• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男性急性尿潴留无导尿管即刻或延迟试验:一项系统评价

Immediate or delayed trial without catheter in acute urinary retention in males: A systematic review.

作者信息

Christensen Veronika S, Skow Marius, Flottorp Signe A, Strømme Hilde, Mdala Ibrahimu, Vallersnes Odd Martin

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway.

The Antibiotic Centre for Primary Care University of Oslo Oslo Norway.

出版信息

BJUI Compass. 2024 May 14;5(8):732-747. doi: 10.1002/bco2.369. eCollection 2024 Aug.

DOI:10.1002/bco2.369
PMID:39157169
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11327489/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the success of establishing spontaneous micturition following immediate trial without catheter (TWOC) to delayed TWOC in males catheterized for acute urinary retention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this systematic review, we included studies reporting success rates of immediate TWOC or delayed TWOC (≤30 days) among males ≥18 years of age catheterized for acute urinary retention. We excluded studies on suprapubic catheterization, postoperative/perioperative catheterization and urinary retention related to trauma. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Open Grey and Clinicaltrials.gov. The search was concluded on 30 November 2022. There were no restrictions on language or publication date. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. We did random-effects restricted maximum likelihood model meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.

RESULTS

We included 61 studies. In two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), both with some concerns for risk of bias, including in total 174 participants, the relative success rate was 1.22 (95% CI 0.84-1.76) favouring delayed TWOC. In two comparative cohort studies, both with serious risk of bias, including 642 participants, the relative success rate was 1.18 (0.94-1.47) favouring delayed TWOC. One study was excluded from this meta-analysis because of critically low quality. Four studies reporting success rates for cohorts with immediate TWOC, all with serious risk of bias, including 409 participants, had an overall success rate of 47% (29-66). Fifty-two studies reporting success rates for cohorts with delayed TWOC, all with serious risk of bias, including 12 489 participants, had an overall success rate of 53% (49-56). The certainty of the evidence was considered low for the RCTs and very low for the rest.

CONCLUSION

There was a limited number of appropriately designed studies addressing the research question directly. The evidence favours neither approach.

摘要

目的

比较急性尿潴留男性患者立即试行拔除导尿管(TWOC)与延迟TWOC后自主排尿成功的情况。

材料与方法

在本系统评价中,我们纳入了报告18岁及以上因急性尿潴留留置导尿管男性患者立即TWOC或延迟TWOC(≤30天)成功率的研究。我们排除了耻骨上膀胱造瘘术、术后/围手术期导尿以及与创伤相关的尿潴留的研究。我们检索了以下数据库:MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane系统评价数据库、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、Open Grey和Clinicaltrials.gov。检索于2022年11月30日结束。对语言或出版日期没有限制。使用ROB 2.0和ROBINS - I工具评估偏倚风险。我们进行了随机效应限制最大似然模型的荟萃分析。使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。

结果

我们纳入了61项研究。在两项随机对照试验(RCT)中,两者均存在一些偏倚风险问题,共纳入174名参与者,相对成功率为1.22(95%CI 0.84 - 1.76),支持延迟TWOC。在两项比较队列研究中,两者均存在严重偏倚风险,共纳入642名参与者,相对成功率为1.18(0.94 - 1.47),支持延迟TWOC。一项研究因质量极低而被排除在该荟萃分析之外。四项报告立即TWOC队列成功率的研究,均存在严重偏倚风险,共纳入409名参与者,总体成功率为47%(29 - 66)。五十二项报告延迟TWOC队列成功率的研究,均存在严重偏倚风险,共纳入12489名参与者,总体成功率为53%(49 - 56)。RCT的证据确定性被认为较低,其余研究的证据确定性非常低。

