• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

海马体的时间动态和空间异质性揭示了双相情感障碍患者后代中的脆弱性标志物。

Hippocampal temporal dynamics and spatial heterogeneity unveil vulnerability markers in the offspring of bipolar patients.

作者信息

Saccaro Luigi F, Delavari Farnaz, Van De Ville Dimitri, Piguet Camille

机构信息

Psychiatry Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Psychiatry Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Bipolar Disord. 2025 Feb;27(1):17-27. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13487. Epub 2024 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1111/bdi.13487
PMID:39135100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11848017/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a highly heritable disorder characterized by emotion dysregulation and recurrent oscillations between mood states. Despite the proven efficacy of early interventions, vulnerability markers in high-risk individuals are still lacking. BD patients present structural alterations of the hippocampus, a pivotal hub of emotion regulation networks composed of multiple subregions with different projections. However, the hippocampal dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) in BD remains unclear. We aim to investigate whether the dFC of hippocampal subdivisions differentiates BD patients, offspring of BD patients (BDoff), and healthy controls (HC); and whether it correlates with symptoms differently between these groups.

METHODS

We studied for the first time the dFC of the hippocampus through a cutting-edge micro-co-activation patterns (μCAPs) analysis of resting-state functional MRI data of 97 subjects (26 BD, 18 BDoff, 53 HC). μCAPs allow a data-driven differentiation within the seed region.

RESULTS

dFC between the hippocampal body and a somatomotor-μCAP was lower both in BD patients (p-value:0.00015) and in BDoff (p-value:0.020) than in HC. Inversely, dFC between the hippocampal head and a limbic-μCAP was higher in BD patients than in HC (p-value: 0.005). Furthermore, the correlations between a frontoparietal-μCAP and both depression and emotion dysregulation symptoms were significantly higher in BD than HC (p-value <0.02).

CONCLUSION

Overall, we observed alterations of large-scale functional brain networks associated with decreased cognitive control flexibility and disrupted somatomotor, saliency, and emotion processing in BD. Interestingly, BDoff presented an intermediate phenotype between BD and HC, suggesting that dFC of hippocampal subregions might represent a marker of vulnerability to BD.

摘要

目的

双相情感障碍(BD)是一种高度遗传性疾病,其特征为情绪调节障碍以及情绪状态间的反复波动。尽管早期干预已证实有效,但高危个体中的易感性标志物仍然缺乏。BD患者存在海马结构改变,海马是由多个具有不同投射的子区域组成的情绪调节网络的关键枢纽。然而,BD患者的海马动态功能连接(dFC)仍不清楚。我们旨在研究海马亚区的dFC是否能区分BD患者、BD患者的后代(BDoff)和健康对照(HC);以及在这些组中它与症状的相关性是否不同。

方法

我们首次通过对97名受试者(26名BD患者、18名BDoff、53名HC)的静息态功能磁共振成像数据进行前沿的微共激活模式(μCAPs)分析来研究海马的dFC。μCAPs允许在种子区域内进行数据驱动的区分。

结果

BD患者(p值:0.00015)和BDoff(p值:0.020)中海马体与躯体运动-μCAP之间的dFC均低于HC。相反,BD患者海马头部与边缘-μCAP之间的dFC高于HC(p值:0.005)。此外,BD患者中额顶-μCAP与抑郁和情绪调节障碍症状之间的相关性显著高于HC(p值<0.02)。

结论

总体而言,我们观察到BD患者大脑大规模功能网络的改变,与认知控制灵活性降低以及躯体运动、显著性和情绪处理受损有关。有趣的是,BDoff呈现出BD和HC之间的中间表型,表明海马亚区的dFC可能代表BD易感性的一个标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2075/11848017/9a22cff0bb94/BDI-27-17-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2075/11848017/e3fcc33c36ef/BDI-27-17-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2075/11848017/9a22cff0bb94/BDI-27-17-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2075/11848017/e3fcc33c36ef/BDI-27-17-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2075/11848017/9a22cff0bb94/BDI-27-17-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Hippocampal temporal dynamics and spatial heterogeneity unveil vulnerability markers in the offspring of bipolar patients.海马体的时间动态和空间异质性揭示了双相情感障碍患者后代中的脆弱性标志物。
Bipolar Disord. 2025 Feb;27(1):17-27. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13487. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
2
Dynamic functional hippocampal markers of residual depressive symptoms in euthymic bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍缓解期残留抑郁症状的动态功能性海马标志物。
Brain Behav. 2023 Jun;13(6):e3010. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3010. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
3
Limbic-Sensorimotor Tug of War for the Hippocampus: Dynamic Functional Connectivity as a Transdiagnostic Vulnerability Marker in Offspring of Patients With Emotion Dysregulation.海马体的边缘系统-感觉运动拔河比赛:动态功能连接作为情绪调节障碍患者后代的跨诊断易损性标志物。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2025 Mar 28. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.03.007.
4
Resting-state fMRI signals in offspring of parents with bipolar disorder at the high-risk and ultra-high-risk stages and their relations with cognitive function.处于高危和超高危阶段的双相障碍父母的后代的静息态 fMRI 信号及其与认知功能的关系。
J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Mar;98:99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
5
Longitudinal changes in resting-state functional connectivity as markers of vulnerability or resilience in first-degree relatives of patients with bipolar disorder.静息态功能连接的纵向变化作为双相情感障碍患者一级亲属易感性或恢复力的标志物
Psychol Med. 2024 Aug;54(11):2857-2865. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724000898. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
6
Transdiagnostic time-varying dysconnectivity across major psychiatric disorders.跨主要精神障碍的诊断时间变异性连接不良。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Mar;42(4):1182-1196. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25285. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
7
Reconfiguration of brain network dynamics in bipolar disorder: a hidden Markov model approach.双相情感障碍中脑网络动力学的重构:一种隐马尔可夫模型方法。
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):507. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03212-3.
8
Structural dysconnectivity in offspring of individuals with bipolar disorder: The effect of co-existing clinical-high-risk for bipolar disorder.双相障碍患者后代的结构连接异常:伴发双相障碍临床高风险的影响。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Feb 15;281:109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.122. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
9
Disrupted dynamic functional connectivity in right amygdalar subregions differentiates bipolar disorder from major depressive disorder.右侧杏仁核亚区的动态功能连接中断可区分双相情感障碍与重度抑郁症。
Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2020 Oct 30;304:111149. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2020.111149. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
10
Variation in the CACNB2 gene is associated with functional connectivity of the Hippocampus in bipolar disorder.CACNB2 基因的变异与双相情感障碍中海马体的功能连接有关。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 11;19(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2040-8.

