• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种通过指导方法加强农场管理团队以减少荷兰高用量猪场抗菌药物使用的研究:一项为期两年的干预性研究。

A coaching approach to strengthen farm management teams to reduce antimicrobial use in Dutch high usage pig farms: a 2 year intervention study.

作者信息

Prinsen Heleen, Deng Huifang, Heederik Dick, Wagenaar Jaap A, Speksnijder David C, Dohmen Wietske

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jul 29;11:1422756. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1422756. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fvets.2024.1422756
PMID:39135896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11317431/
Abstract

The use of antimicrobials in the pig sector in the Netherlands has been reduced by more than 70% over the last decade. However, there is still a considerable number of pig farms that have not been able to lower their antimicrobial usage (AMU) to a sufficiently low level, comparable to the majority of the other pig farms. Therefore, an intervention study was initiated to lower on-farm antimicrobial use in which 45 pig farms with high AMU were recruited. These farms were coached over a period of 2 years whereby different management interventions were introduced. During the 2-year study period a significant reduction of 13 and 17% in total AMU was seen in weaned piglets and fattening pigs respectively. The introduction of coaching as well as multiple management interventions were (univariably) associated with the decrease in AMU. After mutual adjustment of coaching and individual interventions, the association between coaching and AMU became substantially weaker, indicating that coaching and interventions were interrelated and specific interventions explained the reduction in AMU. In conclusion, a coaching effect was observed in this study, with an effect on AMU through specific interventions. More insights are needed regarding the role and effects of coaching on the influence on the management team comprising the farmer, veterinarian and (feed) advisor, and interventions implemented.

