• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多维药物治疗干预对哮喘和 COPD 患者吸入技术的影响。

Effect of a Multidimensional Pharmaceutical Care Intervention on Inhalation Technique in Patients with Asthma and COPD.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Can Respir J. 2020 Nov 18;2020:8572636. doi: 10.1155/2020/8572636. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/8572636
PMID:33294083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7688368/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inhalation therapy is the main treatment for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Owing to the poor inhaler technique in using inhalers, we assessed the effect of a multidimensional pharmaceutical care on inhalation technique in patients with asthma and COPD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 3-month controlled parallel-group study was undertaken in asthma and COPD patients using dry powder inhalers (DPIs). Patients in the intervention group received multidimensional pharmaceutical care, including establishment of a special dispensing window, face-to-face demonstration and education, brochure education, videos education, online consultation and education, and follow-up reeducation. Patients in the control group received usual pharmaceutical care. The inhaler technique score, correctness of inhaler usage, beliefs about medicines questionnaire (BMQ) score, asthma control test (ACT), and COPD assessment test (CAT) were measured pre- and postintervention. Quality of life improvement evaluated according to score changes of ACT in asthma and CAT in COPD and patient satisfaction were measured postintervention.

RESULTS

259 patients finished the study with 133 in the intervention group and 126 in the control group. Compared to preintervention and control group postintervention, the inhaler technique score, correctness of inhaler usage, and ACT score significantly increased in the intervention group postintervention, while the BMQ score and CAT score decreased significantly ( < 0.05). Significant improvements in quality of life and patient satisfaction were found ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study showed the multidimensional pharmaceutical care for asthma and COPD patients were effective in improving inhalation technique. By providing pharmaceutical care, pharmacists might help asthma and COPD patients to acquire better quality of life.

摘要

背景

吸入疗法是哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的主要治疗方法。由于患者使用吸入器的吸入技术较差,我们评估了多维药物治疗对哮喘和 COPD 患者吸入技术的影响。

材料和方法

在使用干粉吸入器(DPIs)的哮喘和 COPD 患者中进行了为期 3 个月的对照平行组研究。干预组患者接受多维药物治疗,包括建立特殊配药窗口、面对面演示和教育、宣传册教育、视频教育、在线咨询和教育以及随访再教育。对照组患者接受常规药物治疗。在干预前后测量吸入器技术评分、吸入器使用正确性、药物信念问卷(BMQ)评分、哮喘控制测试(ACT)和 COPD 评估测试(CAT)。根据 ACT 在哮喘和 CAT 在 COPD 中的评分变化评估生活质量改善情况,并在干预后测量患者满意度。

结果

259 例患者完成了研究,其中干预组 133 例,对照组 126 例。与干预前和对照组相比,干预组在干预后吸入器技术评分、吸入器使用正确性和 ACT 评分显著提高,而 BMQ 评分和 CAT 评分显著降低(<0.05)。生活质量和患者满意度均有显著改善(<0.05)。

结论

本研究表明,对哮喘和 COPD 患者进行多维药物治疗可有效改善吸入技术。通过提供药物治疗,药剂师可能有助于哮喘和 COPD 患者获得更好的生活质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a2/7688368/35d99d9e17a6/CRJ2020-8572636.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a2/7688368/b6b3f5c12f5c/CRJ2020-8572636.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a2/7688368/bc58ae21603f/CRJ2020-8572636.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a2/7688368/35d99d9e17a6/CRJ2020-8572636.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a2/7688368/b6b3f5c12f5c/CRJ2020-8572636.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a2/7688368/bc58ae21603f/CRJ2020-8572636.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a2/7688368/35d99d9e17a6/CRJ2020-8572636.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of a Multidimensional Pharmaceutical Care Intervention on Inhalation Technique in Patients with Asthma and COPD.多维药物治疗干预对哮喘和 COPD 患者吸入技术的影响。
Can Respir J. 2020 Nov 18;2020:8572636. doi: 10.1155/2020/8572636. eCollection 2020.
2
Influence of inhaler technique on asthma and COPD control: a multicenter experience.吸入技术对哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病控制的影响:一项多中心经验
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Oct 6;11:2509-2517. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S114576. eCollection 2016.
3
Usage and usability of one dry powder inhaler compared to other inhalers at therapy start: an open, non-interventional observational study in Poland and Germany.与其他吸入器相比,一种干粉吸入器在治疗开始时的使用情况和可用性:在波兰和德国进行的一项开放性、非干预性观察性研究。
Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2015;83(5):365-77. doi: 10.5603/PiAP.2015.0059.
4
Use and inhalation technique of inhaled medication in patients with asthma and COPD: data from a randomized controlled trial.哮喘和 COPD 患者吸入药物的使用和吸入技术:一项随机对照试验的数据。
Respir Res. 2018 Dec 3;19(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0936-3.
5
Assessment of satisfaction with different dry powder inhalation devices in Greek patients with COPD and asthma: the ANASA study.希腊慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和哮喘患者对不同干粉吸入装置满意度的评估:ANASA研究
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Aug 5;11:1845-55. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S113870. eCollection 2016.
6
Effect of incorrect use of dry powder inhalers on management of patients with asthma and COPD.干粉吸入器使用不当对哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者管理的影响。
Respir Med. 2008 Apr;102(4):593-604. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.11.003. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
7
Improvement in Inhaler Techniques After Training and Counseling in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or Asthma.慢性阻塞性肺疾病或哮喘患者经培训与咨询后吸入技术的改善
Cureus. 2024 Jun 12;16(6):e62255. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62255. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Effectiveness of a pharmacist-led intervention on inhalation technique for asthma and COPD patients: The INSPIRA pilot cluster-randomized controlled trial.药师主导的干预对哮喘和 COPD 患者吸入技术的效果:INSPIRA 试点整群随机对照试验。
Respir Med. 2021 Aug-Sep;185:106507. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106507. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
9
Effect of Disease Severity in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Inhaler-Specific Inhalation Profiles Through the ELLIPTA® Dry Powder Inhaler.哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疾病严重程度对通过ELLIPTA®干粉吸入器的特定吸入器吸入特征的影响。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015 Dec;28(6):486-97. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2015.1224. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
10
[Assessment of inhalation technique in patients with bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].[支气管哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入技术评估]
Ter Arkh. 2023 Apr 26;95(3):210-216. doi: 10.26442/00403660.2023.03.202151.

