• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寄生虫、棋子与伙伴:残疾研究及非残疾研究者的角色

Parasites, pawns and partners: disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers.

作者信息

Stone E, Priestley M

机构信息

Disability Research Unit, University of Leeds.

出版信息

Br J Sociol. 1996 Dec;47(4):699-716.

PMID:8969126
Abstract

Important methodological questions are raised by the act of researching disablement. Disability research has attracted much methodological criticism from disabled people who argue that it has taken place within an oppressive theoretical paradigm and within an oppressive set of social relations. These issues are of heightened significance for non-disabled researchers and bear many similarities to those faced by researchers investigating barriers to the social inclusion of women, Black and 'Third World' peoples. Such challenges have led to the development of an 'emancipatory' research paradigm. Six principles of emancipatory research are identified and the authors own research projects are critically examined within this framework. A number of contradictions are identified and an attempt made to balance the twin requirements of political action and academic rigour.

摘要

对残疾问题的研究引发了重要的方法论问题。残疾研究受到了残疾人的诸多方法论批评,他们认为该研究是在一种压迫性的理论范式和一套压迫性的社会关系中进行的。这些问题对于非残疾研究人员来说具有更高的重要性,并且与研究妇女、黑人和“第三世界”人民社会融入障碍的研究人员所面临的问题有许多相似之处。这些挑战促使了一种“解放性”研究范式的发展。本文确定了解放性研究的六项原则,并在这一框架内对作者自己的研究项目进行了批判性审视。文中识别出了一些矛盾之处,并试图平衡政治行动和学术严谨性这两个双重要求。

相似文献

1
Parasites, pawns and partners: disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers.寄生虫、棋子与伙伴:残疾研究及非残疾研究者的角色
Br J Sociol. 1996 Dec;47(4):699-716.
2
Accessing the field: Disability and the research process.进入研究领域:残疾与研究过程。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jan;72(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.050. Epub 2010 Oct 23.
3
The spaces between: partnerships between women researchers and Indigenous women with disabilities.其间的空间:女性研究人员与残疾原住民女性之间的伙伴关系。
Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(3):191-201. doi: 10.1080/09638280701532276.
4
Towards disability ethics: a social science perspective.走向残疾伦理学:一种社会科学视角。
N Z Bioeth J. 2003 Jun;4(2):7-14.
5
Researching disability: the way forward.研究残疾问题:前进的道路。
Disabil Rehabil. 1992 Oct-Dec;14(4):183-6. doi: 10.3109/09638289209165858.
6
The fuzzy buzz word: conceptualisations of disability in disability research classics.
Sociol Health Illn. 2007 Jul;29(5):750-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01014.x.
7
Disability benefit coverage and program interactions in the working-age population.劳动年龄人口的残疾福利覆盖范围及项目互动
Soc Secur Bull. 2008;68(1):1-30.
8
Potential contributions to disability theorizing and research from positive pyschology.积极心理学对残疾理论化和研究的潜在贡献。
Disabil Rehabil. 2006 May 15;28(9):595-602. doi: 10.1080/00222930500219027.
9
Participatory data analysis alongside co-researchers who have Down syndrome.与患有唐氏综合征的共同研究人员一起进行参与式数据分析。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):23-33. doi: 10.1111/jar.12080. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
10
Disability controversies: past, present, and future.
J Soc Work Disabil Rehabil. 2010;9(2):87-98. doi: 10.1080/1536710X.2010.493475.

引用本文的文献

1
"[T]he most precise and thorough understanding of the situation we are struggling to change": re-capturing emancipatory disability research.“对我们正在努力改变的状况最精确、最全面的理解”:重拾解放性残疾研究。
Front Sociol. 2025 Apr 23;10:1562498. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1562498. eCollection 2025.
2
Community-Informed Recommendations to Developing Inclusive Dance Opportunities: Engaging Community, Dance, and Rehabilitation Experts Using a Hybrid-Delphi Method.基于社区意见的包容性舞蹈发展建议:采用混合德尔菲法让社区、舞蹈及康复专家参与其中
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2025 May;38(3):e70060. doi: 10.1111/jar.70060.
3
Using participatory and inclusive methodologies to explore inclusive education in Africa.
运用参与式和包容性方法探索非洲的全纳教育。
Afr J Disabil. 2024 Oct 18;13:1486. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v13i0.1486. eCollection 2024.
4
Working "With" Not "On" Disabled People: The Role of Hate Crime Research within the Community.与残疾人合作,而非针对残疾人:仇恨犯罪研究在社区中的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Sep;39(17-18):3932-3953. doi: 10.1177/08862605241260005.
5
Co-production of research derived actionable resources for the delivery of Individual Service Funds (EQUALD study): Protocol.为交付个体服务基金(EQUALD 研究)而共同生成可付诸行动的研究资源:方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 3;19(7):e0306522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306522. eCollection 2024.
6
Australian Hospital Experiences of People Living with Deafblindness or Dual Sensory Impairment: The Report Card.澳大利亚聋盲或双重感官障碍患者的医院就医经历:成绩单。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 17;12(8):852. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12080852.
7
"I Don't Feel Like a Gender, I Feel Like Myself": Autistic Individuals Raised as Girls Exploring Gender Identity.“我不觉得自己属于某个性别,我只觉得自己是我自己”:被当作女孩抚养长大的自闭症个体探索性别认同。
Autism Adulthood. 2019 Mar 1;1(1):52-59. doi: 10.1089/aut.2018.0001. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
8
'Getting our voices heard in research: a review of peer researcher's roles and experiences on a qualitative study of adult safeguarding policy.在研究中让我们的声音被听到:对同伴研究者在成人保护政策定性研究中的角色和经历的综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 28;8(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00403-4.
9
The Future of Disability Research in Australia: Protocol for a Multiphase Research Agenda-Setting Study.澳大利亚残疾研究的未来:多阶段研究议程设定研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jan 3;11(1):e31126. doi: 10.2196/31126.
10
Patient participation in research funding: an overview of when, why and how amongst Dutch health funds.患者参与研究资金筹集:荷兰健康基金在何时、为何以及如何参与的概述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Nov 11;5:33. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0163-1. eCollection 2019.