Suppr超能文献

关于包容性研究的同行评议文章:智障共同研究者有发言权吗?

Peer-reviewed articles on inclusive research: Do co-researchers with intellectual disabilities have a voice?

机构信息

School of Education, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.

出版信息

J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Jan;31(1):132-141. doi: 10.1111/jar.12378. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inclusive research is increasingly common in intellectual disabilities research, but ways in which voice of co-researchers with intellectual disabilities is presented remain underexplored in the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

The authors conducted a literature review and analysis of peer-reviewed journal articles reporting on inclusive research. The aim was to explore the ways the voices of co-researchers with intellectual disabilities are represented in published peer-reviewed journal articles.

RESULTS

The findings indicate that there are a wide range of ways in which inclusive research projects are reported in peer-reviewed journals. However, the experiences, views and opinions of co-researchers are often either absent or very selectively reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The article concludes that although inclusive research has proliferated in the 21st century, more attention needs to be paid to the ways in which the voices of co-researchers with intellectual disabilities are heard in formal academic contexts. Guidelines for future practice are offered.

摘要

背景

包容性研究在智力残疾研究中越来越普遍,但合著的智力残疾研究人员的声音在文献中仍未得到充分探讨。

材料与方法

作者对同行评议期刊文章进行了文献回顾和分析,这些文章报告了包容性研究。目的是探讨在已发表的同行评议期刊文章中,合著的智力残疾研究人员的声音是如何被呈现的。

结果

研究结果表明,在同行评议期刊上报告包容性研究项目的方式有很多种。然而,共同研究者的经验、观点和意见往往要么缺失,要么被非常有选择性地报告。

结论

本文得出结论,尽管 21 世纪包容性研究蓬勃发展,但需要更多关注在正式学术背景下如何听到共同研究者的声音。为未来的实践提供了指导方针。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验