摘要

在过去十年中,荷兰养猪业的抗菌药物使用量减少了70%以上。然而,仍有相当数量的养猪场未能将其抗菌药物使用量(AMU)降至足够低的水平,与大多数其他养猪场相当。因此,启动了一项干预研究,以降低农场的抗菌药物使用量,招募了45个抗菌药物使用量高的养猪场。这些农场在两年的时间里接受指导,期间引入了不同的管理干预措施。在为期两年的研究期间,断奶仔猪和育肥猪的总抗菌药物使用量分别显著减少了13%和17%。引入指导以及多种管理干预措施(单变量)与抗菌药物使用量的减少有关。在对指导和个别干预措施进行相互调整后,指导与抗菌药物使用量之间的关联变得明显较弱,这表明指导和干预措施相互关联,特定的干预措施解释了抗菌药物使用量的减少。总之,本研究观察到了指导效果,通过特定干预措施对抗菌药物使用量产生了影响。关于指导对由农民、兽医和(饲料)顾问组成的管理团队的影响以及实施的干预措施的作用和效果,还需要更多的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d7/11317431/1be881902a56/fvets-11-1422756-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d7/11317431/1be881902a56/fvets-11-1422756-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d7/11317431/1be881902a56/fvets-11-1422756-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
A coaching approach to strengthen farm management teams to reduce antimicrobial use in Dutch high usage pig farms: a 2 year intervention study.一种通过指导方法加强农场管理团队以减少荷兰高用量猪场抗菌药物使用的研究:一项为期两年的干预性研究。
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jul 29;11:1422756. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1422756. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparing Farm Biosecurity and Antimicrobial Use in High-Antimicrobial-Consuming Broiler and Pig Farms in the Belgian-Dutch Border Region.对比比利时-荷兰边境地区高抗菌药物消费的肉鸡场和猪场的农场生物安全与抗菌药物使用情况。
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Oct 30;7:558455. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.558455. eCollection 2020.
3
Impact of the Suissano Health Programme on antimicrobial usage on 291 pig farms in Switzerland.瑞士诺健康计划对瑞士291个养猪场抗菌药物使用情况的影响。
Vet Rec Open. 2020 Jun 29;7(1):e000389. doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2019-000389. eCollection 2020.
4
Determining the Characteristics of Farms That Raise Pigs without Antibiotics.确定无抗生素养猪场的特征。
Animals (Basel). 2022 May 10;12(10):1224. doi: 10.3390/ani12101224.
5
Can Improved Farm Biosecurity Reduce the Need for Antimicrobials in Food Animals? A Scoping Review.改善农场生物安全措施能否减少食用动物对抗微生物药物的需求?一项范围综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 May 11;12(5):893. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12050893.
6
Coaching Belgian and Dutch Broiler Farmers Aimed at Antimicrobial Stewardship and Disease Prevention.指导比利时和荷兰的肉鸡养殖户以实现抗菌药物管理和疾病预防
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 May 17;10(5):590. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10050590.
7
Reducing Antimicrobial Usage in Pig Production without Jeopardizing Production Parameters.在不影响生产参数的情况下减少生猪生产中的抗菌药物使用。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2017 Feb;64(1):63-74. doi: 10.1111/zph.12283. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
8
Risk Factors for Antimicrobial Use on Irish Pig Farms.爱尔兰养猪场使用抗菌药物的风险因素。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Sep 28;11(10):2828. doi: 10.3390/ani11102828.
9
The quantitative effect of antimicrobial usage in Danish pig farms on the abundance of antimicrobial resistance genes in slaughter pigs.丹麦养猪场中抗菌药物使用对屠宰猪中抗菌药物耐药基因丰度的定量影响。
Prev Vet Med. 2023 May;214:105899. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105899. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
10
Factors associated with antimicrobial use in pig and veal calf farms in the Netherlands: A multi-method longitudinal data analysis.与荷兰猪和小牛肉牛场中抗菌药物使用相关的因素:一项多方法纵向数据分析。
Prev Vet Med. 2022 Feb;199:105563. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105563. Epub 2021 Dec 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibiotic Use in European Pig Production: Less Is More.欧洲生猪生产中的抗生素使用:少即是多。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Oct 27;11(11):1493. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11111493.
2
Factors associated with antimicrobial use in pig and veal calf farms in the Netherlands: A multi-method longitudinal data analysis.与荷兰猪和小牛肉牛场中抗菌药物使用相关的因素:一项多方法纵向数据分析。
Prev Vet Med. 2022 Feb;199:105563. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105563. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
3
Antibiotic Resistance: From Pig to Meat.抗生素耐药性:从猪到肉
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Oct 5;10(10):1209. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10101209.
4
Comparing Farm Biosecurity and Antimicrobial Use in High-Antimicrobial-Consuming Broiler and Pig Farms in the Belgian-Dutch Border Region.对比比利时-荷兰边境地区高抗菌药物消费的肉鸡场和猪场的农场生物安全与抗菌药物使用情况。
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Oct 30;7:558455. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.558455. eCollection 2020.
5
Implementation and evaluation of an antimicrobial stewardship programme in companion animal clinics: A stepped-wedge design intervention study.实施和评估伴侣动物诊所的抗菌药物管理计划:一项基于逐步式楔形设计的干预研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 18;14(11):e0225124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225124. eCollection 2019.
6
Exploring Perspectives on Antimicrobial Use in Livestock: A Mixed-Methods Study of UK Pig Farmers.探索英国养猪户抗菌药物使用情况的观点:一项混合方法研究
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Aug 2;6:257. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00257. eCollection 2019.
7
Association between antimicrobial usage, biosecurity measures as well as farm performance in German farrow-to-finish farms.德国从产仔到育肥猪场的抗菌药物使用、生物安全措施与农场生产性能之间的关联。
Porcine Health Manag. 2018 Dec 14;4:30. doi: 10.1186/s40813-018-0106-5. eCollection 2018.
8
Herd-specific interventions to reduce antimicrobial usage in pig production without jeopardising technical and economic performance.在不影响技术和经济性能的前提下,针对猪群采取特定干预措施以减少养猪生产中抗菌药物的使用。
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Sep 1;144:167-178. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
9
Effect of structural animal health planning on antimicrobial use and animal health variables in conventional dairy farming in the Netherlands.结构动物健康计划对荷兰常规奶牛养殖中抗菌药物使用和动物健康变量的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Jun;100(6):4903-4913. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11924. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
10
Farm-economic analysis of reducing antimicrobial use whilst adopting improved management strategies on farrow-to-finish pig farms.对在全进全出养猪场采用改进管理策略的同时减少抗菌药物使用的农场经济分析。
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Jul 1;129:74-87. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 6.