Clinton J E, Zoll P M, Zoll R, Ruiz E
J Emerg Med. 1985;2(3):155-62. doi: 10.1016/0736-4679(85)90390-7.
Thirty-seven critical emergency department patients underwent attempts at external cardiac pacing over an 11-month period. Indications for pacing were asystole in 16, complete heart block (CHB) in 4, sinus bradycardia in 2, nodal bradycardia in 1, atrial fibrillation with bradycardia in 2, electromechanical dissociation in 1, idioventricular rhythm (IVR) in 10, and torsades de pointes in 1. Eight patients were successfully paced with improvement in their condition. Two were in asystole, two in CHB, three in sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation with bradycardia, and one in idioventricular rhythm. Mean systolic blood pressure rise with pacing was 95 +/- 50 mm Hg. Six of these patients were ultimately discharged from the hospital. One asystolic patient survived to discharge. Other survivors presented with either CHB or bradycardia. Of the 29 patients who did not respond to pacing, 5 survived to hospital discharge. Surviving nonresponder presenting rhythms were CHB in one patient, sinus or nodal bradycardia in two, IVR in one, and torsades de pointes in one. External cardiac pacemaking appears to be effective in hemodynamically significant bradycardia. It does not appear to be effective in most instances of asystole or IVR resulting from prolonged cardiac arrest. When applied to patients with a responsive myocardium, it may result in significant hemodynamic improvement and may be lifesaving.
在11个月的时间里,37名急诊科危重症患者接受了体外心脏起搏尝试。起搏的适应证包括:16例心搏骤停、4例完全性心脏传导阻滞(CHB)、2例窦性心动过缓、1例结性心动过缓、2例心房颤动伴心动过缓、1例电机械分离、10例心室自主节律(IVR)和1例尖端扭转型室速。8例患者成功起搏,病情改善。其中2例为心搏骤停,2例为CHB,3例为窦性心律或心房颤动伴心动过缓,1例为心室自主节律。起搏时平均收缩压升高95±50mmHg。这些患者中有6例最终出院。1例心搏骤停患者存活出院。其他存活者表现为CHB或心动过缓。在29例对起搏无反应的患者中,5例存活至出院。存活的无反应者的心律包括:1例CHB、2例窦性或结性心动过缓、1例IVR和1例尖端扭转型室速。体外心脏起搏似乎对血流动力学显著的心动过缓有效。在大多数因长时间心脏骤停导致的心搏骤停或IVR情况下,它似乎无效。当应用于有反应性心肌的患者时,它可能会导致显著的血流动力学改善,可能挽救生命。