Leydolt Christina, Schartmüller Daniel, Schwarzenbacher Luca, Prenner Veronika, Danzinger Victor, Lisy Marcus, Abela-Formanek Claudette, Menapace Rupert
From the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Dec 1;50(12):1242-1246. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001539.
To compare intraindividually the incidence and intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates between 2 similar open-loop single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) differing slightly in their particular material, optic surface, and sharp posterior edge design over a period of 3 years.
Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Randomized, prospective, patient-masked and examiner-masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison.
100 patients randomly received a Vivinex XY1 IOL in 1 eye and a Clareon CNA0T0 IOL in the fellow eye. The amount of PCO (score 0 to 10) was assessed subjectively and objectively with digital retroillumination pictures using automated image analysis software (Automated Quantification of After-Cataract). Corrected distance visual acuity and the presence of glistenings, subjective visual symptoms, and Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rate were noted.
67 of 100 patients were available for the 3-year follow-up examination. The objective PCO score of the Vivinex XY1 IOLs was 1.0 ± 1.0 compared with the PCO score of 1.5 ± 1.2 for the Clareon CNA0T0 IOLs ( P < .001). 7.5% of patients had a Nd:YAG capsulotomy in the Vivinex XY1 eye, and 9.0% had a capsulotomy in the Clareon CNA0T0 eye ( P = 1.0).
Both hydrophobic acrylic IOLs showed low PCO and YAG rates with a small but significant favor of the Vivinex XY1 IOL compared with the Clareon CNA0T0 IOL. The interaction of various factors such as hydrophobic material, smooth optic surface, and sharp posterior optic edge is the major key for PCO prevention.
NCT04369482.
在3年的时间里,对两种类似的开环一体式疏水丙烯酸人工晶状体(IOL)进行个体内比较,这两种人工晶状体在特定材料、光学表面和尖锐后缘设计上略有不同,比较后囊膜混浊(PCO)的发生率和严重程度以及钕:钇铝石榴石(Nd:YAG)囊切开术的发生率。
奥地利维也纳医科大学眼科。
随机、前瞻性、患者和检查者双盲的个体内比较临床试验。
100例患者一只眼随机植入Vivinex XY1人工晶状体,另一只眼植入Clareon CNA0T0人工晶状体。使用自动图像分析软件(后发性白内障自动定量分析)通过数字后照法图片主观和客观地评估PCO的程度(0至10分)。记录矫正远视力、是否存在晶状体闪光、主观视觉症状以及Nd:YAG激光囊切开术的发生率。
100例患者中有67例完成了3年的随访检查。Vivinex XY1人工晶状体的客观PCO评分为1.0±1.0,而Clareon CNA0T0人工晶状体的PCO评分为1.5±1.2(P<0.001)。7.5%的患者在植入Vivinex XY1人工晶状体的眼中接受了Nd:YAG囊切开术,9.0%的患者在植入Clareon CNA0T0人工晶状体的眼中接受了囊切开术(P = 1.0)。
两种疏水丙烯酸人工晶状体的PCO和YAG发生率均较低,与Clareon CNA0T0人工晶状体相比,Vivinex XY1人工晶状体有轻微但显著的优势。疏水材料、光滑的光学表面和尖锐的后光学边缘等多种因素的相互作用是预防PCO的关键。
NCT04369482。