Suppr超能文献

语言生成中的跨模态交互:来自词汇学习的证据。

Cross-modal interactions in language production: evidence from word learning.

作者信息

Pinet Svetlana, Martin Clara D

机构信息

Basque Center On Cognition, Brain and Language, Paseo Mikeletegi 69, 20009, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.

Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):452-462. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02552-x. Epub 2024 Aug 9.

Abstract

Literate adults are able to produce the same word in different language modalities-for instance, through speaking and writing. Yet how speaking and writing interact is not well understood. The present study takes a new perspective on the question of the co-activation of phonological and orthographic representations in speaking and writing by examining the acquisition of novel words. We tested how novel words get integrated into modality-specific lexicons by biasing novel word acquisition toward speaking or writing and assessing cross-modal transfer at the first stages of learning. Participants learned novel words paired with pictures of novel objects and practiced them overtly through speaking or typing. At test, typed training led to higher recall accuracy than spoken training whether words were recalled through typing or speaking. Performance in typing (RT and durations) benefited more from typed than spoken training. Crucially, performance in speaking did not benefit specifically from spoken training and was similar after spoken or typed training. Results are compatible with an asymmetric integration in the phonological and orthographic lexicons according to the modality of training, with representations created in the orthographic lexicon directly transferring to the phonological lexicon, while the opposite doesn't seem to occur. Cross-modal transfer dynamics are discussed according to the level of lexical activation.

摘要

有读写能力的成年人能够在不同的语言模式下产出同一个单词,例如,通过口语和书写。然而,口语和书写如何相互作用尚未得到很好的理解。本研究通过考察新单词的习得,对口语和书写中语音和正字法表征的共同激活问题采取了新的视角。我们通过使新单词的习得偏向口语或书写,并在学习的第一阶段评估跨模式转移,来测试新单词是如何融入特定模式的词汇表中的。参与者学习与新物体图片配对的新单词,并通过口语或打字进行公开练习。在测试中,无论单词是通过打字还是口语回忆,打字训练比口语训练带来更高的回忆准确率。打字(反应时间和持续时间)的表现从打字训练中比从口语训练中受益更多。至关重要的是,口语表现并没有特别从口语训练中受益,在口语或打字训练后表现相似。结果与根据训练模式在语音和正字法词汇表中的不对称整合相一致,即正字法词汇表中创建的表征直接转移到语音词汇表,而相反的情况似乎不会发生。根据词汇激活水平讨论了跨模式转移动态。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验