Zhang Wan, Guo Jiangtao, Ning Cuiping, Cheng Ruifang, Liu Ze
College of Architecture Engineering, Yangling Vocational & Technical College, Shaanxi, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China.
College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 14;14(1):18918. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69616-9.
Concrete compressive strength testing is crucial for construction quality control. The traditional methods are both time-consuming and labor-intensive, while machine learning has been proven effective in predicting the compressive strength of concrete. However, current machine learning-based algorithms lack a thorough comparison among various models, and researchers have yet to identify the optimal predictor for concrete compressive strength. In this study, we developed 12 distinct machine learning-based regressors to conduct a thorough comparison and to identify the optimal model. To study the correlation between compressive strength and various factors, we conducted a comprehensive analysis and selected blast furnace slag, superplasticizer, age, cement, and water as the optimized factor subset. Based on this foundation, grid search and fivefold cross-validation were employed to establish the hyperparameters for each model. The results indicate that the Deepforest-based model demonstrates superior performance compared to the 12 models. For a more comprehensive evaluation of the model's performance, we compared its performance with state-of-the-art models using the same independent testing dataset. The results demonstrate that our model achieving the highest performance (R of 0.91), indicating its accurate prediction capability for concrete compressive strength.
混凝土抗压强度测试对于施工质量控制至关重要。传统方法既耗时又费力,而机器学习已被证明在预测混凝土抗压强度方面是有效的。然而,当前基于机器学习的算法缺乏对各种模型的全面比较,并且研究人员尚未确定用于混凝土抗压强度的最佳预测器。在本研究中,我们开发了12种不同的基于机器学习的回归器,以进行全面比较并确定最佳模型。为了研究抗压强度与各种因素之间的相关性,我们进行了综合分析,并选择了高炉矿渣、高效减水剂、龄期、水泥和水作为优化因素子集。在此基础上,采用网格搜索和五折交叉验证来为每个模型确定超参数。结果表明,与这12个模型相比,基于深度森林的模型表现出卓越的性能。为了更全面地评估模型的性能,我们使用相同的独立测试数据集将其性能与最先进的模型进行了比较。结果表明,我们的模型实现了最高性能(R为0.91),表明其对混凝土抗压强度具有准确的预测能力。