Hu Hui-Ling, Li Serena Zhe-Chuang, Feng Ai-Ying, Zhong Hao-Xi, Mu Jing-Feng, Liu Mei-Zhou
Shenzhen Eye Hospital, Jinan University, Shenzhen Eye Institute, Shenzhen 518040, Guangdong Province, China.
NIMO Ophthalmology Research Institute, Beijing 100176, China.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 18;17(8):1477-1482. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.08.13. eCollection 2024.
To compare relative peripheral refraction (RPR) in Chinese school children with different refractive errors using multispectral refraction topography (MRT).
A total of 713 eyes of primary school children [172 emmetropia (E), 429 low myopia (LM), 80 moderate myopia (MM), and 32 low hypermetropia (LH)] aged 10 to 13y were analyzed. RPRs were measured using MRT without mydriasis. MRT results showed RPR at 0-15° (RPR 0-15), 15°-30° (RPR 15-30), and 30°-45° (RPR 30-45) annular in the inferior (RPR-I), superior (RPR-S), nasal (RPR-N), and temporal (RPR-T) quadrants. Spherical equivalent (SE) was detected and calculated using an autorefractor.
There were significant differences of RPR 15-30 between groups MM [0.02 (-0.12; 0.18)] and LH [-0.13 (-0.36; 0.12)] (<0.05), MM and E [-0.06 (-0.20; 0.10)] (<0.05), and LM [-0.02 (-0.15; 0.15)] and E (<0.05). There were also significant differences of RPR 30-45 between groups MM [0.45 (0.18; 0.74)] and E [0.29 (-0.09; 0.67)] (<0.05), and LM [0.44 (0.14; 0.76)] and E (<0.001). RPR values increased from the hyperopic to medium myopic group in each annular. There were significant differences of RPR-S between groups MM [-0.02 (-0.60; 0.30)] and E [-0.44 (-0.89; -0.04)] (<0.001), and LM [-0.28 (-0.71; 0.12)] and E (<0.05). There were also significant differences of RPR-T between groups MM [0.37 (0.21; 0.78)] and LH [0.14 (-0.52; 0.50)] (<0.05), LM [0.41 (0.06; 0.84)] and LH (<0.05), and LM and E [0.29 (-0.10; 0.68), <0.05]. A Spearman's correlation analysis showed a negative correlation between RPR and SE in the 15°-30° (=0.005), 30°-45° (<0.05) annular (=0.002), superior (<0.001), and temporal (=0.001) quadrants.
Without pupil dilation, values for RPR 15-30, 30-45, RPR-S, and T shows significant differences between myopic eyes and emmetropia, and the differences are negatively correlated with SE.
使用多光谱屈光地形图(MRT)比较不同屈光不正的中国学龄儿童的相对周边屈光(RPR)。
分析了10至13岁小学生的713只眼[172只正视眼(E)、429只低度近视眼(LM)、80只中度近视眼(MM)和32只低度远视眼(LH)]。在不散瞳的情况下使用MRT测量RPR。MRT结果显示在下方(RPR-I)、上方(RPR-S)、鼻侧(RPR-N)和颞侧(RPR-T)象限中0-15°(RPR 0-15)、15°-30°(RPR 15-30)和30°-45°(RPR 30-45)环形区域的RPR。使用自动验光仪检测并计算等效球镜度(SE)。
MM组[0.02(-0.12;0.18)]与LH组[-0.13(-0.36;0.12)]之间的RPR 15-30存在显著差异(<0.05),MM组与E组[-0.06(-0.20;0.10)]之间存在显著差异(<0.05),LM组[-0.02(-0.15;0.15)]与E组之间存在显著差异(<0.05)。MM组[0.45(0.18;0.74)]与E组[0.29(-0.09;0.67)]之间的RPR 30-45也存在显著差异(<0.05),LM组[0.44(0.14;0.76)]与E组之间存在显著差异(<0.001)。在每个环形区域中,RPR值从远视组到中度近视组增加。MM组[-0.02(-0.60;0.30)]与E组[-0.44(-0.89;-0.04)]之间的RPR-S存在显著差异(<0.001),LM组[-0.28(-0.71;0.12)]与E组之间存在显著差异(<0.05)。MM组[0.37(0.21;0.78)]与LH组[0.14(-0.52;0.50)]之间的RPR-T也存在显著差异(<0.05),LM组[0.41(0.06;0.84)]与LH组之间存在显著差异(<0.05),LM组与E组[0.29(-0.10;0.68),<0.05]之间存在显著差异。Spearman相关性分析显示,在15°-30°(=0.005)、30°-45°(<0.05)环形区域(=0.002)、上方(<0.001)和颞侧(=0.001)象限中,RPR与SE之间存在负相关。
在不散瞳的情况下,近视眼中的RPR 15-30、30-45、RPR-S和RPR-T值与正视眼之间存在显著差异,且这些差异与SE呈负相关。