• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雾化吸入监测仪在门诊基层医疗药房诊所的有效性

Effectiveness of an Aerosol Inhalation Monitor in an Ambulatory Primary Care Pharmacy Clinic.

作者信息

Nixon Bianca, Axtell Sandra

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic Hillcrest Primary Care, Cleveland Clinic Hillcrest Hospital, Mayfield Heights, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Technol. 2024 Aug;40(4):178-185. doi: 10.1177/87551225241258873. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1177/87551225241258873
PMID:39157640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11325678/
Abstract

Poor inhaler technique can worsen respiratory disease. An Aerosol Inhalation Monitor (AIM) may provide insight into a patient's capability of utilizing inhaled medications. The purpose of this quality assessment was to determine if the addition of the Vitalograph AIM device by ambulatory care pharmacists within an outpatient primary care clinic improves patient's disease control through changes in pharmacotherapy. This was a retrospective, longitudinal, quality assessment review. Pharmacists met with patients for initial and follow-up appointments. A chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) or Asthma Control Test (ACT) and AIM assessment were performed and pharmacotherapy was subsequently adjusted. The primary endpoint was the change in initial to last recorded ACT and CAT score and was analyzed by Wilcoxon sign-rank test. Twenty asthma and 17 COPD patients were included; 13 asthma and 13 COPD patients were included in the primary and secondary endpoint analysis. Initial median (interquartile range [IQR]) ACT score was 17 (14-23), first follow-up was 20 (18-24), and last recorded score was 22 (18-23). Initial median (IQR) CAT score was 17 (12-22), first follow-up score was 14 (6-20), and last recorded score was 11 (6-19). There was no statistical difference between initial CAT or ACT to first follow-up or last recorded CAT or ACT. Most patients continued their current inhaler regimen. This review demonstrates the positive effect pharmacists can have on respiratory disease management. The improvement in ACT and CAT scores suggests a positive, clinically significant outcome. Future research should evaluate pharmacist's effect on asthma and COPD readmission rates.