引用本文的文献

1
Inhalation treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in older patients.老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的吸入治疗
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2025 Mar;58(2):97-102. doi: 10.1007/s00391-025-02411-x. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
2
A specialized training program on inhaler technique delivered by pharmacists to nurses: a study from the United Arab Emirates.药剂师为护士提供的吸入器技术专业培训项目:来自阿拉伯联合酋长国的一项研究。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2022 Jul-Sep;20(3):2726. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2022.3.2726. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
3
Predicting the Risk of Incorrect Inhalation Technique in Patients with Chronic Airway Diseases by a New Predictive Nomogram.

本文引用的文献

1
[Chinese expert consensus on standard application of inhalation device in stable chronic airway disease patients].《稳定期慢性气道疾病患者吸入装置规范应用中国专家共识》
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 12;42(4):241-253. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2019.04.001.
2
Choosing the right inhaler for your asthma or COPD patient.为您的哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者选择合适的吸入器。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019 Mar 14;15:461-472. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S160365. eCollection 2019.
3
Satisfaction, preference and error occurrence of three dry powder inhalers as assessed by a cohort naïve to inhaler operation.
通过新型预测列线图预测慢性气道疾病患者吸入技术不正确的风险
J Asthma Allergy. 2023 Jan 24;16:159-172. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S396694. eCollection 2023.
4
Effectiveness of Hospital Pharmacist Interventions for COPD Patients: A Systematic Literature Review and Logic Model.医院药师干预 COPD 患者的效果:系统文献评价和逻辑模型。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Oct 25;17:2757-2788. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S383914. eCollection 2022.
由一组对吸入器操作不熟悉的人群评估的三种干粉吸入器的满意度、偏好和错误发生率。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Jun 15;13:1949-1963. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S152285. eCollection 2018.
4
Specific, but not general beliefs about medicines are associated with medication adherence in patients with COPD, but not asthma: Cohort study in a population of people with chronic pulmonary disease.特定而非一般的药物信念与 COPD 患者的药物依从性相关,但与哮喘无关:慢性肺部疾病人群的队列研究。
J Psychosom Res. 2018 Apr;107:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
5
Errors in the Use of Inhalers by Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review.医护人员在使用吸入器时的错误:系统评价。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 May-Jun;6(3):987-995. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.12.032. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
6
Psychometric Properties of the COPD-Specific Beliefs About Medicine Questionnaire in an Outpatient Population: A Rasch-Analysis.门诊患者中慢性阻塞性肺疾病特定药物信念问卷的心理测量学特性:一项拉施分析
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2016 Sep 2;3(4):748-757. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.3.4.2016.0134.
7
Impact of community pharmacists' interventions on asthma self-management care.社区药师干预对哮喘自我管理护理的影响。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Jun;14(6):603-611. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
8
Device errors in asthma and COPD: systematic literature review and meta-analysis.哮喘和 COPD 中的器械错误:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Apr 3;27(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0016-z.
9
Effect of novel inhaler technique reminder labels on the retention of inhaler technique skills in asthma: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.新型吸入器技术提醒标签对哮喘患者吸入器技术技能保持的影响:一项单盲随机对照试验。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Feb 9;27(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0011-4.
10
Drug-related problems and pharmacist interventions in a cohort of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者队列中的药物相关问题及药剂师干预措施
Respir Med. 2016 Nov;120:109-115. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 11.