-14):NP10912-NP10937. doi: 10.1177/0886260521990828. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
9
Who cares if it is a hate crime? Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender hate crimes--mental health implications and interventions.谁在乎这是不是仇恨犯罪呢?针对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者的仇恨犯罪——心理健康影响和干预。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2013 Apr;49(2):84-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6163.2012.00354.x. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
10
The legal definition of hate crime and the hate offender's distorted cognitions.仇恨犯罪的法律定义与仇恨犯罪者的扭曲认知。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2006 Jul;27(6):597-604. doi: 10.1080/01612840600642877.

本文引用的文献

1
'Internet is easy if you know how to use it': Doing online research with people with learning disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.“如果你知道如何使用,互联网很容易上手”:在新冠疫情期间与学习障碍者一起进行在线研究。
Br J Learn Disabil. 2022 Aug 1. doi: 10.1111/bld.12495.
2
An empirical examination of the use of Easy Read health information in health consultations involving patients with intellectual disabilities.对智力残疾患者参与的健康咨询中使用易读健康信息的实证研究。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Mar;33(2):232-247. doi: 10.1111/jar.12657. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
3
The Use of Videoconferencing for Qualitative Interviewing: Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations.视频会议在定性访谈中的应用:机遇、挑战与考量
Clin Nurs Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):3-8. doi: 10.1177/1054773818803170.
4
Peer-reviewed articles on inclusive research: Do co-researchers with intellectual disabilities have a voice?关于包容性研究的同行评议文章:智障共同研究者有发言权吗?
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Jan;31(1):132-141. doi: 10.1111/jar.12378. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
5
Involving people with learning disabilities in research: issues and possibilities.让学习障碍者参与研究:问题与可能性。
Health Soc Care Community. 2004 Jul;12(4):298-308. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00499.x.
6
Parasites, pawns and partners: disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers.寄生虫、棋子与伙伴:残疾研究及非残疾研究者的角色
Br J Sociol. 1996 Dec;47(4):699-716.