结论

直接针对该研究问题进行适当设计的研究数量有限。证据对两种方法均无支持倾向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/008f/11327489/48cebc0e9f21/BCO2-5-732-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/008f/11327489/5eed395183ae/BCO2-5-732-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/008f/11327489/339210e71c2e/BCO2-5-732-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/008f/11327489/48cebc0e9f21/BCO2-5-732-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/008f/11327489/5eed395183ae/BCO2-5-732-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/008f/11327489/339210e71c2e/BCO2-5-732-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/008f/11327489/48cebc0e9f21/BCO2-5-732-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Immediate or delayed trial without catheter in acute urinary retention in males: A systematic review.男性急性尿潴留无导尿管即刻或延迟试验:一项系统评价
BJUI Compass. 2024 May 14;5(8):732-747. doi: 10.1002/bco2.369. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The management of acute urinary retention in France: a cross-sectional survey in 2618 men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.法国急性尿潴留的管理:对2618例良性前列腺增生男性患者的横断面调查
BJU Int. 2006 Apr;97(4):727-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06109.x.
4
Alpha blockers prior to removal of a catheter for acute urinary retention in adult men.成年男性急性尿潴留患者拔除导尿管前使用α受体阻滞剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD006744. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006744.pub2.
5
Impact of Duration of Catheterization on the Success Rate of Trial Without Catheter in Acute Urinary Retention Due to Benign Prostatic Enlargement.导尿持续时间对良性前列腺增生所致急性尿潴留患者试行拔管成功率的影响
Cureus. 2023 Jul 31;15(7):e42716. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42716. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Management of acute urinary retention: a worldwide survey of 6074 men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.急性尿潴留的管理:对 6074 名良性前列腺增生男性的全球调查。
BJU Int. 2012 Jan;109(1):88-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10430.x. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
7
Comparing effects of alpha-blocker management on acute urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较α受体阻滞剂治疗对良性前列腺增生继发急性尿潴留的影响:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Prostate Int. 2023 Jun;11(2):91-99. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.12.002. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
8
The role of alpha blockers prior to removal of urethral catheter for acute urinary retention in men.α受体阻滞剂在男性急性尿潴留拔除尿道导管前的作用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 10;2014(6):CD006744. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006744.pub3.
9
Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of bladder training before removing the indwelling urinary catheter in patients with acute urinary retention associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia.良性前列腺增生所致急性尿潴留患者拔除留置导尿管前膀胱训练效果的随机对照试验
Scand J Urol. 2014 Aug;48(4):400-4. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2014.903512. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
10
Elements for Trial Without Catheter (TWOC) Success in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients: Lessons We Have Learned.良性前列腺增生患者无导尿管试验(TWOC)成功的要素:我们学到的经验教训。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 23;15(12):e50980. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50980. eCollection 2023 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Erratum.勘误
BJUI Compass. 2024 Dec 30;5(12):1324-1329. doi: 10.1002/bco2.482. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
2
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 解释和说明:系统评价报告的更新指南和范例。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.
3
Urinary Retention.尿潴留
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2019 Nov;37(4):649-660. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
4
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
5
Evaluation of the impact of a clinical pathway on the progression of acute urinary retention.评价临床路径对急性尿潴留进展的影响。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Jan;38(1):387-392. doi: 10.1002/nau.23873. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
6
Predictive variables of spontaneous micturition recovery after acute urinary retention in men with benign prostatic enlargement: An observational prospective study.
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2019 May;11(3):104-108. doi: 10.1111/luts.12241. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
A Multicenter Study of Patient-Reported Infectious and Noninfectious Complications Associated With Indwelling Urethral Catheters.留置导尿管相关的患者报告的感染性和非感染性并发症的多中心研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Aug 1;178(8):1078-1085. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2417.
8
[Prognostic factors predicting failure of the trial without catheter after tamsulosin in patients with acute urinary retention.].[坦索罗辛治疗急性尿潴留患者后无导尿管试验失败的预测预后因素。]
Arch Esp Urol. 2017 Nov;70(9):759-765.
9
Predictors of successful trial without catheter following acute urinary retention in benign prostatic enlargement: A single centre, multivariate analysis.良性前列腺增生急性尿潴留后无导尿管成功试验的预测因素:单中心多变量分析
Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Sep;36(7):1757-1762. doi: 10.1002/nau.23194. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
10
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.