摘要

吸入器使用技术不佳会使呼吸系统疾病恶化。气溶胶吸入监测仪(AIM)或许能深入了解患者使用吸入药物的能力。本质量评估的目的是确定门诊初级保健诊所的门诊护理药剂师添加维托拉夫AIM设备是否能通过调整药物治疗来改善患者的疾病控制情况。这是一项回顾性、纵向的质量评估审查。药剂师与患者进行初次和随访预约。进行慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)评估测试(CAT)或哮喘控制测试(ACT)以及AIM评估,随后调整药物治疗。主要终点是首次记录到最后记录的ACT和CAT分数的变化,并通过威尔科克森符号秩检验进行分析。纳入了20名哮喘患者和17名COPD患者;13名哮喘患者和13名COPD患者纳入了主要和次要终点分析。初始ACT中位数(四分位间距[IQR])分数为17(14 - 23),首次随访为20(18 - 24),最后记录的分数为22(18 - 23)。初始CAT中位数(IQR)分数为17(12 - 22),首次随访分数为14(6 - 20),最后记录的分数为11(6 - 19)。初始CAT或ACT与首次随访或最后记录的CAT或ACT之间无统计学差异。大多数患者继续使用当前的吸入器治疗方案。本综述表明药剂师在呼吸系统疾病管理中可发挥积极作用。ACT和CAT分数的改善表明有积极的、具有临床意义的结果。未来的研究应评估药剂师对哮喘和COPD再入院率的影响。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of an Aerosol Inhalation Monitor in an Ambulatory Primary Care Pharmacy Clinic.雾化吸入监测仪在门诊基层医疗药房诊所的有效性
J Pharm Technol. 2024 Aug;40(4):178-185. doi: 10.1177/87551225241258873. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
2
Optimization of patient-specific inhaler regimens with the use of the aerosol inhalation monitor.使用气雾剂吸入监测器优化患者特异性吸入器方案。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 Mar-Apr;59(2):252-257. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
3
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.
4
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
5
Improvement in Inhaler Techniques After Training and Counseling in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or Asthma.慢性阻塞性肺疾病或哮喘患者经培训与咨询后吸入技术的改善
Cureus. 2024 Jun 12;16(6):e62255. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62255. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Effect of a Multidimensional Pharmaceutical Care Intervention on Inhalation Technique in Patients with Asthma and COPD.多维药物治疗干预对哮喘和 COPD 患者吸入技术的影响。
Can Respir J. 2020 Nov 18;2020:8572636. doi: 10.1155/2020/8572636. eCollection 2020.
7
Impact of pharmacist-led intervention in medication adherence and inhaler usage on asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease control: a quasi-experimental study.药剂师主导的干预对药物依从性和吸入器使用对哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病控制的影响:一项准实验研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):1199. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11683-9.
8
Impact of Pharmacist-Led Intervention on Adherence to Inhalers, Inhalation Technique, and Disease Control Among Asthma/COPD Patients in a Resource Limited Center: An Interventional Study.药师主导的干预措施对资源有限中心哮喘/慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入器依从性、吸入技术和疾病控制的影响:一项干预性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jul 1;18:1395-1408. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S460810. eCollection 2024.
9
Use and inhalation technique of inhaled medication in patients with asthma and COPD: data from a randomized controlled trial.哮喘和 COPD 患者吸入药物的使用和吸入技术:一项随机对照试验的数据。
Respir Res. 2018 Dec 3;19(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0936-3.
10
Interventions to improve adherence to pharmacological therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).干预措施以提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)药物治疗的依从性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 8;9(9):CD013381. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013381.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 Report: GOLD Executive Summary.全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议 2023 年报告:GOLD 执行摘要。
Eur Respir J. 2023 Apr 1;61(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00239-2023. Print 2023 Apr.
2
Impact of Pharmacist Education on Inhaler Technique and Adherence in an Outpatient Clinic.药师教育对门诊患者吸入器使用技术及依从性的影响
Hosp Pharm. 2022 Jun;57(3):402-407. doi: 10.1177/00185787211046863. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
3
Optimization of patient-specific inhaler regimens with the use of the aerosol inhalation monitor.使用气雾剂吸入监测器优化患者特异性吸入器方案。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 Mar-Apr;59(2):252-257. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
4
Critical inhaler errors in asthma and COPD: a systematic review of impact on health outcomes.哮喘和 COPD 中的关键性吸入器错误:对健康结局影响的系统评价。
Respir Res. 2018 Jan 16;19(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12931-017-0710-y.
5
Evaluation of the Prevalence and Effectiveness of Education on Metered-Dose Inhaler Technique.定量吸入器技术教育的患病率及效果评估
Respir Care. 2017 Jul;62(7):882-887. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05246. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation and inhaler device handling: real-life assessment of 2935 patients.慢性阻塞性肺疾病恶化和吸入器装置处理:2935 例患者的真实生活评估。
Eur Respir J. 2017 Feb 15;49(2). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01794-2016. Print 2017 Feb.
7
Inhaler assessment in COPD patients: A primer for pharmacists.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的吸入器评估:药剂师入门指南。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2016 Sep;149(5):268-273. doi: 10.1177/1715163516660573. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
8
Minimum clinically important difference for the COPD Assessment Test: a prospective analysis.COPD 评估测试的最小临床重要差异:一项前瞻性分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Mar;2(3):195-203. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70001-3. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
9
Technique training does not improve the ability of most patients to use pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs).技术培训并不能提高大多数患者使用压力定量吸入器(pMDIs)的能力。
Prim Care Respir J. 2011 Mar;20(1):92-6. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2010.00088.
10
The minimally important difference of the Asthma Control Test.哮喘控制测试的最小重要差异。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Oct;124(4):719-23.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.06.053. Epub 2009 Sep 19.