Suppr超能文献

使用驴慢性疼痛量表对驴的慢性疼痛进行客观评估。

Objective assessment of chronic pain in donkeys using the Donkey Chronic Pain Scale.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Sporthorse Medical Diagnostic Centre (SMDC), Heesch, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Sciences and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Vet Anaesth Analg. 2024 Sep-Oct;51(5):531-538. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2024.05.011. Epub 2024 May 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To clinically evaluate previously developed pain scales [Donkey Chronic Pain Composite Pain Scale (DCP-CPS), Donkey Chronic Pain Facial Assessment of Pain (DCP-FAP) and combined Donkey Chronic Pain Scale (DCPS)], including behavioural and facial expression-based variables, for the assessment of chronic pain in donkeys.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, blinded clinical study.

ANIMAL

A group of 77 donkeys (34 patients and 43 healthy control animals).

METHODS

Animals were assessed by two observers that were blinded to the condition of the animals.

RESULTS

Both DCP-CPS and DCP-FAP, and resulting combined DCPS scores, showed good interobserver reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.86-0.95, p < 0.001; ICC = 0.71, CI = 0.50-0.83, p < 0.001 and ICC = 0.84, CI = 0.72-0.91, p < 0.001, respectively]. All scores (DCP-CPS, DCP-FAP and the resulting combined DCPS) were significantly higher for patients than for controls at all time points (p < 0.001 for all three scales). Sensitivity and specificity for identification of pain (cut-off value >3) was 73.0% and 65.1% for DCP-CPS, and 60.9% and 83.3% for DCP-FAP, respectively. For the combined DCPS, sensitivity was 87.0% and specificity 90.9% (cut-off value >6).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Based on behavioural and facial expression-based variables, DCPS proved a promising and reproducible tool to assess different types of chronic pain in donkeys. The combination of behavioural and facial expression-based variables showed the best discriminatory characteristics in the current study. Further studies are needed for refinement of these tools.

摘要

目的

临床评估先前开发的疼痛量表[驴慢性疼痛综合疼痛量表(DCP-CPS)、驴慢性疼痛面部疼痛评估(DCP-FAP)和联合驴慢性疼痛量表(DCPS)],包括行为和面部表情变量,用于评估驴的慢性疼痛。

研究设计

前瞻性、盲法临床研究。

动物

一组 77 匹驴(34 例患者和 43 头健康对照动物)。

方法

由两名观察者对动物进行评估,观察者对动物的状况不知情。

结果

DCP-CPS 和 DCP-FAP 以及由此产生的联合 DCPS 评分均表现出良好的观察者间可靠性[组内相关系数(ICC)=0.91,95%置信区间(CI)=0.86-0.95,p<0.001;ICC=0.71,CI=0.50-0.83,p<0.001 和 ICC=0.84,CI=0.72-0.91,p<0.001]。在所有时间点,患者的所有评分(DCP-CPS、DCP-FAP 和由此产生的联合 DCPS)均显著高于对照组(所有三个量表均为 p<0.001)。用于识别疼痛(截断值>3)的敏感性和特异性分别为 DCP-CPS 的 73.0%和 65.1%,DCP-FAP 的 60.9%和 83.3%。对于联合 DCPS,敏感性为 87.0%,特异性为 90.9%(截断值>6)。

结论和临床相关性

基于行为和面部表情变量,DCPS 被证明是一种有前途且可重复的工具,可用于评估驴的不同类型的慢性疼痛。在本研究中,行为和面部表情变量的组合表现出最佳的鉴别特征。需要进一步的研究来改进这些工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验