引用本文的文献

1
SR-FTIR Biomolecular Characterization of the Hippocampus: The Role of Tenascin C in Adult Murine Neurogenesis in the Subgranular Zone.海马体的同步辐射傅里叶变换红外光谱生物分子特征:肌腱蛋白C在成年小鼠颗粒下区神经发生中的作用
Cells. 2025 Mar 14;14(6):435. doi: 10.3390/cells14060435.
2
Distinguished Frontal White Matter Abnormalities Between Psychotic and Nonpsychotic Bipolar Disorders in a Pilot Study.一项初步研究中精神分裂性与非精神分裂性双相情感障碍之间显著的额叶白质异常
Brain Sci. 2025 Jan 23;15(2):108. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15020108.
3
Functional Remediation Improves Serum BDNF and TrkB Levels in Euthymic Patients with Bipolar Disorder: A Randomized Trial Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The co-activation patterns of multiple brain regions in Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy.青少年肌阵挛癫痫中多个脑区的共激活模式。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2024 Apr;18(2):337-347. doi: 10.1007/s11571-022-09838-7. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
2
Interventions targeting emotion regulation: A systematic umbrella review.干预情绪调节:系统伞式综述。
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Jun;174:263-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.04.025. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
3
Neural correlations between cognitive deficits and emotion regulation strategies: understanding emotion dysregulation in depression from the perspective of cognitive control and cognitive biases.
功能修复改善双相情感障碍缓解期患者的血清脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)和酪氨酸激酶受体B(TrkB)水平:一项随机试验研究
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2025 Jan 25;21:115-128. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S502176. eCollection 2025.
认知缺陷与情绪调节策略之间的神经关联:从认知控制和认知偏差的角度理解抑郁症中的情绪失调
Psychoradiology. 2022 Nov 10;2(3):86-99. doi: 10.1093/psyrad/kkac014. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Thalamic contributions to psychosis susceptibility: Evidence from co-activation patterns accounting for intra-seed spatial variability (μCAPs).丘脑对精神疾病易感性的影响:基于考虑种子内空间变异性(μCAPs)的共激活模式的证据。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Apr;45(5):e26649. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26649.
5
Inflammation and emotion regulation: a narrative review of evidence and mechanisms in emotion dysregulation disorders.炎症与情绪调节:关于情绪调节障碍中证据与机制的叙述性综述
Neuronal Signal. 2023 Nov 15;7(4):NS20220077. doi: 10.1042/NS20220077. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Dynamic functional hippocampal markers of residual depressive symptoms in euthymic bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍缓解期残留抑郁症状的动态功能性海马标志物。
Brain Behav. 2023 Jun;13(6):e3010. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3010. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
7
Structural and functional MRI correlates of inflammation in bipolar disorder: A systematic review.双相障碍炎症的结构和功能 MRI 相关性:系统综述。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Mar 15;325:83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.162. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
8
Global hippocampus functional connectivity as a predictive neural marker for conversion to future mood disorder in unaffected offspring of bipolar disorder parents.全球海马体功能连接作为预测神经标记物,用于预测双相障碍父母未受影响的后代未来出现心境障碍的可能性。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2022 Dec;78:103307. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103307. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
9
Alterations in resting-state whole-brain functional connectivity pattern similarity in bipolar disorder patients.双相障碍患者静息态全脑功能连接模式相似性的改变。
Brain Behav. 2022 May;12(5):e2580. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2580. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
10
Neural network of bipolar disorder: Toward integration of neuroimaging and neurocircuit-based treatment strategies.双相障碍的神经网络:神经影像学与神经回路为基础的治疗策略的整合。
Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 5;12(1):143. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-01917-x.